GANNON STAUCH: Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch for child abuse and murder of stepson *GUILTY*

FBI now involved in ongoing search for missing 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy

1580605648538.png 1580605655603.png

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is now involved in the ongoing search for a missing/endangered 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy who went missing Monday afternoon, and the task force investigating his disappearance is organizing a team of volunteers to start searching for him.

Gannon Stauch was believed to be a runaway after he left his home southeast of Colorado Springs between 3:15 and 4 p.m. on Monday. But as the week progressed, his disappearance was upgraded to a missing/endangered person case.

His stepmother said he left his home on foot to play at a friend’s house down the street on Monday afternoon, according to the sheriff’s office. Deputies and major crimes detectives had taken “extraordinary steps” to locate the boy, the sheriff’s office said. They were actively searching for evidence and taking witness statements, a sheriff’s office news release issued earlier this week read.

“He’s very young, it’s dark and cold outside and we want to bring Gannon to safety,” the sheriff’s said in a Facebook post earlier this week.

On Thursday afternoon, the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and other task force members, as well as Stauch’s parents, hosted a news conference to update the community on his disappearance, discuss the steps being taken in the investigation, and to notify people in the area that they are organizing volunteers to begin a community search effort in coming days.

El Paso County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Mitch Mahalko said the sheriff’s office received the investigation on Tuesday afternoon and started doing interviews and collecting video surveillance and talking to neighbors, working to collect new leads.

He said that the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and FBI got involved after the case was upgraded to a missing/endangered child case. The FBI’s team specializes in search and rescue and “will be a good partner” in the investigation, Mahalko said.

He said the investigation was active and that authorities were conducting interviews with witnesses and collecting evidence – exhausting every lead they receive.

Mahalko said investigators were looking at “persons of interest” in the case as people who might be able to give them additional information on Stauch’s whereabouts.

He declined to say where authorities had been searching but confirmed that investigators had been in contact with some trash companies in El Paso County and in the Lorson Ranch area.


Kirby stressed that people with tips should report them to their tip line – 719-520-6666 – and not on social media because any tips sent to the sheriff’s office on social media will not be considered.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I thought the same as you first said here. Until I read the entire thing, then I noted she clearly stated bio more than once and step son. Is she making this up or does she have some son all were unaware of?
well, there's this...

"A family member confirmed that as far as they know, Stauch only has one biological child, a daughter."
 
Yes, I figure she is trying to point out incompetence or mental breaks again but I also think she was trying to show that what she asks or expects her attorneys to do they are not doing (i.e. not accessing her other records to provide them maybe for the competency eval).

As far as a bio son, I have no idea where she is going with that or where it comes from. She is such a loon or at least acts like one that she may mean her daughter but is saying son(??), she perhaps had some child perhaps no one knows of that perhaps she gave up to adoption or lost(?) OR she is just flat out making it up which I can only figure would again to appear to be "insane".
 

Letecia Stauch refuses to attend scheduled law library time she originally requested​


According to court documents, Letecia Stauch has refused to attend her scheduled law library time and has requested to be removed from the law library list at the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center.

The El Paso County Sheriff’s Office filed the notice to the court April 19, which states that she will no longer have access to the law library for 90 days as of April 8.

According to the filing, Stauch filled out a Law Library Request Form on March 5 and signed a copy of the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center’s Law Library Rules after she chose to represent herself in court for the murder of Gannon Stauch.

The rules state that because Stauch has refused to choose the time that she will go to the law library, she will be removed from the law library list for 90 days.

Stauch refused to go to the law library at her scheduled time on March 30. She was reminded of the rules by a CJC officer that day. She refused to attend again on April 2, at which time the officer reminded her once again of the rules.

The officer says Stauch repeatedly said to take her off the law library list and that she didn’t need it.
 

Letecia Stauch refuses to attend scheduled law library time she originally requested​


According to court documents, Letecia Stauch has refused to attend her scheduled law library time and has requested to be removed from the law library list at the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center.

The El Paso County Sheriff’s Office filed the notice to the court April 19, which states that she will no longer have access to the law library for 90 days as of April 8.

According to the filing, Stauch filled out a Law Library Request Form on March 5 and signed a copy of the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center’s Law Library Rules after she chose to represent herself in court for the murder of Gannon Stauch.

The rules state that because Stauch has refused to choose the time that she will go to the law library, she will be removed from the law library list for 90 days.

Stauch refused to go to the law library at her scheduled time on March 30. She was reminded of the rules by a CJC officer that day. She refused to attend again on April 2, at which time the officer reminded her once again of the rules.

The officer says Stauch repeatedly said to take her off the law library list and that she didn’t need it.
I'm so glad this nutcase is behind bars. Unreal.
 
She don't need no stinkin "law library"! She knows the law better than any stinkin law books!
She certainly has went on about her constitutional rights since even before arrest and many times since. Not sure how much law she knows beyond that but maybe she thinks that's enough...

I am waiting for the other shoe to drop. Somehow I doubt she will agree with what the sheriff's department states as to why she is not using her law library time. Somehow I imagine it will be "their" fault not hers.
 
Well, my remarks on her would be the expected ones. Wheelchair now... Won't go to court. Etc. Leticia game of the week... Sickening but obvious as usual.

Not sure why Al called reporters in to cover the personal divorce case in this, as much as I intensely dislike her and want her to rot, it doesn't sit quite right with me. Is he looking for public support and opinion in his divorce?? I think he already has it so why... I have my opinion on that.

As sorry as I am for him and the loss of Gannon, and as interesting as this is, to listen to and read the tweets about, media is not covering it in any depth as they do the murder case I would guess because what she did really has no bearing in the divorce other than maybe a cause for its filing and what it has cost him/them. Sounds like they were headed for divorce and both had reasons prior to Gannon's murder. They were married, have assets, debts, etc. and all that has nothing to do with Gannon and as much as I would like to say otherwise, she has as many rights as he does with the handling and division of those things, it is not the criminal case and they are not tied together.

I guess to put more in a nutshell what I am trying to say is what is Al's purpose in doing that? It is not to help the murder case. If they need anything from the divorce case or can use it in the criminal case, it will be brought in by transcripts and documents or witnesses, and I doubt there is much that would apply; you certainly don't need and use cameras and reporters for it in a personal case. Jmo.

 
That is strange. I'm not sure what the need would be for reporters however given LS craves attention he might have thought she'd actually show up.
I guess so. Even if she did though, I still don't see his thinking. It's not the criminal case and I don't know why he would even want more attention on the fact he was married to her. Oh well.
 

Stepmom in Gannon Stauch case attempts to fire public defenders again​

A court hearing for Letecia Stauch, the stepmother accused of killing 11-year-old Gannon Stauch, ended with Stauch attempting again to fire the public defenders she successfully dismissed in February.

Stauch filed a motion last Wednesday requesting counsel about two months after she asked to be allowed to represent herself at her murder trial.

Fourth Judicial District Judge Gregory Werner ruled last Friday that Stauch would be represented by Colette LeBeau and Kathryn Strobel, the same public defenders she fired in late February.


Referencing a recent letter from Stauch asking for counsel other than the public defenders, Werner sent her to Judge William Bain for a conflict hearing Wednesday. Bain was the presiding judge at Stauch’s Feb. 19 hearing, when she requested that her attorneys be dismissed.

Werner said that if Bain found a conflict warranting the removal of LeBeau and Strobel, Stauch would appear before Werner again next Wednesday for an “appearance of counsel” hearing.

“There is a legal standard that (Bain) must apply,” Werner told Stauch. “It’s not just whether you like (the public defenders) or trust them.”

Details of the conflict hearing have not been released, but court records show that Stauch is scheduled for an appearance of counsel hearing next Wednesday at 3 p.m.
 

Stepmom in Gannon Stauch case attempts to fire public defenders again​

A court hearing for Letecia Stauch, the stepmother accused of killing 11-year-old Gannon Stauch, ended with Stauch attempting again to fire the public defenders she successfully dismissed in February.

Stauch filed a motion last Wednesday requesting counsel about two months after she asked to be allowed to represent herself at her murder trial.

Fourth Judicial District Judge Gregory Werner ruled last Friday that Stauch would be represented by Colette LeBeau and Kathryn Strobel, the same public defenders she fired in late February.


Referencing a recent letter from Stauch asking for counsel other than the public defenders, Werner sent her to Judge William Bain for a conflict hearing Wednesday. Bain was the presiding judge at Stauch’s Feb. 19 hearing, when she requested that her attorneys be dismissed.

Werner said that if Bain found a conflict warranting the removal of LeBeau and Strobel, Stauch would appear before Werner again next Wednesday for an “appearance of counsel” hearing.

“There is a legal standard that (Bain) must apply,” Werner told Stauch. “It’s not just whether you like (the public defenders) or trust them.”

Details of the conflict hearing have not been released, but court records show that Stauch is scheduled for an appearance of counsel hearing next Wednesday at 3 p.m.

The public defenders are probably so exasperated that'll they get up for opening arguments and just say: "Look the biotch is guilty, 'nuff said."

:teehee:
 

Stepmom in Gannon Stauch case attempts to fire public defenders again​

A court hearing for Letecia Stauch, the stepmother accused of killing 11-year-old Gannon Stauch, ended with Stauch attempting again to fire the public defenders she successfully dismissed in February.

Stauch filed a motion last Wednesday requesting counsel about two months after she asked to be allowed to represent herself at her murder trial.

Fourth Judicial District Judge Gregory Werner ruled last Friday that Stauch would be represented by Colette LeBeau and Kathryn Strobel, the same public defenders she fired in late February.


Referencing a recent letter from Stauch asking for counsel other than the public defenders, Werner sent her to Judge William Bain for a conflict hearing Wednesday. Bain was the presiding judge at Stauch’s Feb. 19 hearing, when she requested that her attorneys be dismissed.

Werner said that if Bain found a conflict warranting the removal of LeBeau and Strobel, Stauch would appear before Werner again next Wednesday for an “appearance of counsel” hearing.

“There is a legal standard that (Bain) must apply,” Werner told Stauch. “It’s not just whether you like (the public defenders) or trust them.”

Details of the conflict hearing have not been released, but court records show that Stauch is scheduled for an appearance of counsel hearing next Wednesday at 3 p.m.
Why were the same two public defenders that had been dismissed assigned again?! I'm confused.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,103
Messages
262,303
Members
1,034
Latest member
jarad adams
Back
Top Bottom