As I know you understand full well, it's a waste of time to even try to discuss the case with Read's supporters.It was proven months ago here that that is not true but certain people chose to ignore it. Again watch the trial or parts of it at least.
"Near the lightbulb" is how Read described it. To y knowledge, she didn't say what she did with those pieces.Yes. It shows a small hole in it. Not shattered into oblivion as 40+ pieces would make. That's easy enough to see.
Yet the piece they "found" days later, by itself, was BIGGER than the hole it showed before the car was taken to the Sally port. That had absolutely nothing to do with what she might have done with any pieces she picked out. I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand. That small hole they showed in no way was missing 45 pieces with any large pieces at all."Near the lightbulb" is how Read described it. To y knowledge, she didn't say what she did with those pieces.
Her defense questioned (to put it nicely) Jennifer and Kerry as to whether Read pointed out her broken taillight- along with ring video of Read's arrival at John's from Fairview, this particular part was also missing- and then we hear Read in an interview fully supporting their tstimony. LMAO!
Last I checked, nobody was forcing anybody to comment on this thread, or any thread, nor is anybody that states they are tired of this case being forced to read about it. Seems easy enough for people unhappy with how this case went to not participate in it.As I know you understand full well, it's a waste of time to even try to discuss the case with Read's supporters.
I remember the accusation that the police tried to commit Read- I remember a video of some man on the courthouse steps ranting and raving through a bullhorn about how awful Read was treated by the police when it was actually Read's father who'd contacted the police for help because Read was talking about killing herself!
Now, I haven't heard that particular accusation since then- I think that was before the first trial- but it's an example of the bs fed to supporters.
As I know you understand full well, it's a waste of time to even try to discuss the case with Read's supporters.
I remember the accusation that the police tried to commit Read- I remember a video of some man on the courthouse steps ranting and raving through a bullhorn about how awful Read was treated by the police when it was actually Read's father who'd contacted the police for help because Read was talking about killing herself!
Now, I haven't heard that particular accusation since then- I think that was before the first trial- but it's an example of the bs fed to supporters.
You need to let it go. I for one dont believe she was being railroaded. After all, she did it. She knew where to find him but by the time she did anything it was too late. That will haunt her the rest of her life. She is one lucky defendant to get away with killing someone and just getting probation.All you have to do is read about the original Sallyport video to nail down that she was being railroaded.
No, I won't provide links, because I already have. Look through this thread.
Yeah i remember and have seen it a couple of times but some people want to believe that LE smashed it and planted the shards in his clothes and face, even though she stated she pulled a piece out of his nose. How did that get in his nose?You may have forgot that dashcam video from a police vehicle at John's that morning (to see about the kids) shows the state of Read's broken taillight.
Also- you may not know that she spoke about her, herself, having picked out broken pieces of taillight from near the lightbulb.
Even the jury knew she was drunk though so she is guilty. She knows it too. People can treat her like an innocent saint but it is false. She literally got away with murder. The civil case is still to be heard too, unless she settles. If its true they only want $50k, then she should do a deal.I am not a Read supporter. I'm a justice supporter. Don't you think that the jurors had the best look at ALL of the evidence? Both of them. They saw what @Guess Who and I also saw.
It's useless to argue with people who don't have all the facts presented to the jury, but still believe she's guilty.
The people with the greatest look at everything didn't see it. How can you say they're mistaken based on a lot less evidence?
I don't think anyone feels forced to do anything.Last I checked, nobody was forcing anybody to comment on this thread, or any thread, nor is anybody that states they are tired of this case being forced to read about it. Seems ready enough for people unhappy with how this case went to not participate in it.
There's no doubt in my mind that all of us are justice supporters!I am not a Read supporter. I'm a justice supporter. Don't you think that the jurors had the best look at ALL of the evidence? Both of them. They saw what @Guess Who and I also saw.
It's useless to argue with people who don't have all the facts presented to the jury, but still believe she's guilty.
The people with the greatest look at everything didn't see it. How can you say they're mistaken based on a lot less evidence?
Well i am quite happy to set the record straight when necessary. The drunk is on probation.Last I checked, nobody was forcing anybody to comment on this thread, or any thread, nor is anybody that states they are tired of this case being forced to read about it. Seems easy enough for people unhappy with how this case went to not participate in it.
We didn't see the same thing.Yet the piece they "found" days later, by itself, was BIGGER than the hole it showed before the car was taken to the Sally port. That had absolutely nothing to do with what she might have done with any pieces she picked out. I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand. That small hole they showed in no way was missing 45 pieces with any large pieces at all.
Oh I recall THAT WELL. Daddy rushed to save her pulling that. I thought of it when I was watching him the other day. I'd like to hear from dad about raising her and her mental health and alcohol reliance.As I know you understand full well, it's a waste of time to even try to discuss the case with Read's supporters.
I remember the accusation that the police tried to commit Read- I remember a video of some man on the courthouse steps ranting and raving through a bullhorn about how awful Read was treated by the police when it was actually Read's father who'd contacted the police for help because Read was talking about killing herself!
Now, I haven't heard that particular accusation since then- I think that was before the first trial- but it's an example of the bs fed to supporters.
Yep true. Just like some were not that had been until a verdict came down.Last I checked, nobody was forcing anybody to comment on this thread, or any thread, nor is anybody that states they are tired of this case being forced to read about it. Seems easy enough for people unhappy with how this case went to not participate in it.
Neither so far that I saw believe the crazy conspiracy theory. It was more about the investigation and doubt. The ones that believed that conspiracy garbage is what realTy geI am not a Read supporter. I'm a justice supporter. Don't you think that the jurors had the best look at ALL of the evidence? Both of them. They saw what @Guess Who and I also saw.
It's useless to argue with people who don't have all the facts presented to the jury, but still believe she's guilty.
The people with the greatest look at everything didn't see it. How can you say they're mistaken based on a lot less evidence?
Very true. I hope that means she also loses her license and is on a no drink, etc.You need to let it go. I for one dont believe she was being railroaded. After all, she did it. She knew where to find him but by the time she did anything it was too late. That will haunt her the rest of her life. She is one lucky defendant to get away with killing someone and just getting probation.
Yeah and also sure, someone was out there doing different layers of sn*w planting different pieces. Get real. And paramedics and everyone else were involved in the conspiracy too. SMH.Yeah i remember and have seen it a couple of times but some people want to believe that LE smashed it and planted the shards in his clothes and face, even though she stated she pulled a piece out of his nose. How did that get in his nose?
Even the jury knew she was drunk though so she is guilty. She knows it too. People can treat her like an innocent saint but it is false. She literally got away with murder. The civil case is still to be heard too, unless she settles. If its true they only want $50k, then she should do a deal.
Lol and hopefully will be on a no drink and no license, etc. Hope she doesn't get on some YT channel drunk for her own sake lol.Well i am quite happy to set the record straight when necessary. The drunk is on probation.