• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

Canada LILY & JACK SULLIVAN: Missing from Pictou County, Nova Scotia - 2 May 2025 - Ages 6 & 4 (3 Viewers)

sullivan.jpg

Lily Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, were reported missing around 10 a.m. Friday. They were last seen on Gairloch Road in Lansdowne Station.

Police believe the siblings wandered away from their home and say there is no information to suggest they were abducted.
<snip>
Martell says he and Malehya Brooks-Murray asked Lily and Jack to quiet down on Friday morning to let the baby sleep.

He estimates it took up to 20 minutes to notice the two children were gone.

“A few minutes went by, I heard nothing. Got up, went out in the kitchen, checked everything, I seen they weren’t there. Checked their bedrooms and they weren’t there. So I looked out the backyard, that’s the only other place they would go, and their boots were gone. The door, the sliding door, was closed. Usually they don’t close the door, I usually have to remind them, remind them to close the door over and over,” he says.

Martell says he then jumped in his vehicle and started looking for them.


media link: LILY & JACK SULLIVAN wandered off from their Pictou County, NOVA SCOTIA home on May 2, 2025 and are still MISSING!
 
Last edited:
This is from Maritime Happenings on FB:

Warrants in Jack and Lilly Sullivan case raise questions but have few answers

If there are clues for finding Lilly and Jack Sullivan in the warrant documents, they’re redacted.

If there’s hope, it can be taken from the extent and thoroughness they show of the efforts by RCMP investigators and search and rescue teams that have been seeking the two missing Pictou County children since they were reported missing from their Lansdowne Station home on May 2.
The documents used by police to get warrants were unsealed last week in response to a legal challenge by the Canadian Press, the Globe and Mail and CBC.
While heavily edited, they show an exhaustive investigative effort that includes polygraph tests of the children’s immediate family (they passed), checking of banking information and electronic communication, search histories and GPS co-ordinates of cellphones, pumping of area septic systems and searching the contents, collecting video from private cameras within an eight-kilometre radius along with businesses and school buses travelling in the area that morning and the Cobequid Pass toll booth (over 5,000 videos and photos), following up on 670 tips, interviewing those who had contact with and knew the children or their family, and conducting a massive search of the property, forest and lakes surrounding the rural home.
There’s more, too, but those efforts are redacted out of concern they would interfere with the investigation and, in some cases, violate the privacy of those involved.They said they could hear Jack and Lilly playing in the kitchen, and that Lilly at multiple points looked into the bedroom.
After a while of not hearing the children, Martell went out to check on them and they were gone, along with their boots and Lilly’s backpack. A wrench he’d wedged in the top of the front door the night before to prevent a black bear from pushing it open was still there, meaning the only other way out was the back sliding door.
Martell’s mother, Janie MacKenzie, who lived in the backyard in a camper, said she’d heard the children playing outside that morning, fallen back asleep and awoke to Martell calling their names.
Martell then took the family car to go looking for them, searching the woods and culverts. That evening he got friends to join the search.
Brooks-Murray called 911 at about 10 a.m.
The last time Jack and Lilly were confirmed to have been seen in public was the day before, at 2:45 p.m. at the Dollarama in New Glasgow. The children had been off school that day due to coughs. They, Martell and Brooks-Murray are on security camera footage at the store.
However, the RCMP interviewed a woman who said she saw children resembling Jack and Lilly while travelling the Gairloch Road on May 2 between 9:30 a.m. and 10 a.m.
The woman said she saw a girl holding a young boy’s hand walking down the side of the road toward Westville. She said the girl was white, with darkish hair in pig tails and wearing a tank top with blue strings. She estimated the girl’s age at nine or 10 and the boy to be five.
The witness said that just ahead of the children was a white woman estimated to be 50 to 60, with a “loose curl” haircut. She stood by an older-model light gold or tan sedan that was parked on the shoulder with the rear passenger door open.
“Investigators are working to identify the children seen by (the witness) to determine if they are Lilly and Jack,” reads the investigator comments.
RCMP also received a report from an employee at a hotel in New Brunswick, the name and location of which are redacted, who claimed to have seen the children’s biological father, Cody Sullivan, with Jack and Lilly. The father, who has been separated from the mother since October 2021, told RCMP he was at home (location redacted) on May 2, didn’t know where the children were and had had no contact with Brooks-Murray.
As did Wade Paris, boyfriend of Brooks-Murray’s mother, Cindy Murray.
Janie Mackenzie, mother to Martell, was found to have physiology “not suitable for analysis and an opinion on the polygraph examination was not rendered.”

BOOT PRINTS
Search and rescue teams discovered child-sized boot prints on the pipeline through the woods some distance behind the family home at 1407 Gairloch Rd. between the evening of their disappearance and the following Saturday morning.

“There were clumps of them and they were two different sizes,” reads an RCMP synopsis of what they were told by Amy Hansen, who co-ordinated the massive effort involving hundreds of ground search and rescue volunteers, drones, helicopters and police sniffer dogs.
“She said they were small in size and corresponded to what children would wear.”
A cast was taken of one of the boot prints and it was found to have a 29 marked on its tread. That number corresponded to the tread of a size 11 child’s boot.

Using Brooks-Murray’s banking records, RCMP were able to see that she had purchased size 11 children’s boots for Lilly at Walmart in March. RCMP purchased some of the same boots from Walmart for their investigation.
“(Search and rescue) heard reports of people with kids out searching,” reads the RCMP synopsis of the investigation into the boots.
“So they were not sure the boot prints belonged to Lilly and Jack. They did think it was an out of the way area for people to bring their kids to search.”
Mackenzie told RCMP she didn’t believe the children would have wandered away into the woods.
“Janie said Jack would not go for a walk on his own,” reads the RCMP synopsis of Mackenzie’s statement.
“She said she, Jack, Lilly and Daniel went for walks in the woods all the time and they had to carry Jack sometimes because he got tired and would just sit in one place. Janie said she does not believe the kids are in the woods.”

Pink blanket
On the evening of the Friday that Jack and Lilly disappeared, family members found a torn piece of pink blanket in bushes off the Lansdowne Station Road, a kilometre from the home. Below it on the ground were some rags. Brooks-Murray and Martell confirmed it was a piece of Lilly’s blanket.
An RCMP dog unit searched the area but picked up no scent.
On May 4, another part of a blanket was found in a garbage bag at the end of the family’s driveway. Brooks-Murray said the blanket had most recently been used around the edge of a drafty window in their trailer.

Relationship
Brooks-Murray and Martell had been together for three years as of May. She said that while Martell was not the father of Jack and Lilly, he was an involved parent and that he would help her, especially when she was overwhelmed.
“He was not aggressive with the kids but had a voice they listened to,” reads the RCMP synopsis of her statements.

“There was never any physical discipline.”

Martell worked one day a week at a sawmill in Westville. Family members said Martell and Brooks-Murray were struggling financially.
The day the children disappeared, Brooks-Murray took their baby and left to stay with her mother. She told the RCMP that decision caused conflict between her and Martell’s family.
She also blocked him on messenger apps.
Both Martell and Brooks-Murray said they kept the location option on their phones open all the time so they could see their whereabouts. They provided their phones to the RCMP.
 
Okay. They also state the child did not want it any longer. Does say sent in for processing though.

Tons of info in the above two articles, some bringing more questions than answers.

I'd like to know what questions were asked but of course they were redacted (in the polygraphs I mean). I keep thinking of, does anyone recall, in early reporting there was something about him yelling at them they were going to wake the baby or to go away or something. I recall commenting about it that he didn't sound as if he was very nice to them, etc. That's always bothered me but it also seemed to not come up further later on and was kind of just forgotten, not much mentioned.

Mom said he had a voice they listened to. If they thought he told them to leave, get lost, etc., WOULD they take him seriously which one might at that age?

And you would pass a polygraph if never asked that specific question. Did you tell them to leave? Rather than did you hut

them for instance.

Still would not explain what happened to them but maybe they are in the woods or water...

It is one thing that has always nagged at me as it gave me my very first impression of him.

Not sure what to think any longer. Apparently all family except his mother passed polygraphs and she could not take one. Of course that is again passing those specific yes/no questions and again what all did they ask.

I'd say cllearly the guy who claimed he saw them and their dad in a hotel was wrong or he called in a false tip. Odd that she claimed in the middle of the night the dad took them?? He sounds more llike a deadbeat dad to me, never saw them, probably was not paying.

The woman who saw children and a woman on the road may be truthfull and that's a tough one to totally let go of. And WHY did mom leave and cut off contact with him?

They struggled financially the one article says and that seemed pretty clear from the start, now we hear he works one day a week and that isn't much and I'd say is unusuall.

He had to put a wrench or something in a door so a bear did not just push it open and get in. And used an old blanket to stopo a draft with a window. Sounds like anything that wanted in could get in pretty easily if it wanted and what a way to live smh...

Doing laundry at was it her grandma's? I wonder if they even have running water. And how they heat in the winter--does Canada have energy assistance?
 

Tips still coming in on missing Pictou County kids​

The RCMP are saying little about the continuing search for two missing Pictou County children.

While the police agency has confirmed it will be doing a search using cadaver dogs, they offered little else.

“I’m not able to confirm the dates, time and locations at this time,” said spokesperson Cindy Bayers, stating that it might compromise the investigation, as well as officer safety.


Their paternal grandmother recently told media outlets that she believes the children are deceased.

When asked about the grandmother’s comments, Bayers replied that “we have no specific reason to indicate the children are deceased.”

She also stated that RCMP will put out a media release once the cadaver dog search is complete.

"Our investigation will continue until we know what has happened to Lilly and Jack," Bayers said.

"We have received more than 820 tips to date, which are being assessed and followed up on, and we continue to receive tips."

All functioning video files obtained through a canvass of the Lansdowne Station and surrounding areas have been reviewed —80 formal interviews have been conducted and our forensic analysis continues and more than 1,070 tasks are assigned to the investigation."
 

820 tips received in the 5 months since Sullivan children were reported missing​

It’s been exactly five months since two Nova Scotia children went missing.

Four-year-old Jack and six-year-old Lilly Sullivan were reported missing on May 2 from their home on Gairloch Road in Lansdowne Station. Searches stretched on for weeks in the densely forested area near their home, but there has been no sign of the two.

“This remains a highly active and intensive missing persons investigation,” said an RCMP spokesperson Thursday in an email to CTV News Atlantic.


As of Thursday, the spokesperson said police anticipate providing an update on the work of human remains detection dogs next week.

“We’re unable to confirm the dates, times, or locations of the searches,” said the spokesperson.

CTV Public Safety Analyst Chris Lewis said there could be multiple reasons why cadaver dogs are being brought in.

“Either they’re acting on just another attempt to find the kids or they’re acting on some information they have,” he said.

Police previously stressed there was “nothing definitive to support the children are deceased.”

“I think the RCMP are throwing a lot of experts and a lot of resources at it,” he said. “In the meantime, it certainly doesn’t look good for these poor children, but at some point, I’m sure we’ll know what happened in some way or another.”

Lewis said he has been watching this case closely.

“Just because there’s no press conference, it doesn’t mean there’s not boots on the ground, and I know they brought in resources from other provinces. They’re doing everything they can, but they need tips, and they need the public’s help in some way because somebody out there knows something, and they’re not saying,” he said.

To date, RCMP said investigators have received more than 820 tips, all of which are being “carefully assessed and followed up on.” Police also noted investigators have reviewed all viable video files collected during the canvass of Lansdowne Station and the surrounding areas, conducted 80 formal interviews, and continue to pursue forensic analysis.

“Our team remains fully committed to utilizing every available resource to move this investigation forward and determine the circumstances of Lilly and Jack’s disappearance,” said the spokesperson.
 

Cadaver dogs fail to find human remains in search for missing Nova Scotia children​

Police in Nova Scotia say no human remains have been found during recent searches for two young missing siblings in Pictou County.

Last month, the RCMP announced cadaver dogs would begin searching for four-year-old Jack and six-year-old Lilly Sullivan, who were reported missing from their home in Lansdowne Station on May 2.

Police say Insp. Luke Rettie and his police dog Narc, as well as Sgt. Dave Whalen and his police dog Kitt, conducted searches in the Lansdowne Station area, covering a total of 40 kilometres, in late September.

The teams, which are specially trained to detect human remains, searched the property on Gairloch Road where the children disappeared from on May 2.

They also searched along a pipeline and intersecting trails as well an area where a pink blanket belonging to Lilly was found the day the children were reported missing.

The areas were where there was the “highest probability” of finding the children, however, police previously stressed there was “nothing definitive to support the children are deceased.”

“The dogs are highly trained to detect and indicate the scent of human remains, therefore, if the dogs did not alert their handlers, it suggests the dogs were never in the presence of human remains odour,” said Staff Sgt. Stephen Pike with the RCMP Police Dog Services’ Training Centre.

“However, this doesn’t definitively rule out the presence of remains in the areas that were searched. It means either the odour is there and couldn’t be detected or the odour isn’t there.”
 
I think what bothers me the most about the parents is first the step dad claims he is the one that did everything for them but he can't answer simple questions about the simplest of things you would know if you did actually do all that then we have the mom of these missing kids just flat out taking off and deleting all contact with the step dad that is the father of her infant immediately when, at the time, the kids could have possibly wandered back home if they were just lost in the woods. Something just isn't right with this entire story. There's far more that bothers me, but these are the two that really stand out to me.

If these parents were actually that bad, maybe the kids did take off on their own and I don't think I could blame them if they weren't so young.
 
I don't think these kids ever wandered off and I think the whole thing smells.

The mom leaving I entertain a few possible reasons for. Not only did she move, she cut off all contact with him which he himself has stated.

Both families were fighting after the disappearance. It is his family's property, not hers.

She also could be cooperating.

Another thought is her leaving with the baby maybe safeguarded the baby from being taken.

I recall at the beginning of this case, it was said or he said he yelled at the two kids about waking or not waking the baby and what was it to go away or to go outside or something? Anyway, my first impression with the case was hmm, I don't think he treats these children great that aren't his and is probably all about the baby who was his. Just an impression it was. He later then starts talking differently about how much he cared and so on. That remark of his also seems never to come up any longer but I haven't forgotten it, just the exact words of it.

I do allow for the thought that the kids left as he told them too and they felt unwanted. I doubt he told the entire truth even admitting to that remark or made it as bad as it likely was.

Overall though I don't think they just left.

He has stayed on my radar throughout. To me he almost makes too much of a point now of how he searches, how he cares, etc. I'm not sure where I'm at as far as she is concerned. I'd have to know more.

One thing is certain. It would take a saint to live in those circumstances, in an unfit dwelling, penniless, with three young children and not be stressed to the max. Add to the mix if he had issues with her kids, if there were any drugs or alcohol involved, and so on and so on. It also wasn

't a stable or good relationship or she wouldn't have left and never looked back at him once the way it sounds (cut off all contact).

I suspect they don't have enough and are waiting or building a case, hoping to get more, and of course hoping to find the children.

This is where I'm at based on what we know which certainly isn't the all of it. I'm not 100 percent on anything. I do think they could have left if they felt unwanted and told to but it's not where Iean.
 
These kids were seemingly neglected by both of them, one of them being their bio parent so I hold her even more accountable for their neglect. I do not believe they were autistic. I believe their issues were from neglect.
 
The other report i remember is that vehicles were coming and going thru the night. Anyone else remember that? WTH was that about?

(See posts 295 and 296.)
 
Last edited:
Page 15 if anyone wants to know.

He said the same vehicle in and out about six times. That doesn't make much sense to me with any scenario I can think of. Offhand anyhow. It also would not appear to be their vehicle or one would think he'd know the sound if so.
 
These kids were seemingly neglected by both of them, one of them being their bio parent so I hold her even more accountable for their neglect. I do not believe they were autistic. I believe their issues were from neglect.
If neglect was all it was even.
 

Documents reveal new witness statements to RCMP about missing N.S. children​

The RCMP has agreed to release new information about the disappearance of two children from their home in rural Nova Scotia, including accounts from witnesses who said they heard a vehicle going back and forth nearby, a few hours before the kids were reported missing.


In August, the police force had released redacted versions of the documents that included other revelations of their investigation, including a timeline of what happened after the children disappeared and details of the early days of the police investigation. On Friday, The Canadian Press obtained new copies of the documents with fewer redactions.

Included among the newly released information are summaries of police conversations with two residents who live nearby and say they heard a vehicle shortly before the children disappeared.


The documents say one of those residents, Brad Wong, told police on May 9 that in the early hours of May 2 he heard a loud vehicle coming and going from the family’s home on Gairloch Road.

Wong told police his house is at an elevated position from Martell’s home and he could also see vehicle lights over the treetops that night, the police documents say. Wong also said the vehicle left their address three or four times after midnight and into the early morning hours, according to the documents.

The documents say Wong told police he heard the vehicle stop and return, remaining in earshot the entire time.

About a week after they spoke to Wong, police say they spoke to Justin Smith, the other nearby resident. Police say Smith told them on May 17 that he had spoken to Wong about the vehicle and that he also heard it in the early hours of the morning on May 2.

Police say Smith told them the vehicle was on Highway 289 and turned around by the railroad tracks near the area of Gairloch Road and Lansdowne Station Road.

According to the documents, Smith said he later spoke with Wong, who told him the vehicle he heard early that morning belonged to Daniel. Smith said Wong told him he had heard the loud vehicle come and go five or six times that night.

The documents do not indicate whether anyone else reported hearing the vehicle.



In an interview on Friday, Martell said claims that he was driving back and forth late at night are “complete nonsense.”

“My vehicle never moved out of the yard that night. And it never moved out of that yard the following day,” he told The Canadian Press over the phone.

He added that at that time, the vehicle the family was using belonged to Murray-Brooks, and that it was “not a loud vehicle by any stretch of the imagination.”



An affidavit sworn by Cpl. Charlene Jordan Curl of the RCMP’s Northeast Nova Scotia major crime unit, says Brooks-Murray provided police with a video recording on a SanDisk Cruzer Glide USB of a phone conversation between her grandmother Patti Pearson and Pearson’s relative Darin Geddes.

According to the document, Geddes claimed to know information about the disappearance of Lilly and Jack and had suggested in social media postings that Brooks-Murray may have been involved in their disappearance, however it’s stressed that “this is his theory.”

The document says Geddes also suggested that he might know the location of the children, although police talked with him and say “he has not provided context as to why he has this theory.”

Police said they sought a records access order to review the video recording.

“It is unknown if Darin Geddes knew he was being recorded,” Jordan Curl said in the document. “I believe information provided in the recording could assist with locating the children by identifying further investigational avenues for police to pursue.”

The USB was given to police at the Bible Hill, N.S., RCMP detachment on June 26 and police say the video of a phone conversation was made on the evening of June 21.

Police say the video recording captured Pearson holding her home phone on speaker so her conversation with Geddes could be heard, although police do not specifically discuss details of the conversation.

RCMP also say they had previously met with Geddes on May 30 when he told them he wanted to provide information on the disappearance of the children, but he became “confrontational and evasive” when asked questions, and he wanted police to provide him with information about the investigation.

“He became upset when his questions were not answered,” police say.

Meanwhile, police say an interview was posted on a YouTube channel related to the disappearance of the children entitled “It’s a Criming Shame.” The interview is with a person identified as Derwood O’Grady, whom police believe is a “pseudonym for a male believed to be Malehya’s grandmother’s cousin and is potentially Geddes.”

During the interview, the person identified as O’Grady made it clear that what he was saying “could be wrong, could be speculation.”

Police say that Brooks-Murray later told them that Geddes uses the name Derwood O’Grady on social media.

The documents also reveal that Brooks-Murray provided a statement to police saying she used a smartphone messaging application called TextPlus to call her mother and her grandmother after Lilly and Jack went missing, and that she used this because it allowed her to make phone calls using a wireless internet service. Police say Brooks-Murray told them she later deleted the software because she didn’t need it anymore.

Police say they requested Brooks-Murray’s records from TextPlus Inc., specifically her records between May 1 and 2. The documents reveal they received results from this request, but other details were redacted.
 
Well this new info sounds pretty suspicious - not sure if it has anything to do with the kids disappearance though. It seems nobody knows where or even when for sure the kids disappeared.
 
I don't know what to make of the info from those two witnesses. To me, their info doesn't correlate; it doesn't sound to me like they heard the same loud vehicle.
 
I don't know what to make of the info from those two witnesses. To me, their info doesn't correlate; it doesn't sound to me like they heard the same loud vehicle.
Sounds to me like they are trying to be relevant but really have nothing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,183
Messages
273,400
Members
1,061
Latest member
CDSFKD
Back
Top Bottom