• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

GANNON STAUCH: Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch for child abuse and murder of stepson *CONVICTION OVERTURNED* (16 Viewers)

FBI now involved in ongoing search for missing 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy

1580605648538.png 1580605655603.png

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is now involved in the ongoing search for a missing/endangered 11-year-old Colorado Springs boy who went missing Monday afternoon, and the task force investigating his disappearance is organizing a team of volunteers to start searching for him.

Gannon Stauch was believed to be a runaway after he left his home southeast of Colorado Springs between 3:15 and 4 p.m. on Monday. But as the week progressed, his disappearance was upgraded to a missing/endangered person case.

His stepmother said he left his home on foot to play at a friend’s house down the street on Monday afternoon, according to the sheriff’s office. Deputies and major crimes detectives had taken “extraordinary steps” to locate the boy, the sheriff’s office said. They were actively searching for evidence and taking witness statements, a sheriff’s office news release issued earlier this week read.

“He’s very young, it’s dark and cold outside and we want to bring Gannon to safety,” the sheriff’s said in a Facebook post earlier this week.

On Thursday afternoon, the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and other task force members, as well as Stauch’s parents, hosted a news conference to update the community on his disappearance, discuss the steps being taken in the investigation, and to notify people in the area that they are organizing volunteers to begin a community search effort in coming days.

El Paso County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Mitch Mahalko said the sheriff’s office received the investigation on Tuesday afternoon and started doing interviews and collecting video surveillance and talking to neighbors, working to collect new leads.

He said that the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and FBI got involved after the case was upgraded to a missing/endangered child case. The FBI’s team specializes in search and rescue and “will be a good partner” in the investigation, Mahalko said.

He said the investigation was active and that authorities were conducting interviews with witnesses and collecting evidence – exhausting every lead they receive.

Mahalko said investigators were looking at “persons of interest” in the case as people who might be able to give them additional information on Stauch’s whereabouts.

He declined to say where authorities had been searching but confirmed that investigators had been in contact with some trash companies in El Paso County and in the Lorson Ranch area.


Kirby stressed that people with tips should report them to their tip line – 719-520-6666 – and not on social media because any tips sent to the sheriff’s office on social media will not be considered.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's been so very helpful that you are pointing out things in this one since I can't (and others likely too) watch it all so that one can know what is what and giving me the time on this video was very helpful.

I don't think it will cause any mistrial. It is what I think as the judge said isn't unusual that someone realized they knew a witness on seeing them or hearing them. An alternate will come in is my guess and all will go on. I of course don't like the defense but if I were the judge I would side with them in this case and just substitute her. I wouldn't take the chance. She didn't do anything intentionally though or I don't think she would have come forward.

Of additional interest was the judge admonishing T for flipping the bird to witnesses and family, etc.! Has there or have their been photos of her, etc. doing this?

Not that I want to see her theatrics but can you tell me where I see the bs about her wetting herself, etc.? I loathe the thought of watching it but want to see how obvious she was about it being a ploy and knowing the camera would catch/hear her/record her. Don't go to any trouble to find it, I don't want you to do that, but if you know offhand, I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction. It took me almost all night last night to catch up just on posts in Vallow HERE much less watch much else.

I really appreciate all that are posting in all these cases going on and the summaries, etc. of each day, or biggest things/highlights.
It could hardly cause a mistrial or there would be mistrials in nearly 100% of cases in rural counties where everybody knows everybody.
 
It's been so very helpful that you are pointing out things in this one since I can't (and others likely too) watch it all so that one can know what is what and giving me the time on this video was very helpful.

I don't think it will cause any mistrial. It is what I think as the judge said isn't unusual that someone realized they knew a witness on seeing them or hearing them. An alternate will come in is my guess and all will go on. I of course don't like the defense but if I were the judge I would side with them in this case and just substitute her. I wouldn't take the chance. She didn't do anything intentionally though or I don't think she would have come forward.

Of additional interest was the judge admonishing T for flipping the bird to witnesses and family, etc.! Has there or have their been photos of her, etc. doing this?

Not that I want to see her theatrics but can you tell me where I see the bs about her wetting herself, etc.? I loathe the thought of watching it but want to see how obvious she was about it being a ploy and knowing the camera would catch/hear her/record her. Don't go to any trouble to find it, I don't want you to do that, but if you know offhand, I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction. It took me almost all night last night to catch up just on posts in Vallow HERE much less watch much else.

I really appreciate all that are posting in all these cases going on and the summaries, etc. of each day, or biggest things/highlights.
I have only seen her once doing it, same video , time 4hrs.48. The pee thing is about 10min.50 in I think.
 
Last edited:
All along I thought that Harley knew what happened. I have even wondered why she wasn’t arrested for being an accessory. Hopefully I’m wrong.
I feel the same. Do you mean she knew before, during or just after or even was part of it?

I think our tendency (people) is to not want to think a child had anything to do with something bad like this or at least to give the benefit of the doubt but it is a bit difficult here to do that. I of course prefer to think she only knew after but she was a teenager and her room was in the basement with Gannon's and I don't believe this was the first time by any means T lost it or was abusive or beyond mean to Gannon. I will never forget the way they both treated him or even ignored him in the hike video, have you ever watched that? Both T and Harley imo, certainly at the end, were shunning both kids but certainly Gannon.

As a teenage in a household where the marriage wasn't good, Al wasn't home and T suspected him of cheating (and I believe he likely was) and T not being fond of Al's kids to being with and a ton of stress going on, no way do I believe Harley was unaware of any abuse or behavior even prior to Gannon's death. Not so sure she herself was even that nice to him...

I have other thoughts but that's enough. I too hope I'm wrong but I think it is pretty certain at a point long before Gannon was found in Florida, she knew.
 
I have only seen her once doing it, same video , time 4hrs.48. The pee thing is about 10min.50 in I think.
I thought she peed during trial when she was in a room. Now in watching it I realize they were playing a recording of another time in court.

So this is the time people refer to when she stuffed tissues down her pants, etc. and people say it was to mess with DNA evidence or evidence. I'm not sure I follow... Since I didn't watch all. I'm guessing this isn't about Gannon but about her claims she was raped...? So she wants it on camera that she peed and wiped and that's why they'd find no DNA or evidence of rape? Do I have it right? Or way off?
 
I thought she peed during trial when she was in a room. Now in watching it I realize they were playing a recording of another time in court.

So this is the time people refer to when she stuffed tissues down her pants, etc. and people say it was to mess with DNA evidence or evidence. I'm not sure I follow... Since I didn't watch all. I'm guessing this isn't about Gannon but about her claims she was raped...? So she wants it on camera that she peed and wiped and that's why they'd find no DNA or evidence of rape? Do I have it right? Or way off?
They were still playing the recording of an interiew she had at the Sheriff's Office on january 29 2020. She came with notes of her bogus rape story. I guess what you say was her intention behind it, also to claim later that she wasn't allowed to use the bathroom etc. Later she fakes a panic attack and finally leaves with the EMTs.
 
Okay, in watching minutes upon minutes of dead space of her alone in a room, it is clear she knows they are watching her and is making a point of letting them know. She is sooo sickening. Now she can't breathe and they tell her to sit down. Gannon just wanted to BREATHE Letecia, and LIVE. Shut your F'ng mouth!
 
I went and looked at the time stamp of when T gave the finger and was hard for me to see/tell. I'm not one who knows much about trying to enlarge/put the focus on one thing in a video.

Here though is someone who did or has one that has focused in on it. And YES she is definitely doing such to the person on the stand. I haven't watched it all yet, it shows this in the first minute.

You know how certain things can cause a mistrial usually on behalf of seeing defendant gets a fair trial? Well I think in the opposite way when a defendant does something like this, it should be an automatic conviction. LOL, half kidding but not.

Honestly this is an intimidation of witnesses imo and also an attempt I suppose to look insane? The thing is though this woman KNOWS or KNEW the camera and people in the public would pick up on and dial in on this, she is aware of cameras and has been at every turn in this matter both from the time she was concocting her story and hiding Gannon through when she was a suspect to times in jail to now.

In an odd way I think her doing this shows her sanity more than otherwise. It also very much negates her head down as in shame during some testimony, all an act if you ask me. This is the real T.

Gannon was in the hands of a total monster. A totally sane incredibly narcissistic self adoring and self gratifying lethal monster who will stop at NOTHING to get what she wants when she wants it at all costs employing whatever means she needs to uses to get what she wants. That's my opinion of T-Bag the Sea Hag.

And I hate buzz words like narcissist but if ever there was one...

 
All along I thought that Harley knew what happened. I have even wondered why she wasn’t arrested for being an accessory. Hopefully I’m wrong.
After watching the testimony thus far Harley was at work on January 27th, 2020 (Massage Envy front desk receptionist). IMO she probably believed whatever Letecia told her and was not aware of the truth at the time. If she testifies it may be very helpful to the prosecution. Since LE never charged her then she another victim and should probably be treated as such.
 
Motive? :thinking:


Her attorney has since argued during the trial that said she developed dissociative identity disorder as a result of being physically, emotionally and sexually abused by her absent mother’s boyfriends. He said that she believed she was “killing the demons” when she hurt Gannon.

Her defence also urged jurors to put aside their impulse to make someone pay for such a brutal killing and keep an open mind because the judicial system requires Stauch to be presumed innocent.
 
After watching the testimony thus far Harley was at work on January 27th, 2020 (Massage Envy front desk receptionist). IMO she probably believed whatever Letecia told her and was not aware of the truth at the time. If she testifies it may be very helpful to the prosecution. Since LE never charged her then she another victim and should probably be treated as such.
My guess is she most definitely is testifying and will be the "star" witness. If I recall she was on the witness list back when and I think it has been said more recently that she is testifying. If for any reason she refused, I believe she'd be subpoenaed just as the brother was.

I think they may have cut her slack, I don't mean a formal deal necessarily but just decided not to charge her if she blurted out or fell apart with the truth/helped them. And she was a minor at the time.

I think she definitely knew after the fact or at least saw enough and knew enough to put plenty together.

Even though she was at work, it wasn't for long and T had her getting cleaning products. She also slept downstairs/her bedroom down there and where was Gannon stashed, how was it all down there, etc.? T would have needed time and even if she had it to clean, explain, shut the door to his room or whatever, she probably didn't get G upstairs at that point and would have had to do so later and so on. She would have had to explain where he was to the girls and also call cops at the point she did as to him running away, etc. Layna is one ting but Harley not picking up or known anything from fairly early on or putting it together I'd have to wonder about and that's IF T didn't TELL her right off the bat...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,262
Messages
295,951
Members
1,093
Latest member
moscorosco
Back
Top Bottom