I haven't looked at it yet but competency is different. They restore them to competency and then they stand trial. That's what happened in Daybell. It's pretty rare anyone is found to be truly insane by the legal definition. I'd go so far as to say ALMOST unheard of.I remembered a Delphi murder where there was an insanity plea but couldn't find it. However, I did find this current case, which relates to a Purdue student murdering another student. Might be worth keeping an eye on this case for some info.
If he is found NGBRI then he should still get it then right?No, California has a slayer law. We were talking about it earlier in this thread.
Per AI:
California's
Slayer Law (Probate Code § 250) prevents a person who feloniously and intentionally kills someone from inheriting from the victim's estate, including wills, trusts, insurance, and jointly held property, treating them as if they died before the victim to prevent profiting from their crime, though it doesn't apply to accidental killings or involuntary manslaughter.
Key Provisions
- Prohibition on Inheritance: The killer forfeits any property, interest, or benefit they would have received from the decedent's estate.
- Broad Application: This rule covers wills, trusts, intestate succession (dying without a will), life insurance, joint tenancy, and even nominations as a fiduciary (executor, trustee).
- "Slayer" Definition: Applies to those who "feloniously and intentionally" kill, not those who kill accidentally, in self-defense, or by negligent homicide.
TMZ video. They are saying that Nick will be found NGBRI (not guilty by reason of insanity).
His meds were changed a month before the murders and he went off the rails.
I have watched the beginning 5 minutes until the guest came on.
Now that's a good theory. They may want him to have a decent defense but at the cost of maligning their parents...? To the national and beyond public??One of the videos I was watching mentioned this and I think it is another very strong possibility. The family may have decided they didn’t want to support him because of his defense strategy. If he was going to try to make it sound like it was the fault of his parents, which wouldn’t surprise me given the kind of person he is, they might’ve said “no way we’re gonna let that happen”.
I’ve seen it done before! Remember Casey Anthony?Now that's a good theory. They may want him to have a decent defense but at the cost of maligning their parents...? To the national and beyond public??
The Menendez brothers did it as well.I’ve seen it done before! Remember Casey Anthony?![]()
I think it's possible that Nick, himself, wasn't onboard with the defense strategy.One of the videos I was watching mentioned this and I think it is another very strong possibility. The family may have decided they didn’t want to support him because of his defense strategy. If he was going to try to make it sound like it was the fault of his parents, which wouldn’t surprise me given the kind of person he is, they might’ve said “no way we’re gonna let that happen”.
Could be. All anyone has is speculation. TMZ says they don't think it was about the money and they seem to have an insider but they also seem to have an agenda, and who knows if they really know this.I think it's possible that Nick, himself, wasn't onboard with the defense strategy.
Maybe that's what he wants, maybe that's his choice.Could be. All anyone has is speculation. TMZ says they don't think it was about the money and they seem to have an insider but they also seem to have an agenda, and who knows if they really know this.
The thing is if he didn't like the strategy, then he/they could have hired another private attorney though... He has public defenders.
You can't choose public defenders if you have money. You have to be low enough in money/income.Maybe that's what he wants, maybe that's his choice.
I don't know the reason for a public defender, but I do think he may not want financial help.You can't choose public defenders if you have money. You have to be low enough in money/income.
Not sure why you think that, he seems the type to have leeched his entire life, never putting a roof over his own head.I don't know the reason for a public defender, but I do think he may not want financial help.
If he is going to plead NGBRI then wouldn't it be a waste for him to hire a private attorney anyway? I mean he would then have to be incarcerated wouldn't he?Not sure why you think that, he seems the type to have leeched his entire life, never putting a roof over his own head.
Granted he has to be fairly destitute to get a public defender but that doesn't mean that's his choice but more likely the say of family or conditions in the will.
No. Again he can't file that without an insanity finding. And even if he got one, they would got to a mental hospital. Not following this. Any which way he is likely to be convicted and most think actually that if you have money for a "GOOD" private attorney you get a better defense so I'm not sure what you mean.If he is going to plead NGBRI then wouldn't it be a waste for him to hire a private attorney anyway? I mean he would then have to be incarcerated wouldn't he?
4
4
4
4