Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *TRIAL IN PROGRESS* (18 Viewers)

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
wasn't in the mood for this one today. finally went in and Alessi with more drama. Have it playing right now but about ready to shut off lol.
 
Tresir said:
Yeah i know but how would we know? The feds don't share their reasoning do they? We know sh!t about any fed investigation. Same as the jury actually.
Click to expand...
I agree. Maybe she meant it rhetorically. The subject has come up in hearings and that is likely as much as can be found on it. Not sure we even know fully why the feds got them. I sure can't give the answer.
 
I watched a small part of the ME witness testimony today. I thought her evidence about the cause of his head injuries was very good and thorough. Specifically the bit about the wound on the back of his head and how it caused the racoon eyes.
 
Tresir said:
I watched a small part of the ME witness testimony today. I thought her evidence about the cause of his head injuries was very good and thorough. Specifically the bit about the wound on the back of his head and how it caused the racoon eyes.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't know and wasn't in the mood so didn't go back to see anything on it. If she was the same one they were doing voir dire on in the morning, she came across to me as very almost a bit juvenile and inexperienced although trying to act like an expert and it not really working trying to get around some questions. They wanted her to be seen as a dog bite expert and she quite clearly was not. Did she have a number of years in general things? Yes. Specific experience in any area? Or expertise? No.

If that's the best they can do, they are still in trouble imo. Of course lucky for them jury did not see the voir dire.

I just really had no desire to even do a recap for anything I missed. They are so clearly trying to drum up enough to make a fairytale, this time totally expected by the P, and don't have anyone quality so far to do it that I'm just not that into the b.s.

The minute I thought Daybelll was on I was done with the b.s. and left. Then Daybell was somewhat delayed but regardless, I was not coming back to this one. I think I've given it and the D has had what? Four days now? They haven't managed a thing and all of it has been anticipated this time. Great job by the P throughout imo. Very well prepared.
 
Won't be long now hopefully.



When will Karen Read's defense rest?​

Rentschler worked with crash reconstructionist Dr. Andrew Wolfe at the engineering consulting firm ARCCA, which has been at the center of contentious hearings throughout Read's trial. Wolfe finished testifying Monday after two days on the stand.

Jackson said he expected to question Rentschler for about three hours, possibly more, as the final defense witness. When Rentschler is done on the stand, Brennan said he plans to call several rebuttal witnesses.

Once all witness testimony is finished in the coming days, closing statements will be held and the jury will get the case.

Rentschler will be the 11th defense witness called. Brennan called 38 witnesses so far, with more now expected.

Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. Read's first trial in 2024 ended with a mistrial due to a "starkly divided" hung jury.
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
Won't be long now hopefully.



When will Karen Read's defense rest?​

Rentschler worked with crash reconstructionist Dr. Andrew Wolfe at the engineering consulting firm ARCCA, which has been at the center of contentious hearings throughout Read's trial. Wolfe finished testifying Monday after two days on the stand.

Jackson said he expected to question Rentschler for about three hours, possibly more, as the final defense witness. When Rentschler is done on the stand, Brennan said he plans to call several rebuttal witnesses.

Once all witness testimony is finished in the coming days, closing statements will be held and the jury will get the case.

Rentschler will be the 11th defense witness called. Brennan called 38 witnesses so far, with more now expected.

Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. Read's first trial in 2024 ended with a mistrial due to a "starkly divided" hung jury.
Click to expand...
I have thought throughout here that rebuttal is going to be good. That thought has struck me many a time. The D has failed to even take off this time imo. Oh there has been an attempt or two but nowhere near prepared for it as the P was. Just shows the difference such can make. The first time was a planned ambush. Not this time.

Far more fair and as it should be.

This is a case some will never agree on so I know not all will agree with that but when the blinders are clear, that's the truth. It's been an attempt by using media, the public and you name it to try to create a fairy tale. With no real basis, there never was one.

Anyhow the jury is what matters. And if there were truly people that remained in a jury pool the D tried to taint forever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 19 (members: 0, guests: 19)

Forum statistics

Threads
3,090
Messages
259,936
Members
1,027
Latest member
Belle
Back
Top Bottom