Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *NOT GUILTY* (Guilty of OUI) (49 Viewers)

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 

[Guess Who]

He would have said that on the stand. On the stand, IIRC, all he said is that he didn't hear a thing.

The prosecution would have made sure it was stated in court IF it really happened. There is absolutely no chance that they would have not.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

I'm watching the Dateline from last night. You can watch it on the NBC app. You don't need to buy anything. They give you four free views of stuff.

Watch Dateline Episode: Center of the Storm - NBC.com

Watch Center of the Storm (Season 33, Episode 30) of Dateline or get episode details on NBC.com

www.nbc.com

It's also available on Peacock.

 

[Tresir]

The guy couldn't believe, like many of us, that his injuries were caused by Karen's car.

Well i am the opposite. With his arm bent holding the glass that ended up broken and embedded in his nose, the abrasions from the tail light are pretty clear to me and aligned with the holes and shards in the arm of the sweatshirt plus the bruise on the back of the hand. Sadly they were not able to convince the jury so his killer is free right now, no matter who is thought to be responsible.

 

[Tresir]

I'm watching the Dateline from last night. You can watch it on the NBC app. You don't need to buy anything. They give you four free views of stuff.

Watch Dateline Episode: Center of the Storm - NBC.com

Watch Center of the Storm (Season 33, Episode 30) of Dateline or get episode details on NBC.com

www.nbc.com

It's also available on Peacock.

Thanks for that but i have seen enough by watching and following the evidence in the trial.

 

[Tresir]

BTW heading on the thread needs changing. It should read "GUILTY OF OUI" not "NOT GUILTY".

 

[Guess Who]

BTW heading on the thread needs changing. It should read "GUILTY OF OUI" not "NOT GUILTY".

She was never charged with oui.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

Thanks for that but i have seen enough by watching and following the evidence in the trial.

Not even close to what both juries watched in the evidence.

 

[Guess Who]

Not even close to what both juries watched in the evidence.

2 sets of 12 ALL said she was not guilty.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

2 sets of 12 ALL said she was not guilty.

Not guilty on two of the three charges in the first one.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

Well i am the opposite. With his arm bent holding the glass that ended up broken and embedded in his nose, the abrasions from the tail light are pretty clear to me and aligned with the holes and shards in the arm of the sweatshirt plus the bruise on the back of the hand. Sadly they were not able to convince the jury so his killer is free right now, no matter who is thought to be responsible.

The defense's expert couldn't make the backlight break in the same way.

 

[Guess Who]

Not guilty on two of the three charges in the first one.

The most serious charges, they voted not guilty on the first one.

 

[GrandmaBear]

BTW heading on the thread needs changing. It should read "GUILTY OF OUI" not "NOT GUILTY".

AGREE!

 

[GrandmaBear]

Not guilty on two of the three charges in the first one.

She was never charged with oui.

What are you talking about? Semantics or something? Was it OWI or DUI rather? Same thing basically and she was found guilty.

 

[GrandmaBear]

Not even close to what both juries watched in the evidence.

Your pet case and you said flat out on here you were not watching any of the trial so I'd say if you didn't you then you are the one who missed a lot. No?

 

[GrandmaBear]

2 sets of 12 ALL said she was not guilty.

I don't think that's right. Remember it was hung? If she was cleared, she would not have been retried. People need to quit saying she was found innocent on all, she was not. In either trial.

 

[GrandmaBear]

The defense's expert couldn't make the backlight break in the same way.

Yeah, some of us heard both experts. Hard to say what you watched. No offense. Vinnie?

 

[GrandmaBear]

Attorney, from Brazil.

Yeah, apparently she did not come over here and get licensed, she said she knew a little or some law. There were just a lot of things, some even little with her. Who is lying as to the crowds and fans adding a lot of pressure, the first juror or her? Weren't they on the same jury?

We know we are never going to agree on most and I for one am glad this is over. I'm sick to death of it.

I am always interested in hearing from jurors although I am always wary of the first ones out going to media.

She also said she thinks KR may have swiped John but was then sure he went into the house. What? Is she making up her own sh*t?

 

[GrandmaBear]

I'm almost always inerested to hear from others so that I can at least try to understand why they think like they do but in this instance it's not only pointless but I don't give a damn.

Lol. Part of the same club. Mob influence.

 

[Tresir]

She was never charged with oui.

She was. She was charged with manslaughter while OUI but they just found her guilty of OUI so thread title should be changed to reflect that verdict. Its blatantly wrong for it to say NOT GUILTY. She on probation.

 

[Tresir]

Yeah, some of us heard both experts. Hard to say what you watched. No offense. Vinnie?

She was pissed as a fart and couldn't even remember where she dropped him. She thought she had left him at the Waterfall. I think she's an alcoholic TBH.