• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *NOT GUILTY* (Guilty of OUI) (7 Viewers)

You know what the P should do? Get that all typed out and headed "in her own words" and give it as a handout to each juror prior to playing the clips. They can keep that in the jury room with them. They should also have the 15 min video available for them to watch again if they wish, during deliberations.
 
You know what the P should do? Get that all typed out and headed "in her own words" and give it as a handout to each juror prior to playing the clips. They can keep that in the jury room with them. They should also have the 15 min video available for them to watch again if they wish, during deliberations.
YES. They should convict her by her own lies and words. I'd give a closing of lining up all of the evidence and then juxtapose the woman who never learns to shut her mouth with one claim and then her changed claim and lies of which there are MANY.

I don't disagree with anyone who thinks it was an imperfect investigation but that's where I stop. I don't make a leap from there from there to some totally ridiculous conspiracy. Just as in Delphi I clear away the b.s. and look at the facts.
 
YES. They should convict her by her own lies and words. I'd give a closing of lining up all of the evidence and then juxtapose the woman who never learns to shut her mouth with one claim and then her changed claim and lies of which there are MANY.

I don't disagree with anyone who thinks it was an imperfect investigation but that's where I stop. I don't make a leap from there from there to some totally ridiculous conspiracy. Just as in Delphi I clear away the b.s. and look at the facts.
Imperative in any investigation is cooperative witnesses and not only had Read left town (hadn't even offered info to John's loved ones about what happened) but when Bukhenik and Proctor went to her parent's home to get her info, she told them she wasn't going into details. (Btw, I think she must have told them she'd obtained an attorney because they'd received very little and vague info from her and that was it.)
Anyway, what most hindered this investigation was their one uncooperative witness- the only one- which was Read, herself!
 
Last edited:
Imperative in any investigation is cooperative witnesses and not only had Read left town (hadn't even offered info to John's loved ones about what happened) but when Bukhenik and Proctor went to her parent's home to get her info, she told them she wasn't going into details. (Btw, I think she must have told them she'd obtained an attorney because they'd received very little and vague info from her and that was it.)
Anyway, what most hindered this investigation was their one uncooperative witness- the only one- which was Read, herself!
I'd say she had at least talked to one probably if not retained anyone. Yeah she did not help matters but it is her right to get an atty or advice and to not say anything whether we like it or not.
 
Even the saner chats are ridiculous at times. Even those one thinks are somewhat sane are not, they can't clear the b.s. and bias at all. A recording device from a vehicle IS a recording device. DUH. It's a piece of tech. FACE IT. Man they make excuses, some, for everything so they can keep their narrative and thoughts.
 
Looks like this will be the last witness for the P.


Sorry but i couldn't paste any of this for some reason, but it looks like very interesting reconstruction data on the accident and the impact injuries on JO's arm.

It looks like this could be the last P witness. I will see if I can find another link to post the detail.
 
Last edited:
This is from a Fox news link. I was able to copy this info. Looks like P will rest after this.



Last Update May 27, 2025, 3:26 PM EDT

Crash expert puts Karen Read’s SUV outside party house during critical window of O’Keefe’s death.​

Covered by: Sarah Rumpf-Whitten and Julia Bonavita

Testimony is entering its sixth week with the prosecution calling Dr. Judson Welcher to the witness stand.

SUV reenactment shows how Read's Lexus could disrupt balance at 2 mph: expert​



SUV reenactment shows how Read's Lexus could disrupt balance at 2 mph: expert

Dr. Judson Welcher reenacted a Lexus SUV strike in court on Tuesday, May 27. (Aperature LLC)


Crash expert Dr. Judson Welcher presented a detailed reenactment of the alleged three-point turn that prosecutors claim led to the death of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe.

Utilizing laser scans of the crime scene and vehicles, Welcher created computer models and video simulations to illustrate the maneuver.

He showcased a computer model depicting Read's Lexus SUV in a forward movement followed by a high-throttle reverse, which resulted in a three-point turn. He said that the data captured during this maneuver aligned with the window of O’Keefe’s cell phone activity, placing the vehicle in front of 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Mass. between 12:30:20 and 12:32:12 a.m.

In an additional demonstration, Welcher used a vehicle identical to Read's SUV, with him standing in as O'Keefe. Welcher showed pictures of himself dressed as O'Keefe, noting that he was 4 pounds lighter than the police officer at the time of the alleged incident.

Welcher demonstrated that even at a low speed of 2 mph, the SUV's impact was sufficient to disrupt his balance, causing him to step back. He showed where the taillight would have hit his arm, but said "we don't know how he was struck."

Welcher pointed out that there was no damage to the upper or lower taillights, despite a scuff mark located between them. He noted that the lower taillight, which protrudes further than the upper one, remained intact.
Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
3 hours ago

Courtroom simulation maps Read's SUV movements on night of O'Keefe's death​






Judge Beverly Cannone has paused proceedings for a 45-minute lunch break following an intensive session of testimony from crash reconstruction expert, Dr. Judson Welcher.

Welcher spent the last 20 minutes meticulously analyzing second-by-second data points to reconstruct a critical three-point turn made by Karen Read’s Lexus SUV near 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Mass. on the night of Jan. 29, 2022.

Utilizing data from the vehicle's Techstream system and cell phone records, Welcher presented a simulation at 12:40 p.m. that illustrated the SUV's movements during the maneuver.
Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
4 hours ago

Expert places Read’s SUV near 34 Fairview prior to O’Keefe’s time of death​


Dr. Judson Welcher, an accident reconstruction expert, testified Tuesday about digital data pulled from Karen Read’s Lexus SUV, aiming to pinpoint the vehicle’s movements on the night of John O’Keefe’s death.

Welcher's testimony put Read in the area of 34 Fairview Road, Canton, Mass. during the critical moments of O'Keefe's looming death.

Welcher explained how data from the infotainment system, GPS, and cell phone records were synchronized to establish a timeline.

“I was provided with data, and a report from Mr. Burgess that indicated the infotainment system was turned on at 12:36,” Welcher said.

The data point became a reference to convert the car’s text stream data, which logs time as a running clock, into timestamps.

“You told us that the text stream data does not have an actual clock and has a running clock like a stopwatch?” asked Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan. “And then you mentioned that after you received information from Mr. Burgess, you could put an actual time onto it. How do you do that?”

With the infotainment system activation fixed at 12:36 a.m., Welcher said he could align a trigger in the data stream to 12:23:38 a.m.

Prosecutors also pointed to GPS data placing Read's Lexus SUV near the Waterfall Bar and Grille and described a three-point turn on Cedar Crest Road, near the scene.

“Additional cell phone data that we had is that we knew there was a three-point turn made when the Lexus passed Fairview on Cedar Crest, pulled into a driveway and made a three-point turn,” Welcher said.
Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
5 hours ago

Expert recreated crash with identical Lexus, tells jury: 'I have no dog in this fight'​



Expert recreated crash with identical Lexus, tells jury: 'I have no dog in this fight'

Dr. Judson Welcher, a crash reconstruction expert, testified on Tuesday, May 27. (Aperature LLC)


Dr. Judson Welcher took the stand Tuesday as the state worked to close its case in the murder retrial of Karen Read.

In front of a seated jury, Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan began direct examination of Dr. Welcher, an accident reconstruction expert.

“I take my job as to be a critical analysis of the data. So I wanted to look at the data as objectively as possible and form conclusions based upon the data, trying to remove wherever possible, speculation,” Welcher testified.

“Now, sometimes testimony is the only thing we have, and so we need to rely on it for bits and pieces. But generally my job is to try and look at data and see what the data shows. I have no dog in this fight. I don't, quite frankly, care. What I'm doing is trying to do a good engineering job, looking at the data and drawing sound principles and sound conclusions from the data.”

Welcher listed an exhaustive inventory of physical evidence he used to form his conclusions about the crash scene.

His review used materials from the Canton Police Department, cruiser dashboard cameras, Ring doorbell videos, scene photographs, Verizon and Lexus Connect data, lab toxicology reports, and multiple interviews given by Read to media outlets.

“I have police reports, including the Canton PD incident report and eight other reports,” Welcher testified. “I have the Ring video from Mr. O’Keefe’s residence, cruiser cameras, 140 photographs of vehicles, additional photographs of the scene, surveillance video files from McCarthy’s Shipping, Waterfall Bar, Cellebrite data, Lexus infotainment system data, Verizon GPS records, weather reports, medical records, and two retrograde extrapolation reports.”

In an effort to replicate and analyze conditions relevant to the case, Welcher also purchased the same make and model of SUV that Read was driving, a 2021 Lexus RX350, and conducted his own field testing.

He said that he had presented an early version of his analysis to the prosecution team via PowerPoint on January 30, and that he had visited 34 Fairview Road, the scene where John O’Keefe’s body was discovered.

Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten

6 hours ago

Defense questions Dr. Judson Welcher on PowerPoint edits, contact with prosecutors before testimony​



Defense questions Dr. Judson Welcher on PowerPoint edits, contact with prosecutors before testimony

Dr. Judson Welcher, Biomechanical Engineer and Accident Reconstructionist, testifies during the Karen Read murder trial at Norfolk Superior Court, Tuesday, May 27, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (Matt Stone/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)


Nationally known accident reconstruction expert, Dr. Judson Welcher, took the stand on Tuesday morning.

Welcher first faced voir dire, a legal vetting process to assess whether he should be accepted as an expert witness.

The voir dire was conducted by Read’s defense attorney, Robert Alessi, who focused on recent modifications made to Welcher’s PowerPoint presentation, which the state intends to use.

Welcher acknowledged that he had altered the presentation within the past 8 to 10 days, removing a slide and changing wording. The edits related to the Dighton route and vehicle mileage, both crucial components in the prosecution’s theory of the timeline.

Alessi pressed Welcher about who he had spoken with about the content and edits. Welcher testified that he had discussed the PowerPoint with Assistant District Attorneys Hank Brennan, Adam Lally, and Mary Ellen Gray, as well as Lt. Brian Tully, an investigator in the case.

Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
7 hours ago

Karen Read returns to court as prosecution nears end in high-stakes retrial​


Karen Read arrived in court on Wednesday morning as her second trial for the alleged murder of Boston police officer John O’Keefe resumed after a five-day recess.

Dressed in a dark green suit, she was flanked by her lead defense attorney, Alan Jackson, who is preparing to launch their defense as the prosecution wraps up its case.

Tuesday marked a pivotal moment in the retrial. After 21 days of testimony, the prosecution is expected to call its final witness, an accident reconstruction expert, before resting its case.
Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
7 hours ago

State poised to wrap case against Karen Read after presenting taillight evidence, forensics​



State poised to wrap case against Karen Read after presenting taillight evidence, forensics

Karen Read, who is accused of killing her boyfriend Boston police Officer John O'Keefe, in 2022, during her murder trial at Norfolk Superior Court, Tuesday, May 27, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (Matt Stone/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)


After nearly two months of witness testimony, expert analysis, and intense cross-examination, the prosecution in the Karen Read retrial is expected to rest its case this week in Norfolk Superior Court.

Read, who is charged with second-degree murder in the 2022 death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe, has maintained her innocence, claiming she did not hit O’Keefe with her car.

Prosecutors allege she struck O’Keefe with her SUV after a night of drinking and left him to die in the snow outside a friend’s home.

Over the past eight weeks, the prosecution has called more than 30 witnesses, including forensic specialists, law enforcement officers, and civilians present on the night in question.

Key evidence has included plastic taillight fragments said to match Read's damaged Lexus RX350, digital forensic analysis of O'Keefe's phone and location and witness testimony who alleged that Read made incriminating statements after the incident.
Posted by Sarah Rumpf-Whitten
Live Coverage begins here
 
Last edited:
Looks like this will be the last witness for the P.


Sorry but i couldn't paste any of this for some reason, but it looks like very interesting reconstruction data on the accident and the impact injuries on JO's arm.

It looks like this could be the last P witness. I will see if I can find another link to post the detail.
I heard most of the actual testimony. He was good.
 
This is my opinion only.

This testimony is extremely important but can get dry. However, for me it hasn't been, this guy cracks me up. He is an exceptional witness, absolutely imo. He is polite to Alessi but when Alessi tries to put words in his mouth, he lets him KNOW IT and stops it lmao. Alessi is not getting what he wants from him which imo is to twist his words and puts words in his mouth and to try to force him to agree with him. He corrects Alessi a lot leaving him looking kind of dumb imo. Personally I think Alessis is probably purposely getting things wrong and trying to get him to agree to things that he refuses to.

One response yesterday: NO (said strongly), WHEREEVER did you get that idea? He says such loudly (not overly but enough for jury to notice) and it's funny. He also tells him he has things wrong, terms wrong, doesn't know what he's talking of, etc. He doesn't miss a beat if the D is trying to twTheyist his words.

On the D behalf, they need to discredit him but it is NOT working.

It also clearly shows the D type of behavior, it is showing Alessi flat out as someone who is just trying to twist words imo.

Guaranteed Alessi went home battleworn.

Witness other times is always polite, agrees at times, says thank you lol but he will not put up with falsehoods being stated, etc.

Today he is fighting to get the upper hand.

My opinion. I've quite enjoyed it.
 
OMG, Alessii had a tantrum whining to the judge, acting like a child. He didn't make it long today. Since he has been getting educated by the witness lol and spends his time trying to look like he knows the same stuff.

The witness knows his stuff and is ruling. He is worth every dollar they've paid.
 
CW has rested. Brennan ended with another clip of KR in the ID series. Most of them have to do with thinking she did hit him. There are a ton of clips put into this trial of things SHE said.
 
OMG, Alessii had a tantrum whining to the judge, acting like a child. He didn't make it long today. Since he has been getting educated by the witness lol and spends his time trying to look like he knows the same stuff.

The witness knows his stuff and is ruling. He is worth every dollar they've paid.
I did wonder when he said he bought a new Lexus for an enormous amount of money. He is clearly the best but the P are getting their money's worth - i am glad and it is about time the D get someone contradicting them big time. I am just sick of him asking questions and tagging "Correct?" on the end, expecting the witnesses to just weakly answer "Yes".
 
I did wonder when he said he bought a new Lexus for an enormous amount of money. He is clearly the best but the P are getting their money's worth - i am glad and it is about time the D get someone contradicting them big time. I am just sick of him asking questions and tagging "Correct?" on the end, expecting the witnesses to just weakly answer "Yes".
Alessi? Yeah he's sickening. His juvenile games probably work with a lot of witnesses but it sure did not with this one. I call it D Hollywood kind of b.s. but he's even poorer than that at it.

The witness said in CA these cars at times go for more than they paid new. CA is crazy, wrong leadership or something I guess for too long. If it goes for more than the P actually gets a credit. If less, then they only pay the difference.

Alessi tried to grandstand everything, just usual tactics and it didn't work. Witness made it clear yes, they do work to do this and yes they bill and get paid, so what? So funny to see the D trying to make some big deal of that when they ALWAYS do such. Often P witnesses are free.

Judge called trial off already for day to take things up I guess before D starts, let jury go, so that's already it for today.
 
I did wonder when he said he bought a new Lexus for an enormous amount of money. He is clearly the best but the P are getting their money's worth - i am glad and it is about time the D get someone contradicting them big time. I am just sick of him asking questions and tagging "Correct?" on the end, expecting the witnesses to just weakly answer "Yes".
About time the D get someone? Or did you mean P?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,262
Messages
295,823
Members
1,093
Latest member
moscorosco
Back
Top Bottom