Former Kentucky sheriff reportedly admits to courthouse shooting of judge, plans insanity defense citing extreme emotional disturbance and psychotic episodes.
www.foxnews.com
Ex-Kentucky sheriff admits to shooting judge but claims he 'had no control' over actions: report
A former Kentucky sheriff accused of gunning down a sitting judge inside his courthouse chambers has admitted to pulling the trigger, according to newly filed court documents, while his defense moves to lean heavily on an
insanity argument as the case heads towards trial.
The admission comes as the former sheriff's attorneys have worked to establish that Stines was suffering from "extreme emotional disturbance" prior to the shooting, suggesting his legal team is preparing a broad insanity defense, the outlet reported.
In a document written a few days after the shooting, a social worker who met with Stines in jail said he had remained in "an active state of psychosis" and didn’t appear to understand the criminal charge against him. Stines had "episodes of combativeness which has required pepper spray," The Associated Press reported.
In a deposition Stines gave investigators in the days leading up to the shooting, he claimed to have been suffering from dizziness, headaches, sweating and memory loss brought on by
California encephalitis, a neurological disease resulting from bug bites, the Herald-Leader reported.
Prosecutors have not commented on the latest filings. Stines' legal team has argued that a portion of his mental evaluation should remain sealed, a position that the judge recently upheld.
Under Kentucky law, proof of mental incapacitation or extreme emotional distress could take the death penalty off the table in Stines’ case, the Herald-Leader reported. However, a defendant’s standards of intent reportedly differ in civil cases, with Mullins’ widow filing a wrongful death lawsuit against Stines and three other Letcher County Sheriff’s Office employees in September.
Stines' attorneys reportedly moved to dismiss the case under the sovereign immunity doctrine, which shields government officials from civil liability claims while acting in their official capacity. They also asked a judge to dismiss the negligence claims against him, citing the accusation must show proof of intent.
"As Sheriff, he was a county employee and, therefore, is entitled to the same sovereign immunity granted to the County itself," his attorneys wrote, according to the Herald-Leader. "Based on this, the official capacity claims against Shawn Stines must be dismissed."
Additionally, Stines’ attorneys reportedly detailed a possible defense they could use to portray their client’s state of mind during the alleged killing, insisting that he "had no control," and was suffering from "pre-existing conditions."