His attorney is VERY good at what he does. It should prove interesting.
And I wouldn't be surprised if the attorney is being paid from the estate. If Nick hasn't been convicted, I don't think he can be prevented from his share of the estate.
I'd also just say that 100 and more different well respected attorneys said Ann Taylor was quite the attorney when she got appointed to Kohberger too. And she is death qualified. Yet I never saw one impressive thing from her. Oh she tried some things, the same kinds of things any defense atty. would try. She had a defendant that had sewn himself in and beyond. In the end she got him off the DP and that's all.
Jackson is a celebrity attorney, not even sure he is death qualified. I kind of doubt it but who knows. I could be wrong. Many think the P won't go for the death penalty as no point in CA plus Rob himself wasn't for it but it's all speculation too and that's only if the P goes by what the family might want if they feel that way. It was also said and I agree that the P can't and won't come off of double life without parole at minimum. This crime was heinous, double, brutal, his parents, etc. And soooo there's no deal. Very likely. And only IF you go for the DP then it can be pled to life without parole, otherwise there is NO negotiating room basically. So that's a pretty good I think sum up of that part of things that I agree with. IF the DA came off from two LWOP sentences, then someone is paying someone corrupt imo. It just is WRONG or would be to do so in this case. And this isn't the OJ trial. The internet had no part in that, things are a lot different in that so many more eyes are on them, even though many were on that one too as it was all over TV but it's different. You couldn't comment, do your own show, etc. To not sidetrack further, a prosecutor that would come off of at minimum LWOP would have to be corrupt imo. It won't happen.
So then there's the case with even the little we know so far. Nick has sewn himself in every which way but loose and he shall never be loose.
AND it will go all the way to trial since there will be no deals based on the above is thought by some great minds that I agree with.
All he has is to try to play some kind o f mental defense but he can't even due by reason of insanity there is too much proof he knew what he was doing. And that it was wrong. With even the little we know. He can't fight premeditation I've heard that one covered pretty well too and some of the more recent things are confirming that.
I'd really like to see if Jackson can do a serious case where he can't use the same bunch of b.s. And then even if he tries, he possibly may very well have represented Nick (one thought with some) for the Reiner and the Reiner family. And the parents had a lot who loved them... Who were big names and their friends were too... And it is all family. It's nothing like Read.
Nick isn't Karen Read and going and playing a YT thing while bitching about publicity at the same time and going on media and shows just can't be done in the same way.
I think it would be pretty hard to attack the department either. From the start, this seems to have been have been handled very professionally and seriously as again opposed to the Read case.
There's so much speculation out there but I would agree with the ones who have said things like I've said above here and my comparison to Read is my own take on it.
Short of the entire family being on Nick's side and saying the parents wouldn't want this either despite what he did AND a prosecutor listening to them (not all do to the victims), he won't get a plea taking it downwards and even then he likely wouldn't as the crime is too horrible and intentional, etc. with a ton of proof just from the little the public even knows to be fact.
I'm not going on at you as I'd hope you know after all these years, I just started to remark and went into the whole thing and some of what I've seen and believe.