Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *NOT GUILTY* (Guilty of OUI) (36 Viewers)

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Tresir said:
A second juror speaks and there is a video in the article.

www.cbsnews.com

Karen Read juror confident in verdict, says "we couldn't prove there was a collision"

A juror in the high-profile Karen Read trial is confident in her decision and hopes the case can be reopened.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

Reaction from McCabe and Albert families.

www.cbsnews.com

Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"

Several key witnesses in the Karen Read trial released a statement on Wednesday, saying the verdict that acquitted her of the most serious charges is a "devastating miscarriage of justice."
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...

The woman juror, AND the guy in the first video, noticed no problems with the taillight before entering Sallyport.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
And to be clear, I don't think Karen is a very likeable person.
Click to expand...
It's good to hear that. It's like with me I've never said the investigation was perfect or that Proctor did not hurt it. It just doesn't change my opinion that she did this. Nothing ever will. And she's extremely sickening and dislikeable to me.

I'm sorry but I've still not cleared the jury either. They seemed with the questions intent on not having anything hung again or at least someone did and that tells me one at least imo knew about the last trial. Or I suspect someone did.
 
Tresir said:
A second juror speaks and there is a video in the article.

www.cbsnews.com

Karen Read juror confident in verdict, says "we couldn't prove there was a collision"

A juror in the high-profile Karen Read trial is confident in her decision and hopes the case can be reopened.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

Reaction from McCabe and Albert families.

www.cbsnews.com

Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"

Several key witnesses in the Karen Read trial released a statement on Wednesday, saying the verdict that acquitted her of the most serious charges is a "devastating miscarriage of justice."
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...

Yeah, the McCabe's and Albert's are likely very upset that the jurors who've talked so far couldn't rule out his being hurt in the house.
 
GrandmaBear said:
It's good to hear that. It's like with me I've never said the investigation was perfect or that Proctor did not hurt it. It just doesn't change my opinion that she did this. Nothing ever will. And she's extremely sickening and dislikeable to me.

I'm sorry but I've still not cleared the jury either. They seemed with the questions intent on not having anything hung again or at least someone did and that tells me one at least imo knew about the last trial. Or I suspect someone did.
Click to expand...

Of course, they knew about the prior outcome. You'd have to live under a rock in that area to not know. It doesn't mean they already knew the evidence presented then.
 
Tresir said:
A second juror speaks and there is a video in the article.

www.cbsnews.com

Karen Read juror confident in verdict, says "we couldn't prove there was a collision"

A juror in the high-profile Karen Read trial is confident in her decision and hopes the case can be reopened.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

Reaction from McCabe and Albert families.e

www.cbsnews.com

Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"

Several key witnesses in the Karen Read trial released a statement on Wednesday, saying the verdict that acquitted her of the most serious charges is a "devastating miscarriage of justice."
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...
Keeping them separate, only commenting so far on the juror. I have a lot of problems with her and things she said. And she is an ATTY? I don't have trouble with doubts about the investigation but I do with almost all else she said. She also made pretty clear what I wondered, that they did NOT want any hung charge and knew about the other trial and so on. Imo. Interesting first juror said crowds and fans were a major stressor and she talks as if no, they weren't. Very different opinions. There is absolutely NO proof he ever went inside that home but she thinks he did but gives absolutely no reason for believing that.

I could go on, comes across as some nice woman but just not flying for me. From Brazil, understands a little about law. Lol.

At least she had the decency to feel bad for the OK family.

I did say it earlier and think most if not all would agree with this, LE needs to be on their game because if not, it's what can happen in an imperfect investigation.

There were other remarks by her I in no way agreed with or thought she had basis for but I'm not going to try to recall.

I wonder how much this jury knew about this case and the media and the previous trial though. Not real impressed by these first two and they did have differing thoughts.

Anyhow onto your second link in awhile here, enough for now for me.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
Of course, they knew about the prior outcome. You'd have to live under a rock in that area to not know. It doesn't mean they already knew the evidence presented then.
Click to expand...
Also, the original jury thought very much the same thing. The prosecution also had just as much say in the picking of the jurors as the defense did in both trials.
 
GrandmaBear said:
Keeping them separate, only commenting so far on the juror. I have a lot of problems with her and things she said. And she is an ATTY? I don't have trouble with doubts about the investigation but I do with almost all else she said. She also made pretty clear what I wondered, that they did NOT want any hung charge and knew about the other trial and so on. Imo. Interesting first juror said crowds and fans were a major stressor and she talks as if no, they weren't. Very different opinions. There is absolutely NO proof he ever went inside that home but she thinks he did but gives absolutely no reason for believing that.

I could go on, comes across as some nice woman but just not flying for me. From Brazil, understands a little about law. Lol.

At least she had the decency to feel bad for the OK family.

I did say it earlier and think most if not all would agree with this, LE needs to be on their game because if not, it's what can happen in an imperfect investigation.

There were other remarks by her I in no way agreed with or thought she had basis for but I'm not going to try to recall.

I wonder how much this jury knew about this case and the media and the previous trial though. Not real impressed by these first two and they did have differing thoughts.

Anyhow onto your second link in awhile here, enough for now for me.
Click to expand...

Attorney, from Brazil.
 
Last edited:
Cousin Dupree said:
The police were already in the Albert's house? They never went in that day!!
Click to expand...

The "expert" who's interviewed says that this is the first he'd heard that. Rather than finding it hinky Mr. Albert said that, he believes him.

I find it very difficult to believe that in all of this, we've never heard it mentioned while in trial. Why didn't he say that on the stand? My view is because nobody entered the house on that day.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
The "expert" who's interviewed says that this is the first he'd heard that. Rather than finding it hinky Mr. Albert said that, he believes him.

I find it very difficult to believe that in all of this, we've never heard it mentioned while in trial. Why didn't he say that on the stand? My view is because nobody entered the house on that day.
Click to expand...
Because it's a crime to lie in court but it is not a crime to lie to the media.
 
Guess Who said:
It sure seems it would have been mentioned and brought up by the prosecution IF it really happened since all the other testimony stated they were not in the house. How would the prosecution not insist that come out on court? Surrrrrrre.
Click to expand...

He would have said that on the stand. On the stand, IIRC, all he said is that he didn't hear a thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 37 (members: 0, guests: 37)

Forum statistics

Threads
3,103
Messages
262,154
Members
1,034
Latest member
jarad adams
Back
Top Bottom