You will have to read this because i cannot get it to copy paste. It looks like it may explain some of the sheriff's paranoia.
Attorneys for Mickey Stines say the state of Kentucky botched grand jury proceedings against their client, who is accused of killing District Judge Kevin Mullins, according to a report.
www.foxnews.com
I rewatched the video of Stines talking to LE. He goes on forever about his fear they or someone would kill him. Then I read the article where his attys felt he was pressured to not say much in depositions about what went on, especially in judge's chambers and how he could not later reach the wife and daughter and was truly in fear for their safety.
I honestly do not know what to believe here. I've probably said this all before, would not doubt it a bit as we get no new news really or facts.
To me clearly, there were bad things going on. Second, pretty clearly I'd say at least in one judge's part of the courthouse and chambers. Yet if there are higher ups and pressure and a ring or others in on keeping things not known, his shooting the judge does not take out the others or ensure the safety of his family, so that really makes no sense entirely either. He is acting as if he is scared, paranoid and fearing LE officers he knew.
Judges are pretty immune from prosecution (is wrong imo) and I think I've said before maybe he felt hung out to dry with all falling on him, but this doesn't explain what the judge was up to either if it was something like that, why didn't he keep him at gunpoint and force him to write or something what he'd done if it was something like that?
Just none of it makes any sense.
All I have really decided here is that there is corruption in this county at minimum and that there are people who want what they can keep unknown kept that way, it is not hard to believe. I mean I'm not even sure Stines was not involved. They were said to be good friends and perhaps so long as all were getting what they wanted, all was fine. I don't like to comment on physical appearance of people, it isn't something I judge by (although someone like Lori Daybell I will, all bets are off) but Stines is pretty darned unfit and hopefully it is still PC to say honestly, fat. I'd say he ate pretty well and maybe add in what could be beer gut. He isn't going to attract much imo if he was one to want other women, not on his own anyhow only through control too. I'm not saying he was part of things, I have no idea.
The judge too I wouldn't call an overly attractive man, bushy eyebrows and big sags around his eyes. I'm not trying to be mean so much as to say how unfair and gross they are that they were controlling women and using their power if both of them were as well. I don't mean someone attractive would not be as bad when unwanted, but they are both pretty gross on top of what they have to recall and live with.
Probably an unnecessary remark.
Wo
I don't like the missing pieces here and I want no corrupt bunch or county not entirely dismantled or even those above it if there are such. This is a very irritating case. Stines wouldn't say on camera the reason for the fear of men he worked with even. They kept saying there was no reason for any. Who knows??
CLEARLY there is more to this. I guess I'm just driving in a circle again, what we all do in this case.
I keep thinking perhaps the judge shared things on Stine. But then judge is pretty immune.
And it does seem to me daughter was involved in some way or wife and daughter.
Sh*t I've decided a little but not a lot.
www.themountaineagle.com
