www.turnto23.com
I suspect that journalist, etc. and station probably got a few emails etc. and perhaps even a call from the Chief himself. I am tickled to hear from you they took it down or took it out, I did not know that but it already has went haywire and I am sure most do not know that.I respond to many journalists where they blur the line of opinion & fact so it needed to be addressed & apparently my email was read and taken seriously.
In a lot of high profile cases the media frenzy wears down and then the rumors start flying. So, unless the Chief publically states the facts, then disregard all the other drama and leave it for another site to run with.
with my local case it became a common comment as to "that's what I said, but that's NOT what I said!". meaning that the media edited their interviews to where the context was totally different than what the actual conversation was, and then the media wondered why nobody would talk to them after a while.
We had that in our baby case. There were two things at different times that were incorrect, they were not huge but still gave the wrong impression. I have noticed for probably about two years, I don't think there is ever a case, something is not wrong in the coverage and some times two publications will totally conflict on a "fact". I can't decide what it is some times, misinterpretation or sloppy reporting, etc. Yet it happens in almost every case and is frustrating.
I am hearing that more in some of these cases too from people complaining if they were on camera and about what they said and how it was taken. You can tell sometimes too. Some edits are so smooth but others you can almost tell where it jumps, changes or something is just a bit different. Maybe the person is in a bit of a different position, the conversation seems to have changed or shifted too abruptly, etc.
Bingo! This is exactly what I experienced in my interviews with the Register Guard.
And exactly what were these articles about you?.
One was when I ran for an election seat and the other about raising a son with Asperger's.And exactly what were these articles about you?.
That is a great example and exactly 'why' they do it. Sensationalism sells. They are also good at throwing a headline out that sounds much better than the story the actual article tells.
And they spoke badly of you?. Tell them I said to shut it.
The first one did. They twisted it around to make it sound like I was judging those who previously served in the position, which I did not.
HEY! SHUT IT!The first one did. They twisted it around to make it sound like I was judging those who previously served in the position, which I did not.
The second interview about my son was just inaccurate, but not necessarily bad.
Oh yes, headlines! Some are totally different and imply very different than what the article actually has.
That's the way it was here. There was no reason why to change what they said. It added nothing really most of the time except it sounded more sensational and a few times there was no reason that we could figure out. They went through more work editing it differently than if they would have just left it alone.The first one did. They twisted it around to make it sound like I was judging those who previously served in the position, which I did not.
The second interview about my son was just inaccurate, but not necessarily bad.
www.turnto23.com
They have been and it is beyond anything I have almost ever seen. Presumably much of it is legal the harassment and yelling f the people stay on the sidewalks, as to threats those may refer to that or something else. I can't believe though there are statutes like disturbing the peace or a public nuisance, etc.Family of missing California City toddler brothers say they are being harassed
While authorities continue their investigation, the family of the toddler brothers speak out for the first time exclusively with ABC News Saturday.Family of missing California City toddler brothers say they are being harassed
Wanda West, the toddler's grandmother, told ABC News that the brothers' adoptive parents Trezell and Jacqueline West were "really good parents."
The Wests reported the incident on Dec. 21, 2020, telling authorities the boys disappeared while playing in the backyard of their home.
Since then, the "extended adoptive family" of the boys have endured a lot of harassment, according to a statement published by Jamal Watkins, Trezell West's oldest brother.
"What has continued is the alarming number of threats of physical violence (including death threats), intentional harassment and misinformation being perpetuated by groups ... and other individuals," Watkins said in the statement.
"This behavior being targeted towards the adoptive Grandparents, Aunts, Uncles, and Cousins of the missing boys is misguided at best because none of us are persons of interest or suspects in terms of the disappearance."
It reminds me of what the Anthony family went through.
That case has crossed my mind with this. I think it is probably very similar with the outrage and people almost "camped" out there yelling, etc. It may be a bit different in that at times it does seem a Youtuber or two get involved with it with more of the intent to get views, attention and help their channel. JMO and not all, but a few. The thing that is hard to understand is they yell about the grandparents not searching and yet they are not either, they are standing there yelling about it. I don't know... I guess I see nothing productive in it.