• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

IN CHILD DOE: BM, 5-8, found by mushroom hunters in "very secluded" area of Washington Co., IN - 16 April 2022 *CAIRO JORDAN*

Attachments

  • 1650237372115.png
    1650237372115.png
    270.6 KB · Views: 281
Last edited by a moderator:

Author: Joseph Garcia
Published: 1:05 PM EDT April 23, 2024
Updated: 1:06 PM EDT April 23, 2024

WASHINGTON COUNTY, INDIANA, Ind. — The woman accused of killing her 5-year-old son and stuffing his body inside a suitcase left in rural southern Indiana has filed new motions pushing back against court-ordered psychiatric evaluations.

Dejaune Anderson, the mother of Cairo Jordan, is charged with murder, neglect of a dependent resulting in death and obstruction of justice in the young boy's death.

Since her initial court hearing, Anderson has fought to represent herself in court and wants her court-appointed attorney, Alex Ooley, removed for allegedly being “the grandson of Joe Biden.”

Last week, Washington County Judge Larry Medlock ruled that before she can represent herself, Anderson will need to undergo two psychiatric evaluations to determine whether she is competent to stand trial.

In new motions filed Monday, Anderson argues the evaluations are a “ploy of harassment, negative stereotype, and intimidation to cause delay in dismissal of [her] case.” She also filed a motion to compel compliance from the court, urging it to “uphold the law.”

Anderson believes the court is not acting impartially in her case and wrote a letter to Medlock, claiming to be a “32nd degree Prince Hall Free Mason High Priestess committed to ensuring the independence, impartiality and integrity of Indiana State Courts.”

“Please let me know how I can assist in this effort and what steps can be taken to ensure the independence, competence, integrity and impartiality preservation of Washington County Court and Supreme Courts,” she wrote.

Ooley remains assigned to Anderson’s case, but Medlock says he is not allowed to file any motions, requests or other documents unless directed to do so by Anderson or if he consults with her first.

Anderson is being held at a Washington County jail without bond and will be back in court on Thursday, April 25 for a pre-trial hearing.
Wow.
 

Author: Joseph Garcia
Published: 1:05 PM EDT April 23, 2024
Updated: 1:06 PM EDT April 23, 2024

WASHINGTON COUNTY, INDIANA, Ind. — The woman accused of killing her 5-year-old son and stuffing his body inside a suitcase left in rural southern Indiana has filed new motions pushing back against court-ordered psychiatric evaluations.

Dejaune Anderson, the mother of Cairo Jordan, is charged with murder, neglect of a dependent resulting in death and obstruction of justice in the young boy's death.

Since her initial court hearing, Anderson has fought to represent herself in court and wants her court-appointed attorney, Alex Ooley, removed for allegedly being “the grandson of Joe Biden.”

Last week, Washington County Judge Larry Medlock ruled that before she can represent herself, Anderson will need to undergo two psychiatric evaluations to determine whether she is competent to stand trial.

In new motions filed Monday, Anderson argues the evaluations are a “ploy of harassment, negative stereotype, and intimidation to cause delay in dismissal of [her] case.” She also filed a motion to compel compliance from the court, urging it to “uphold the law.”

Anderson believes the court is not acting impartially in her case and wrote a letter to Medlock, claiming to be a “32nd degree Prince Hall Free Mason High Priestess committed to ensuring the independence, impartiality and integrity of Indiana State Courts.”

“Please let me know how I can assist in this effort and what steps can be taken to ensure the independence, competence, integrity and impartiality preservation of Washington County Court and Supreme Courts,” she wrote.

Ooley remains assigned to Anderson’s case, but Medlock says he is not allowed to file any motions, requests or other documents unless directed to do so by Anderson or if he consults with her first.

Anderson is being held at a Washington County jail without bond and will be back in court on Thursday, April 25 for a pre-trial hearing.

:urnuts:
 

Author: Joseph Garcia
Published: 1:05 PM EDT April 23, 2024
Updated: 1:06 PM EDT April 23, 2024

WASHINGTON COUNTY, INDIANA, Ind. — The woman accused of killing her 5-year-old son and stuffing his body inside a suitcase left in rural southern Indiana has filed new motions pushing back against court-ordered psychiatric evaluations.

Dejaune Anderson, the mother of Cairo Jordan, is charged with murder, neglect of a dependent resulting in death and obstruction of justice in the young boy's death.

Since her initial court hearing, Anderson has fought to represent herself in court and wants her court-appointed attorney, Alex Ooley, removed for allegedly being “the grandson of Joe Biden.”

Last week, Washington County Judge Larry Medlock ruled that before she can represent herself, Anderson will need to undergo two psychiatric evaluations to determine whether she is competent to stand trial.

In new motions filed Monday, Anderson argues the evaluations are a “ploy of harassment, negative stereotype, and intimidation to cause delay in dismissal of [her] case.” She also filed a motion to compel compliance from the court, urging it to “uphold the law.”

Anderson believes the court is not acting impartially in her case and wrote a letter to Medlock, claiming to be a “32nd degree Prince Hall Free Mason High Priestess committed to ensuring the independence, impartiality and integrity of Indiana State Courts.”

“Please let me know how I can assist in this effort and what steps can be taken to ensure the independence, competence, integrity and impartiality preservation of Washington County Court and Supreme Courts,” she wrote.

Ooley remains assigned to Anderson’s case, but Medlock says he is not allowed to file any motions, requests or other documents unless directed to do so by Anderson or if he consults with her first.

Anderson is being held at a Washington County jail without bond and will be back in court on Thursday, April 25 for a pre-trial hearing.
Oh puhleez woman. You know I will even say who can blame anyone if they don't trust the system or the courts of not wanting to go through THEIR psych ordered evals. However at the same time she is puts out crazy statements yet can wite up a storm and feels competent to represent self as the priestess she is, the high one, who should never trust the likes of Joe Biden's gradson. Intentional as all get out it seems to me. I mean why can they do and how can they deny she sounds nuts right?

Now it's hard to say who may be Joe's grandsons and I guess that would depend on what she knows or how stellar of a life Joe lived (I'll leave that alone) unless she's on the inside track or she's right or nuts right?

She is playing all that can be and is wrong in our system imo. While they have to figure out why to do as she tries to hamstring them. And why they CAN do. The woman hid successfully for how many months on end while I can't recall but I'd guess county, state, US Marshalls etc. were all looking for her. And with the resources available to Biden and likely therefore to his grandson to have grandpa find her, uhm, I think she'd have been found far sooner.

Now it all makes her sound like a nut (sorry if that offends anyone) but she isn't. She is playing a GAME. And she wont' have ha psych eval but continues to try to show she needs one or should just be sent off to a hospital, etc.

Maybe i'm wrong. But EVEN if she has some issues, all the things and the knowledge of right and wrong are there.

And if they do let her represent herself when not capable, that has its problems too. An as her PD said he can't do anything if she is not allowed to buy Anderson.

Does anyone see the boxing in here of the system? And the problems with someone who apparently has a pretty darned good idea of how to play it.
 

Author: Joseph Garcia
Published: 3:39 PM EDT June 18, 2024
Updated: 3:39 PM EDT June 18, 2024

SALEM, Indiana — An Indiana judge has delayed an upcoming pre-trial hearing for the woman accused of killing her son and dumping his body inside a suitcase in rural southern Indiana.
Dejaune Anderson, Cairo Jordan’s mother, was expected to be in court on Thursday, but Judge Larry Medlock ordered last week that the hearing be pushed back to July 11 at 9 a.m.

According to court officials, Medlock made the decision because the required psychological exams from two Indiana doctors have not been completed. The results of those exams would be used in Medlock’s ruling to decide whether Anderson can represent herself in court.

Both doctors have previously attempted to complete those exams, according to Anderson in her own handwritten motions. But both times, it appears she refused to cooperate.

Anderson said Dr. Stephanie Calloway didn’t have all her motions to make an accurate assessment and outright declined Dr. George Parker’s evaluation, instead choosing to “remain silent.”

In a new motion filed last Thursday, alongside Medlock’s order, Anderson said Parker tried to complete his examination again on June 12, but she refused to cooperate.

Anderson wrote that Parker “exuded negative energy from his aura,” which made her defensive and feel the need to “protect myself and my thoughts.” Parker was able to observe her “while she was in meditation and prayer with God” within her cell through a video camera, however.
 
OH COME ON. SOMEONE needs to step up and yell and FIX this stupid sh*t. She wants to play the mental issues game but then won't cooperate. And negative energy and auras, I'd just say those are HERS. Child murderer playing a game. Imo. Give me a break. So let them assess her lack of cooperation and what they DO KNOW and tell her she didnt' allow it so that's that! She chose not to participate.
 
I saw the footage of her in court. Claiming no SS#. But some dam ID#. She certainly acts mentally ill. No one would allow her to represent herself. But IRDC. There isn't her knowing if it was right or wrong coming into question. Therefore, Tough s***. You did it. You hid the crime. It's simple to me.
 
OH COME ON. SOMEONE needs to step up and yell and FIX this stupid sh*t. She wants to play the mental issues game but then won't cooperate. And negative energy and auras, I'd just say those are HERS. Child murderer playing a game. Imo. Give me a break. So let them assess her lack of cooperation and what they DO KNOW and tell her she didnt' allow it so that's that! She chose not to participate.
They are allowed to act like spoiled children, With no consequences for bad behavior. They have been allowed to so far.
 

Author: Joseph Garcia
Published: 3:39 PM EDT June 18, 2024
Updated: 3:39 PM EDT June 18, 2024

SALEM, Indiana — An Indiana judge has delayed an upcoming pre-trial hearing for the woman accused of killing her son and dumping his body inside a suitcase in rural southern Indiana.
Dejaune Anderson, Cairo Jordan’s mother, was expected to be in court on Thursday, but Judge Larry Medlock ordered last week that the hearing be pushed back to July 11 at 9 a.m.

According to court officials, Medlock made the decision because the required psychological exams from two Indiana doctors have not been completed. The results of those exams would be used in Medlock’s ruling to decide whether Anderson can represent herself in court.

Both doctors have previously attempted to complete those exams, according to Anderson in her own handwritten motions. But both times, it appears she refused to cooperate.

Anderson said Dr. Stephanie Calloway didn’t have all her motions to make an accurate assessment and outright declined Dr. George Parker’s evaluation, instead choosing to “remain silent.”

In a new motion filed last Thursday, alongside Medlock’s order, Anderson said Parker tried to complete his examination again on June 12, but she refused to cooperate.

Anderson wrote that Parker “exuded negative energy from his aura,” which made her defensive and feel the need to “protect myself and my thoughts.” Parker was able to observe her “while she was in meditation and prayer with God” within her cell through a video camera, however.
Good luck with that "Exuding negative energy from their Aura" Defense. That's a new one.
 
OH COME ON. SOMEONE needs to step up and yell and FIX this stupid sh*t. She wants to play the mental issues game but then won't cooperate. And negative energy and auras, I'd just say those are HERS. Child murderer playing a game. Imo. Give me a break. So let them assess her lack of cooperation and what they DO KNOW and tell her she didnt' allow it so that's that! She chose not to participate.
Oh. I would. I'd Love to. It's unbelievable!. They get coddled, More, And more. NO MORE!!!
 
I saw the footage of her in court. Claiming no SS#. But some dam ID#. She certainly acts mentally ill. No one would allow her to represent herself. But IRDC. There isn't her knowing if it was right or wrong coming into question. Therefore, Tough s***. You did it. You hid the crime. It's simple to me.
I didn't see the footage I don't think. There is the weight of the safety of the public too versus a single person. And yes knowing right from wrong and if you hide something, you certainly know it to be wrong. Not sure why the idiots in charge all over and I'm not talking one side or anything, just people in positions in counties or anywhere, just are like what the heck do we do with this defendant pulling an aura sh*t now or claiming because they are a biscuit for breakfast that day or saw a dead dandelion as a child, it is some damned excuse for MURDER? Of course I am making that up and being sarcastic but it will come next.

The Aura defense. Her gf was arrested almost immediately but she managed to evade LE for some time.

Yeah she doesn't know what she is doing. B effing S**t. Excuse my French. I'm starting to use such after enough of these cases.
 
Oh. I would. I'd Love to. It's unbelievable!. They get coddled, More, And more. NO MORE!!!
What bothers me even more than what they do and the coddling they get I think is the lack of reaction by the public to such going on. After I die I'd like to look at if allowed and if there is a heaven and if I get to go there at what this ambivalence has taken this world to in say 100 years, even 50. Heck we've seen plenty of it just in the last how many....

When it has gone so far that people can no longer live in their bubble because evil has taken over and they can't step out their front door... Or beyond their fenced yard or gated community which by the way Stephan Stearns was in one of.... Madeline Soto case...
 
I didn't see the footage I don't think. There is the weight of the safety of the public too versus a single person. And yes knowing right from wrong and if you hide something, you certainly know it to be wrong. Not sure why the idiots in charge all over and I'm not talking one side or anything, just people in positions in counties or anywhere, just are like what the heck do we do with this defendant pulling an aura sh*t now or claiming because they are a biscuit for breakfast that day or saw a dead dandelion as a child, it is some damned excuse for MURDER? Of course I am making that up and being sarcastic but it will come next.

The Aura defense. Her gf was arrested almost immediately but she managed to evade LE for some time.

Yeah she doesn't know what she is doing. B effing S**t. Excuse my French. I'm starting to use such after enough of these cases.
Don't worry. I've been taking care of the language. Censored. But, I get the point across.
 
Did the prosecution fight this AND bring in an expert as well and/or CAN THEY?

I almost wonder if they don't want to deal with her pro se. Judges hate such generally.

Unlikely I suppose but the way it mentions revokes her "PRO SE Status" sure made it cross my mind that they want her too incompetent to represent herself and it does seem to be what it means.
 
Did the prosecution fight this AND bring in an expert as well and/or CAN THEY?

I almost wonder if they don't want to deal with her pro se. Judges hate such generally.

Unlikely I suppose but the way it mentions revokes her "PRO SE Status" sure made it cross my mind that they want her too incompetent to represent herself and it does seem to be what it means.
What it usually means is the judge revoked her pro se status because she is too mentally unfit to assist in her defense. She needs legal defense as she has been ruled incompetent by at least 2 psychiatrists and needs to be confined to a facility. It wouldn't hurt to catch up on her behavior, she is quite obviously not sane.
 
What it usually means is the judge revoked her pro se status because she is too mentally unfit to assist in her defense. She needs legal defense as she has been ruled incompetent by at least 2 psychiatrists and needs to be confined to a facility. It wouldn't hurt to catch up on her behavior, she is quite obviously not sane.
Thank you. I don't think I've missed much here. And there is behavior by other defendants in cases I don't necessarily buy.

And that doesn't mean I think I am any doc or know, I just go by what we see, know, timing is a big one and how they acted when free and so forth.

And then when incarcerated yeah, they are then incompetent.

I also go by the knowing right from wrong standard. I don't know IN's things and particulars either of course.

Anyhow, so yes, I follow that it means or is said for one thing she is incompetent to put on her own defense pro se. And I think I mentioned such. However, overall, I would also think it means she is incompetent period to enter a hospital. It isn't as if they just said you need an attorney because you are incompetent.

I think you know I'm much like Mel although she may be stronger even about it than I.

She knew to evade arrest and knew her actions were wrong, for a very long time. And there's a dead child here. She never came forward, she never snagged an attorney and had him call LE and turn herhself in, she never came forward when her gf was arrested and put away.

I don't know that I've missed much at all, but you do see that I'm assuming?

So what are they going to do, restore her to competency and then have to let her represent herself? I don't even get that it applies to the pro SE thing other than of course it revokes that or anytihing while "restored". There is also unable to aid in their own defense which I THINK was Lori Daybell's thing, ONE of her times such was said, if not even both.

You and I differ on this is not an "excuse" and I am not the only one who feels that way.

Again he actions show she knew right from wrong which is the standard most places I've always understood.

And like always, it becomes about the defendant far more than a dead victim.

Both of them know what happened, they intentionally dumped him, they intentionally covered it up and far more. Did she come forward? No. did she know they were looking for her? I'm sure she did.

We aren't going to agree on the basics of all that and that's fine.

I appreciate the response because I do not know your state specifically and the laws.

And I recall a dead boy in a suitcase found and a town caring and burying him and total strangers here caring and elsewhere and a MOTHER that never came forward or her gf.
They had to find out his identify to even move forward.

You know most defendants of the worst crimes are probably not like most of the rest of us. It still is not an excuse.
Meaning most end up in prison and probably had a bad childhood, may have some problems, etc. I think a good portion come from drugs. No, I don't have much sympathy there.

And to most, committing a murder or killing someone is such a bar one would never cross but some do. It's the worst of the worst.

I am not easy on it and I am not into this new way of looking at defendants, letting them out and imo even what the last generation or two were taught (or more) and so no, I don't trust this and simply see as average people what I see and we know.

I also believe in the DP but that's gotten all soft and you may or may not agree on that.

However, I do appreciate the answer.

He gf was sent away. Was she totally fine and with this one who wasn't...

And so, here goes justice for the moment for this boy. She wasn't so incompetent she cam running forward and said that's my boy, I have issues and this is his name.

She KNEW BETTER than to do that to save her hide.

And THAT, for me, is what I look at.

And we do not have to agree.

And again, I do appreciate the response.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,240
Messages
294,100
Members
1,088
Latest member
julie732
Back
Top Bottom