• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

The Murder of Rob and Michele Reiner in Brentwood, California (4 Viewers)

day 6 of the last week. they had dinner in the formal dining room, the three of them. they know from the table settings and dishes still in the sink the next morning. no staff, no guests.

i only have four minutes left but am going to have to take a breather from it. too much for early in the morning.
 
The death certificates are out. Interesting discussion in this.


I am only 6 minutes in and this is a graphic depiction of how the injuries were likely caused so a warning about this descriptive narrative.

Dates of other incidents were mentioned when LE were called - 2013, 2014, 2017 and she says what about times LE were not called.

Still watching. About half way through.

Don't watch if easily triggered.
 
Last edited:
I am posting this on here as it was a murder supposedly caused by insanity due to drugs.

He pled guilty due to insanity and got 30 years.


Get the f out of here. I've taken 4 at a time. My pain is extreme. That's a lie.
 
yeah, there is no plea due to insanity, and he was never found insane. it was a plea. he did use it as an excuse to the judge to no avail.

his friend is stupid to think edibles made him do it.

everywhere too it says one edible, the video intimated the same but when one didn't work he took more.

the family is suing the edible company, didn't know that one. and i disagree with it but suing him won't get them any money. they should just take the SS check for the children til they are of age and leave it go. it's like buying his excuse. bad example imo for the kids. however, in the way of the legal system and expense they will probably be offered something just to make the case go away. they should fight it though.
Complete BULLS***!!!
 
that's the same case i posted in the crime news thread. it was a show on it though. i didn't take it as due to insanity, he took a plea for 2nd degree. he was claiming an edible made him do it but they never went to trial with him using that defense. i think i need to read your link, i should have before posting this maybe but i already heard about the case on the video. in the video they had his LE interview, he wasn't believable at all imo. he was talking stupid for a long time to the detective but then finally asked for a lawyer. they found no drugs in his system but for a bit of THC. he was allegedly hooked on painkillers but was between prescriptions and so he bought some thc edibles. one didn't do anything for him so he took more.

i think it likely he used it and bought them as an excuse/premeditation. it was an interesting video. i don't know that he would have used it as a defense at trial but supposedly it is what he was claiming. he was having serious marital and financial issues. he was LDS, his wife was not. he asked for an LDS church lawyer, unsure if they got him one. i do think he did claim it in a bid for less years but it wasn't clear to me. the judge gave him 30. he killed his wife while she was on the phone with 911.

there was talk that LE did not quickly respond but the dispatcher never escalated the urgency of the call, she told LE it was a domestic and even after hearing the shot and losing the woman, i don't think she ever told them shots were fired. she resigned like the next day or something like that.

he plays what i would call "coy" with the detective. pretending he didn't know what his rights were, asking if he was like Columbo, just brining up stupid things and staying away from talking about the actual crime or his wife. said shouldn't there be at least three people in the room instead of two even though a camera was recording it all and he knew it. just acting dumb. i'll read your link.
How could anyone believe that complete nonsense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,247
Messages
294,823
Members
1,088
Latest member
Haley2050
Back
Top Bottom