• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

GANNON STAUCH: Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch for child abuse and murder of stepson *CONVICTION OVERTURNED*

FBI now involved in ongoing search for missing 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy

1580605648538.png 1580605655603.png

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is now involved in the ongoing search for a missing/endangered 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy who went missing Monday afternoon, and the task force investigating his disappearance is organizing a team of volunteers to start searching for him.

Gannon Stauch was believed to be a runaway after he left his home southeast of Colorado Springs between 3:15 and 4 p.m. on Monday. But as the week progressed, his disappearance was upgraded to a missing/endangered person case.

His stepmother said he left his home on foot to play at a friend’s house down the street on Monday afternoon, according to the sheriff’s office. Deputies and major crimes detectives had taken “extraordinary steps” to locate the boy, the sheriff’s office said. They were actively searching for evidence and taking witness statements, a sheriff’s office news release issued earlier this week read.

“He’s very young, it’s dark and cold outside and we want to bring Gannon to safety,” the sheriff’s said in a Facebook post earlier this week.

On Thursday afternoon, the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and other task force members, as well as Stauch’s parents, hosted a news conference to update the community on his disappearance, discuss the steps being taken in the investigation, and to notify people in the area that they are organizing volunteers to begin a community search effort in coming days.

El Paso County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Mitch Mahalko said the sheriff’s office received the investigation on Tuesday afternoon and started doing interviews and collecting video surveillance and talking to neighbors, working to collect new leads.

He said that the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and FBI got involved after the case was upgraded to a missing/endangered child case. The FBI’s team specializes in search and rescue and “will be a good partner” in the investigation, Mahalko said.

He said the investigation was active and that authorities were conducting interviews with witnesses and collecting evidence – exhausting every lead they receive.

Mahalko said investigators were looking at “persons of interest” in the case as people who might be able to give them additional information on Stauch’s whereabouts.

He declined to say where authorities had been searching but confirmed that investigators had been in contact with some trash companies in El Paso County and in the Lorson Ranch area.


Kirby stressed that people with tips should report them to their tip line – 719-520-6666 – and not on social media because any tips sent to the sheriff’s office on social media will not be considered.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
OMG not sure what to say. Wasn't it the aunt that got a rental vehicle for her, etc., etc. Aunt is calling bad evil stepmom "baby" and not happy with Harley, etc. They also talk about T's mom and her brother, etc.
 
She thinks it is crazy they take 20 percent to pay their housing and living, etc. out of anything they get for money. And then she does her odd laugh. I do not understand this aunt! And if she calls her baby one more time I may puke.
 
I don't even know when it started but I saw it and went in and it's live and they're playing the interviews and it is Landen on and wow.

Just ONE example, she was told by T that she and Harley had to cut the carpet out because Gannon pooped on it and they didn't want Al to find out. You can see investigators wondering about this as I'm sure they've been told it was due to the candle thing. MUCH is interesting and Al was no prince. I don't get much time but for those that do, you should watch these. When this trial was on, most media etc. was on Daybell. And I'm not even sure if all this was played, the interviews of Al and Landen, etc.

 
Then they put Al and Landen together in these interviews. I doubt even if anyone watched this trial that most have seen this. I can only hope I get time to come back and watch the full interviews.

It does sound like Al was never home AND Gannon and Layna were being left alone at times for at least a couple of hours and fending for themselves, etc. And Al knew this. Just ONE minor example of many things in these interviews, some bigger.

Al SAYS he does not know if T works or not, this was current at the time of G's disappearance or just after. What?? This man was CHECKED OUT and cheating if you ask me. Doesn't change the murderer T is but he certainly is no parent of the year and left his kids with her.
 
Then they put Al and Landen together in these interviews. I doubt even if anyone watched this trial that most have seen this. I can only hope I get time to come back and watch the full interviews.

It does sound like Al was never home AND Gannon and Layna were being left alone at times for at least a couple of hours and fending for themselves, etc. And Al knew this. Just ONE minor example of many things in these interviews, some bigger.

Al SAYS he does not know if T works or not, this was current at the time of G's disappearance or just after. What?? This man was CHECKED OUT and cheating if you ask me. Doesn't change the murderer T is but he certainly is no parent of the year and left his kids with her.
Thank you for posting this, I will have a look!
That with Al is worse than I thought. That made it easier for her to abuse the kids . But I am pretty sure he beats himself up about what could have been every day.
 
Thank you for posting this, I will have a look!
That with Al is worse than I thought. That made it easier for her to abuse the kids . But I am pretty sure he beats himself up about what could have been every day.
Yeah, they are worth watching. I have not had the time to watch a complete one yet, but have watched a substantial amount of each I have run into when I have. I leave them on when I do encounter them until I have to go, etc. They are long but that's because they are complete interviews.

Al probably does beat himself up but he has never struck me as Landen does. I personally find him a weak man. To me it is clear Landen let go what she had to to present the united front that they did and he should count his lucky starts because it is clear here that both he and T were not allowing her access, etc. I think it more likely Landen beats herself up than Al but feel he is he one that should be before she should be. She I think pretty quickly believed it to be T and before he did imo. It is interesting they are apart at first in interviews and then together. I do feel he was somewhat concerned about protecting himself and also feel they were trying to determine at the start if he had any involvement or knowledge.

There are some interesting things and the Docket guy comes in here and there to make sure the watcher doesn't miss them.

No use in beating Al up but I'm sorry I've never been an Al fan. It is apparent how bad this all was and he just removed himself and let the kids deal with her imo for years when he should have gotten out of it and took them if as bad as he says. He also went right on to the next one and that's the last thing imo he needed to do to Layna. We saw him when was it, after trial or during, with his new wife, etc. and he sounds like he is Mr. Dad NOW with a BUNCH of kids but...

Anyhow, yeah, I rate them worth watching. They aren't shows by someone so much, they are the sharing of all interviews and actual goings on at the time, etc. He's also had a lot of documents obtained, etc. but I haven't had the time to watch it all. He got everything he could from the case files and they are still obtaining I believe.
 
Yeah, they are worth watching. I have not had the time to watch a complete one yet, but have watched a substantial amount of each I have run into when I have. I leave them on when I do encounter them until I have to go, etc. They are long but that's because they are complete interviews.

Al probably does beat himself up but he has never struck me as Landen does. I personally find him a weak man. To me it is clear Landen let go what she had to to present the united front that they did and he should count his lucky starts because it is clear here that both he and T were not allowing her access, etc. I think it more likely Landen beats herself up than Al but feel he is he one that should be before she should be. She I think pretty quickly believed it to be T and before he did imo. It is interesting they are apart at first in interviews and then together. I do feel he was somewhat concerned about protecting himself and also feel they were trying to determine at the start if he had any involvement or knowledge.

There are some interesting things and the Docket guy comes in here and there to make sure the watcher doesn't miss them.

No use in beating Al up but I'm sorry I've never been an Al fan. It is apparent how bad this all was and he just removed himself and let the kids deal with her imo for years when he should have gotten out of it and took them if as bad as he says. He also went right on to the next one and that's the last thing imo he needed to do to Layna. We saw him when was it, after trial or during, with his new wife, etc. and he sounds like he is Mr. Dad NOW with a BUNCH of kids but...

Anyhow, yeah, I rate them worth watching. They aren't shows by someone so much, they are the sharing of all interviews and actual goings on at the time, etc. He's also had a lot of documents obtained, etc. but I haven't had the time to watch it all. He got everything he could from the case files and they are still obtaining I believe.
Yes Landen is an extraordinary woman, no doubt. How she even could be in the same room with Al during and after all this is beyond me. Reminds me alot of Kyron Horman and his mother ,who is showing the same strength. I hope Landen and Laina can find happiness.
 
Yes Landen is an extraordinary woman, no doubt. How she even could be in the same room with Al during and after all this is beyond me. Reminds me alot of Kyron Horman and his mother ,who is showing the same strength. I hope Landen and Laina can find happiness.
I agree. I think she has a strength that one can just sense. I don't think she's perfect and I don't think she'd say she is either but it is clear how strong she is, how much she loved Gannon (all her children) and imo she's been his champion. Al is FORTUNATE she "sheltered" him under her wing/strong lead imo. I kind of doubt it was easy for her to do so at times. Going from Landen to Tecia was a HUGE mistake in his life and many paid the consequences of that. SHE is at fault, don't get me wrong (T) but he checked out imo and making someone dangerous like T mad or giving her the responsibility for his children and then his cheating imho would have added fuel to the fire of someone like T.
 

Appeals court overturns Letecia Stauch murder conviction​

Colorado's Court of Appeals threw out the first-degree murder conviction of Letecia Stauch for the death of her 11-year-old stepson Gannon over a juror who was allowed to serve on the case.


In May 2023, an El Paso County jury found Letecia Stauch guilty in the 2020 killing of Gannon. She was found guilty on all of the following counts:
  • First-degree murder - after deliberation
  • First-degree murder - victim under 12 position of trust
  • Tampering with a deceased human body
  • Tampering with physical evidence
Stauch was given two sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole for the murder convictions. She was also sentenced to 12 years in prison and three years parole for tampering with a deceased human body, and 18 months for tampering with physical evidence.

All of that was thrown out and the appeals court ordered a new trial.

Following her conviction, her defense attorneys appealed and argued that the judge made an error by allowing a man to serve on the jury who was related by marriage to someone who worked in the prosecutors office. According to the ruling issued Thursday morning, the man told the court during jury selection that his son-in-law worked as a deputy district attorney in the 4th Judicial DA's office - the same office that was prosecuting that case.


9NEWS' partner station, KRDO, got the following statement from Gannon's father Al:

"After hearing the news today about the decision by the court of appeals, I am truly torn by the emotions of potentially having to repeat this process. My resolve, however, has never been greater, my desire for justice has never waivered and most importantly my love for Gannon will never fail. I am reminded daily that Gannon is standing next to God in Heaven and together looking down on all of us. As Pastor Paul and my momma recommended so many times throughout this process, let’s go to the Psalms. I declare Psalm 23 over my family, all of the attorneys on this case and everyone who has shown love and support for Gannon. The end result will be the same and although we do not wish to journey this path again, we stand with those who will handle this case and believe whole heartedly in their ability to finish this once and for all."
 
According to the ruling issued Thursday morning, the man told the court during jury selection that his son-in-law worked as a deputy district attorney in the 4th Judicial DA's office - the same office that was prosecuting that case.
Did the defense not move to disqualify this juror at the time? Did NOBODY? - If not, then why are they allowed to use it as grounds for appeal?
His son-in-law worked in the office. Did he have any connection to Gannon's case at all? - If not, why are they allowed to use it as grounds for appeal?

This poor family.
 
As a result, a retrial has been ordered, but the Fourth Judicial District can ask the Colorado Supreme Court to reverse the lower court's decision.


The state appellate court issued their findings in Letecia Stauch's case on Thursday. The juror in question is considered "biased" due to the connection to the district attorney, the court ruled.

The opinion, released Thursday, concluded "a biased juror deliberated," and "accordingly, Stauch’s convictions must be reversed."

It reads that the juror — during jury selection — indicated his son-in-law worked as a deputy district attorney in the same office as El Paso County District Attorney Michael Allen. Allen was the lead prosecutor on Letecia Stauch's case. The juror was questioned further about if he had discussed the case with his son-in-law and if he might be influenced outside of the evidence presented in court. Based on his answers, the court did not dismiss the juror, the opinion reads.

"Our supreme court has consistently recognized the type of error implicated here — a violation of the defendant’s right to an unbiased jury — as so harmful that it warrants automatic reversal," the document continues.


Denver7 contacted the Fourth Judicial District Attorney's Office about an interview on Thursday and they sent the following statement:

"Today we learned of the appellate court’s ruling in the Gannon Stauch murder case. The court’s opinion is a disappointing result for this office, Gannon’s family, and everyone who loves him. Still, we remain undeterred in our search for ultimate justice in this case. We will consult with the Attorney General’s office about seeking review of today’s decision in the Colorado Supreme Court, and if necessary, we will be prepared to present the case to a new jury here in El Paso County."

The 4th Judicial District has 42 days to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the Colorado Supreme Court asking for their review of this case. What happens in that process will determine if and when a retrial is scheduled.

Letecia Stauch's attorney, Eric Samler, said he would be surprised if the higher court does not review the case next. Samler told Denver7 his client will "likely" be retried.
 
Did the defense not move to disqualify this juror at the time? Did NOBODY? - If not, then why are they allowed to use it as grounds for appeal?
His son-in-law worked in the office. Did he have any connection to Gannon's case at all? - If not, why are they allowed to use it as grounds for appeal?

This poor family.

The juror didn't hide the relationship. The defense could have struck him from the jury, but chose not too. So why is she entitled to a new trial?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,247
Messages
294,789
Members
1,088
Latest member
Haley2050
Back
Top Bottom