• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

PAUL & MAGGIE MURDAUGH: South Carolina vs. Alex Murdaugh for Double Homicide of wife & son *GUILTY* (4 Viewers)

1623728103817.png
This case is being kept pretty quiet, no major details released to speak of (other than it does say there were two different guns used), but no info regarding who found them, who called 911, very little else.

Of interest, the grandfather died just a few days after these murders and it sounds as if he was ill from various articles so probably not unexpected. I think of the typical motives, did grandpa have a big estate? How big in the overall family of grandpa's on down? They sound like a pretty well known family and a powerful one in their state, more on that in the article.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well this is the report of it at the time.


Article date 14th December 2021

Police handout

Image caption,
Alex Murdaugh (right) allegedly paid Curtis Edward Smith (left) to shoot him in the head
Prominent South Carolina lawyer Alex Murdaugh has agreed to pay a $4.3 million (£3.25m) settlement with the family of a former housekeeper that claimed he stole settlement funds following her death in 2018.
The settlement is the latest twist for Mr Murdaugh, who also faces charges that he organised a failed attempt on his own life so that his son could collect $10m in life insurance.
Mr Murdaugh and the alleged would-be assassin, Curtis Edward Smith, have been accused of conspiracy and insurance fraud among a slew of other charges.
The September shooting came just three months after Mr Murdaugh's wife and other son were found shot dead, the latest crime twist in a series of tragedies and scandals that have plagued the family.
Here's what we know about the case.


Who are the Murdaughs?​

Alex Murdaugh, 53, is the scion of a well-connected legal family in South Carolina. Over the course of three generations, his great-grandfather, grandfather and father all served as the top prosecutor for a five-county region in the state.
In June, Mr Murdaugh's wife Margaret, 52, and son Paul, 22, were found murdered near their home.
At the time of his death, Paul was also facing criminal charges stemming from a 2019 incident in which authorities say he drunkenly caused a boating accident that left a woman dead.
Mr Murdaugh was shot in early September, which came a day after he resigned from his law firm.
The law firm later claimed he misappropriated funds, which his lawyer says he primarily used to fund an opioid addiction. Mr Murdaugh entered rehab several days after the shooting.
the Murdaugh family
Image source,Facebook/Maggie Murdaugh

Image caption,
Margaret, Paul and Alex Murdaugh

Now what's happened?​

On 4 November, the South Carolina Attorney General's Office released indictments against Mr Murdaugh and Mr Smith, 61.
In a statement, the Attorney General's office said that both men have been indicted for conspiracy and felony insurance fraud.
The conspiracy charge carries a possible penalty of up to five years in prison and a fine of not more than $5,000, while the fraud charge carries a longer possible prison sentence of up to 10 years.
Additionally, Mr Murdaugh was indicted for filing a false police report, while Mr Smith was also indicted for "pointing and presenting" a firearm, assisted suicide, aggravated assault and battery. Mr Smith has admitted his involvement.
On 4 September, Mr Murdaugh was found with "superficial" wounds to his head after being shot on a roadside.
Originally, Mr Murdaugh's attorneys had claimed that he was changing a tyre when an unidentified assailant shot him. He was released from hospital two days later.
In mid-September, police alleged - and Mr Murdaugh's lawyers admitted - that he arranged for a man to shoot him so that his surviving son would be able to collect the insurance money.
Mr Murdaugh's attorney said in September that he devised the plan in the mistaken belief that his son would not be able to collect insurance money if he took his own life.
"He called this guy [Mr Smith] who met him on the side of the road and agreed to shoot him in the head," attorney Dick Harpootlian told NBC. "It was an attempt, on his part, to do something to protect his child."
Mr Harpootlian added that Mr Murdaugh is cooperating with authorities and didn't want a "fake crime" to distract them as they investigate the killing of his wife and son.


What other charges was Murdaugh facing?​

Mr Murdaugh was also facing separate charges that he stole settlement funds from the estate of a housekeeper who died in 2018.
Gloria Satterfield was a 57-year-old housekeeper and nanny for the Murdaugh family. The family said she tripped over a dog and fell down steps at their South Carolina home in February 2018. She died several weeks later in hospital, without regaining consciousness during that time.
Ms Satterfield's family said earlier this year that had yet to receive any part of a multi-million-dollar settlement.
Mr Murdaugh was charged with two counts of obtaining property by false pretences, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (Sled) said in a statement.
On 16 October, Mr Murdaugh was booked into a South Carolina jail in relation to the latest charges.
Court affidavits released by the Sled the same day allege that he "coordinated with [Gloria] Satterfield's family to sue himself in order to seek an insurance settlement with the stated intent to give the proceeds to the Satterfield family to pay for funeral expenses and monetary compensation for Satterfield's children".
The affidavits allege, however, that Mr Murdaugh deposited $3m from the settlement into one of his own accounts.
An attorney representing the Satterfield family disputed the allegations.
"We are committed to following the facts wherever they may lead us and we will not stop until justice is served," said Sled chief Mark Keel.
For approximately six weeks up until the new charges, Mr Murdaugh was reportedly in a Florida drug rehabilitation facility following the shooting incident in September.
On 14 December, Mr Murdaugh's attorney announced he had agreed to settlement with the Satterfield family.
In court, attorney Alex Bland read an apology from Mr Murdaugh, which said he is "sorry for his financial transgressions committed in connection with the wrongful death settlement funds recovered in connection with the death of Gloria Satterfield and the pain it has caused".
The judgement, however, is subject to approval from a court-appointed receiver who currently controls Mr Murdaugh's assets.


Are the shootings connected?​

Police have not charged anyone in the killing of Paul and Margaret Murdaugh in June and have not suggested that Mr Murdaugh is involved.
Speaking to NBC's Morning programme in September, Mr Harpootlian denied that Mr Murdaugh had anything to do with their deaths.
"He is totally distraught," Mr Harpootlian said. "He did not murder them."
The Murdaugh case also prompted police to open an investigation into the 2015 death of Stephen Smith, a 19-year-old found dead in the same county, less than 10 miles away.
His death was first deemed to be a shooting, but was then ruled to be a probable hit-and-run. Police have not said what information was recovered during the Murdaugh investigation that led them to look into the Smith case.
Authorities have also launched a probe into the 2018 death of the families' long-time housekeeper, 57-year-old Gloria Satterfield, after her sons alleged Mr Murdaugh has yet to pay them any damages over the death.
Mr Murdaugh said at the time that the nanny had tripped over his dogs and fallen down the stairs, but the county coroner has said Satterfield's autopsy was inconsistent with "slip and fall injuries".


Who killed Paul and Margaret Murdaugh?​

Police have no comment about possible suspects in the June deaths of Paul and Margaret.
Following the murders, Mr Murdaugh's brothers, Randy and John, said they were unaware if the family had enemies, although they claimed Paul had received threats.
Attorney Mr Harpootlian has said that Mr Murdaugh doesn't know who killed his family.
However, Mr Harpootlian added that he is investigating "an individual, or individuals, we believe have some culpability or have done it".
"We think we'll know this week whether the one suspect we're looking at bears further scrutiny," he said. "We'll make that information available to law enforcement".
Although he declined to give further details, Mr Harpootlian said that the "motive would be personal".
Yes. That was his story he gave as his "explanation". There was no life insurance policy.
 
Final legal briefs have been submitted for the appeal of Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions.


Both parties in the pending post-conviction appeal of Richard "Alex" Murdaugh have now filed their final briefs, and the murder case that has captivated the world since 2021 is now headed for a South Carolina Supreme Court showdown.
With the appealing Murdaugh serving back-to-back life sentences for the June 7, 2021, murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, the S.C. Attorney General's Office filed its final brief with the S.C. Supreme Court on Nov. 5, while Murdaugh's legal team filed its final reply and brief on Nov. 6.
In a 178-page filing, the SCAG's office argues that Murdaugh was convicted in March 2023, following a six-week, internationally followed double-murder trial in Walterboro, because he was "obviously guilty," citing an "overwhelming evidence of guilt," and that post-conviction issues raised during his trial were settled during a January 2024 hearing before former S.C. Chief Justice Jean Toal.
In this filing and in a previous initial brief on Aug. 8, the SCAG's Office cited more than 100 South Carolina trial precedents, roughly 50 federal case precedents, and over 500 exhibits of prosecutorial evidence to support their case.
Among this evidence was a cell phone video that puts Murdaugh at the crime scene minutes before police believe his family was shot and killed, despite Murdaugh denying for months that he was at the crime scene when the killings took place, then later changing his testimony during the trial.
In a 131-page final brief, followed by a 78-page reply brief, Murdaugh's defense, led by attorneys Richard "Dick" Harpootlian and James "Jim" Griffin, presents a voluminous mixed bag of legal arguments as to why Murdaugh deserves a new trial, ranging from alleged jury tampering and shoddy investigative work to prosecutorial failures such as improperly admitted evidence.
Perhaps the most significant linchpin issue in Murdaugh's appeal revolves around the alleged actions of former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill, who is accused of making improper statements to the murder trial jury so she could write a book about the successful case — statements which Murdaugh says influenced at least one juror to vote guilty.
Murdaugh's team argues that Hill's actions and statements compromised the integrity of the trial, despite a January 2024 hearing in which former S.C. Chief Justice Jean Toal ruled that Murdaugh was not entitled to a new trial. Additionally, Hill was later charged with perjury for allegedly making false statements during that hearing.
"Alex Murdaugh’s conviction represents a fundamental breakdown of the American criminal justice system’s most basic protections," Murdaugh's defense argues. "This case was not built on the 'overwhelming evidence of guilt' the State claims, but on a foundation of investigative malpractice, prosecutorial misconduct, and corruption by an elected court official that denied Murdaugh his constitutional right to a fair trial."

Becky Hill yells down to the attorney general Alan Wilson as he thanks her during a press conference after Alex Murdaugh was found guilty on all four counts at the Colleton County Courthouse in Walterboro on Thursday, March 2, 2023. Andrew J. Whitaker/The Post and Courier/Pool

Becky Hill yells down to the attorney general Alan Wilson as he thanks her during a press conference after Alex Murdaugh was found guilty on … Show more
awhitaker@postandcourier.com, Andrew J. Whitaker

While Murdaugh has admitted to stealing millions from law partners and clients, and is serving lengthy state and federal sentences for those crimes as well, he has steadfastly denied murdering his family.
Meanwhile, the Murdaugh murder case has fueled a true-crime cottage industry that includes multiple books and TV specials, a Netflix docuseries, and now a Hulu TV series.
However, Murdaugh's attorneys argue that the high court should set aside all of this and have their client judged by a fair legal system.
"The public rightly sees Murdaugh’s downfall as an exposé of privilege and corruption in South Carolina’s legal system, and the citizens of South Carolina need more from this case than confirmation of their own social-media-fed ideas about the details of a crime they did not witness. They need to see that their legal system actually works. Satisfying public desire to see a hated man punished is not why we have a legal system," Murdaugh's attorneys write, adding:
"If Murdaugh is to be convicted of murder, the citizens of South Carolina need to see him convicted by a process they would agree is fair if they were the defendants. No reasonable man would agree, if he were on trial for his life, that having the clerk of court secretly advocate against him in the jury room so she can sell books about his conviction would be a fair trial. Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one—powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved— is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law."
With the final briefs in, the case is now "ripe for consideration by the Court," said SCAG spokesperson Robert Kittle. The high court must now decide whether to schedule and hear oral arguments, but at this point, it is unclear whether the Supreme Court will take up the case before the end of the year or sometime in 2026.

Will Alex Murdaugh receive a new trial? Does he deserve one?


Continued at link.
 
Drug addicts never tell the truth. Combine that with being a lawyer too and that explains it. People he dealt with must have known surely?
I think his drug use is also a lie. He was definitely not using as much as he claimed he was, if any. I think it was just another lie he came up with to try to justify himself.
 
I think his drug use is also a lie. He was definitely not using as much as he claimed he was, if any. I think it was just another lie he came up with to try to justify himself.
Well what was he paying Smith so much money for? We've seen the cheques he was cashing with him. Over 400 of them for millions of dollars. Posts 372 and 374.
 
Last edited:
Well what was he paying Smith so much money for? We've seen the cheques he was cashing with him. Over 400 of them for millions of dollars. Posts 372 and 374.
Money laundering and/or dealing is my guess. I guarantee you he was not an addict. He might have used, but not as much as he claimed.
 
This is from July. The guy was already serving an eight year sentence and did a deal for six years, to run concurrently with the sentence he is already serving. What a deal for him?

(NB Prior posts 425 and 1194 cover the previous charges and sentencing for the two dealers.)


DORCHESTER COUNTY, S.C. (WCSC) - The man accused of being one of disgraced Lowcountry attorney Alex Murdaugh’s primary drug dealers entered a guilty plea on state charges Monday.
Spencer Roberts pleaded guilty to distributing drugs and money laundering after lawyers on both sides negotiated a settlement. A judge sentenced him to six years in prison.

A deputy escorts Spencer Roberts, left, out of a Dorchester County courtroom after Roberts...
A deputy escorts Spencer Roberts, left, out of a Dorchester County courtroom after Roberts pleaded guilty to distributing drugs and money laundering Monday.(Live 5)
Murdaugh was convicted in the June 7, 2021, double murder of his wife Maggie, and their son, Paul. Murdaugh’s defense said prior to the killings, for which Murdaugh still maintains his innocence, he had become severely addicted to drugs, in particular oxycodone.
Roberts is the man who was accused of supplying Murdaugh with that medication.
Testimony in court Monday revealed that while Roberts was the dealer, he was never paid directly by Murdaugh. A third man, Eddie Smith, served as a go-between, prosecutors said. Murdaugh would pay Smith, who would then write a check or make cash payments to Roberts, evidence revealed.
Prosecutors said that in the year leading up to the murders, Roberts cashed more than $150,000 in checks from Murdaugh.
“In many instances, they would have in the memo line something like, ‘repair of truck’ or some kind of allusion that work was being done,” Prosecutor Creighton Waters said. “And this was just one way that Mr. Roberts was paid. Many of the other checks would be cashed so he could sell these oxys for about $60 a pill.”
Roberts is already serving eight years on charges of money laundering and fraud. He will serve that sentence and the new sentence at the same time.
Roberts’ lawyer, Mark Paper, says while the sentencing in the case is complicated, Roberts will effectively serve one additional year in prison.
He is expected to be released in March 2029.
 
Last edited:
Yes. That was his story he gave as his "explanation". There was no life insurance policy.
The article says this about the life insurance policy. So there must have been one if he was mistaken about a suicide clause in the policy.

"In mid-September, police alleged - and Mr Murdaugh's lawyers admitted - that he arranged for a man to shoot him so that his surviving son would be able to collect the insurance money.
Mr Murdaugh's attorney said in September that he devised the plan in the mistaken belief that his son would not be able to collect insurance money if he took his own life."
 
The article says this about the life insurance policy. So there must have been one if he was mistaken about a suicide clause in the policy.

"In mid-September, police alleged - and Mr Murdaugh's lawyers admitted - that he arranged for a man to shoot him so that his surviving son would be able to collect the insurance money.
Mr Murdaugh's attorney said in September that he devised the plan in the mistaken belief that his son would not be able to collect insurance money if he took his own life."
Key words... Murdaugh said. This article does not show that he had one, just that was his excuse for justifying his "attempted murder". The video I posted is stating that was also a lie and that there was no actual policy and that it never existed or didn't at the time of the incident, at least.
 
Quite honestly, I don't think it had anything to do with providing for his kid--it was an attempt to get the heat off of him with maybe sympathy for one, and second, mainly, showing other people were after the Murdaughs... Other killers...
 
Key words... Murdaugh said. This article does not show that he had one, just that was his excuse for justifying his "attempted murder". The video I posted is stating that was also a lie and that there was no actual policy and that it never existed or didn't at the time of the incident, at least.
"Police alleged and Murdaugh's attorney said" and "Mr. Murdaugh's attorney said" so not just Murdaugh said there was a policy. That's what i am going by. If there was no policy why would Murdaugh and these others think there was?
 
"Police alleged and Murdaugh's attorney said" and "Mr. Murdaugh's attorney said" so not just Murdaugh said there was a policy. That's what i am going by. If there was no policy why would Murdaugh and these others think there was?
Again, the guy in the video states there was no actual policy. AMs surgery also lied about many other things and he also might have actually believed there was one, too. I think the guy in the video was the prosecutor. I can't remember and I can't look right now.
 
Again, the guy in the video states there was no actual policy. AMs surgery also lied about many other things and he also might have actually believed there was one, too. I think the guy in the video was the prosecutor. I can't remember and I can't look right now.
No problem. I guess if there is a retrial, everything will be gone over again anyway.
 
I haven't watched this yet but WHAT??? I guess I'll see what it is about.

i have no respect at all for his lawyer or the cohort who defended him.


It is Harpootlian selling a new book about a serial killer he prosecuted.

This guy- Donald 'Peewee' Gaskins.

"Donald Henry "Pee Wee" Gaskins Jr. (born Donald Henry Parrott Jr.; March 13, 1933 – September 6, 1991) was an American serial killer and rapist from South Carolina who stabbed, shot, drowned, and poisoned more than a dozen people."


 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,255
Messages
295,283
Members
1,090
Latest member
rumancek
Back
Top Bottom