I think the parents should be charged too and I don't take that lightly, would not say it in all cases. I mean the teen made his own choice too.So this couple were asleep in their room with the two youngest kids by 7.30 pm. Grandparents were in the casino. The other 3 were doing precisely whatever they wanted. Recipe for disaster. I hope the parents get charged TBH.
But under fed investigation of the US. The question seems to be if he will be charged federally or if the feds will tell Florida to take it over. And yes, they can charge him as an adult from what I understand just as some states have had even as low as 13 and 14 charged as adults (and maybe less in age).Is a 16 year old legally responsible? I think that will come into it. And this is at sea where laws are different.
I don't think that matters. She was murdered at sea outside of CONUS. I don't think it matters if they were both US citizens. It is where she was murdered that counts so they will need a TOD when it happened and he shoved her under the bunk. They were somewhere at sea between Mexico and US I believe.But under fed investigation of the US. The question seems to be if he will be charged federally or if the feds will tell Florida to take it over. And yes, they can charge him as an adult from what I understand just as some states have had even as low as 13 and 14 charged as adults (and maybe less in age).
This was between family members and they were all US citizens I am guessing plays into that too and likely helps big time. It's not like some guy from Italy murdered Anna or that they don't know what happened. It was all amongst US citizens. I haven't heard this said but it is a guess of mine that it makes it even stronger and gives them the right to both investigate and charge.
Yeah. Not sure. All the news on this like Law and Crime, News Nation, Entin, etc. and retired whatever as guests are saying the FBI takes control because it was at sea, in international waters. I don't know that they are right as there are many crimes where it seems they don't. I honestly don't know but I know they were all US citizens and both vic and perp were. So that was my thought. Also, I think it can depend on what flag the ship flies, where they go out of, etc. and in this case the US is one of them. This ship I think left Miami and was returning to Miami? I know it was Florida for sure, and I think Miami.I don't think that matters. She was murdered at sea outside of CONUS. I don't think it matters if they were both US citizens. It is where she was murdered that counts so they will need a TOD when it happened and he shoved her under the bunk. They were somewhere at sea between Mexico and US I believe.
I linked earlier that in all cruise incidents FBI is called, at they are correct.Yeah. Not sure. All the news on this like Law and Crime, News Nation, Entin, etc. and retired whatever as guests are saying the FBI takes control because it was at sea, in international waters. I don't know that they are right as there are many crimes where it seems they don't. I honestly don't know but I know they were all US citizens and both vic and perp were. So that was my thought. Also, I think it can depend on what flag the ship flies, where they go out of, etc. and in this case the US is one of them. This ship I think left Miami and was returning to Miami? I know it was Florida for sure, and I think Miami.
Also where the cruise line is registered, etc.
I've heard varying thing but the consensus is that the FBI takes something like this but it is up to them whether they charge it federally or if they hand it to Florida.
I'm not claiming to know, it is just my thoughts in addition to what I've heard.
Okay. I know they usually are involved but wasn't sure they always have jurisdiction.I linked earlier that in all cruise incidents FBI is called, at they are correct.
www.nbcmiami.com


He IS her stepbrother, by marriage. Did not share a parent no, that is what a step is.So IMO he wasn't really her stepbrother. They did not share a mother or father. So even more of a reason that they should not have shared a room. Ie an unrelated 16 and 18 year old of different sexes should never be sharing a bedroom.
If anyone can prove that the parents had been warned about this 16-year-old teenager and the way he was treating Anna, then I agree that they should be charged for something.I think the parents should be charged too and I don't take that lightly, would not say it in all cases. I mean the teen made his own choice too.
I'd have to go back and watch but I know she said she was asleep, not sure if she talked of her hub/Anna's dad at all. It was probably just questions to her and about her choices.
We know in hindsight as do they that Anna went back out, the 14 year old was out taking pics at some point and so on. Most definitely they weren't being supervised. Essentially all the teens could do whatever the he77 they wanted, with no parents to say no.
Ok so a stepbrother is unrelated but others may be halfbrother? If they share a parent? I am getting the terms mixed up.He IS her stepbrother, by marriage. Did not share a parent no, that is what a step is.
Totally unrelated, boy and girl, teens. Never should have been sharing a room, totally agree.
A step is no shared parent, a half is one shared parent, a full or bio is both shared parents.Ok so a stepbrother is unrelated but others may be halfbrother? If they share a parent? I am getting the terms mixed up.
Ok thanks for that explanation. So the kids on the cruise were Anna (18) and her 9 year old brother, the 16 yo stepbrother (suspect) and the 2 younger halfbrother and halfsister sleeping with the parents. Is that correct?A step is no shared parent, a half is one shared parent, a full or bio is both shared parents.
To keep it straight, just recall the half means half of the number of parents one has. I have no idea where the term "step" comes from lol. I have four half siiblings (two have passed), we all share the same father. We were all raised together though, it was not due to divorce. My dad's first wife died and then he married my mom and they had us two (I have one full sister).
No, both 9 year olds are girls. One of Anna's relation and one of the suspect's relation, siblings to each. The 14 year old brother was Anna's brother out on the ship taking pictures, who also shared the room. The two 9 year old girls shared a room with the "parents", one of each (meaning each parent was a blood relative to each). I'm trying to keep it concise with wording so as not to confuse.Ok thanks for that explanation. So the kids on the cruise were Anna (18) and her 9 year old brother, the 16 yo stepbrother (suspect) and the 2 younger halfbrother and halfsister sleeping with the parents. Is that correct?
Thanks. I will absorb and process.......No, both 9 year olds are girls. One of Anna's relation and one of the suspect's relation, siblings to each. The 14 year old brother was Anna's brother out on the ship taking pictures, who also shared the room. The two 9 year old girls shared a room with the "parents", one of each (meaning each parent was a blood relative to each). I'm trying to keep it concise with wording so as not to confuse.
Anna 18, the perp 16, and Anna's "real" brother 14 shared the room. Her and the 16 year old were steps, no parent shared. Two 9 year olds shared a stateroom or suite with the parents, one was Anna's "real" sister and one was her stepsister ("real" sister to the stepbrother) and "real" sister of Anna.
it gets confusing when getting into exes and there is an 18 year old too of the perp's that is a "real" brother.
To keep it simpler:
Anna's dad was on the cruise with his new wife. Dad had his kids with who were Anna 18, and son 14 (sharing the cabin with perp and Anna) and a daughter 9, sharing cabin with he and his new(er) wife. The wife had her son 16 (the perp, in Anna's room with 14 year old, Anna's real brother) and a 9 year old daughter of hers with (sharing a room or suite with the "parents" or stepparents of all/each).
So 18 year old Anna, 14 year old "real" brother sharing the room she was in and 9 year old girl with "parents" are her "real siblings".
16 year old perp and another 9 year old girl were the kids of the stepmom (to Anna). So one set of siblings of the "dad" were his, and one set of the mom were hers. Each set of kids are steps to the other set of kids. Each "parent" is a bio of their own set and a stepparent to the other set.
I tried to simplify it but probably made it harder lol.
Anna 18, her brother 14, and her sister 9, and their dad were on the cruise and are "real" siblings.
Perp 16, his sister 9, and their mom were on the cruise and are "real" siblings. Dad of first set and mom of second set I named just now are married. Makes the kids of both sets stepsiblings.
These last few sentences are the clearest/simplest explanation lol.
Yeah, I probably made it more confusing. Just forget the exes and the grandparents. Each parent (married to each other) had kids on board. Mom had two and dad had three. Each parent's kids were not related at all to the other parent's kids. That's as simple as one can put it I think.Thanks. I will absorb and process.......
The more i think about, the more it just blows my mind.
In murders they can charge a minor as an adult. In the US anyway.Well isn't it going to be their fault for putting her in with a 16 year old male non blood relative? He is a child at 16 right?
So that is why they are backing him. It's their a*ses on the line - They were the adults and they screwed up.
Haven't had a chance to watch yet. Will get to it later.