Right, and I'm not saying whether I believe she got out, I'm just wondering why he said she did.Oh for sure but it doesn't mean it's true.
What if when the jurors leave they hear KR spouting BS off to media, as she does? Like saying a witness is lying for example.Yeah, it was clear from other remarks in your post that you meant the D.
Seems to be a juror issue this morning. And supposedly a KR fan got arrested yesterday.
Boy are there some true idiots in the various chats out there. Judge is questioning each juror and there are actuall people thinking this means the judge may be in trouble or have caused something and will be thrown off the case. DUH. Talk about how far dreaming the KR fan club goes. Juror questioning would only take place if it had to do with jurors, that's such a stupid thought I'm seeing from more than one person by far. I tell ya talk about living in some fantasy world and believing the stupidest of things.
Yes, tech is going to be big here and already is and the D does not like it. Additionally every witness and Brennan is getting in front of and negating what the D witnesses are going to say when they get on the stand, covering it ahead of time.In an interview clip Brennan presented in court yesterday, Read said her inadvertant vm at 12:41:35 contains background noises as she entered John's garage but since her phone comnnected to John's router at 12:36:39, she was already in the garage by that time and I think her first vm- the "John-I-*******-hate-you" vm- at 12:37:08 sounds like it was recorded from inside the garage.
Well it's to make something work for them for sure, I think we can guess that much.Right, and I'm not saying whether I believe she got out, I'm just wondering why he said she did.
You know what, she is saying all this BS to the media in the hope it gets back to the jury because she can't say it on the stand, because she's lying her arse off and she is not going to take the stand anyway.Well it's to make something work for them for sure, I think we can guess that much.
Oh for sure, that's obvious. And imo there are no lengths she won't go to as well as having someone tell the jurors and my best guess is that's what is going on here. One way or another it has something to do with jurors.You know what, she is saying all this BS to the media in the hope it gets back to the jury because she can't say it on the stand, because she's lying her arse off and she is not going to take the stand anyway.
I would be SHOCKED if she took the stand.... it will NOT do her any favorsYou know what, she is saying all this BS to the media in the hope it gets back to the jury because she can't say it on the stand, because she's lying her arse off and she is not going to take the stand anyway.
She wont, she'd be trapped in her lies.I would be SHOCKED if she took the stand.... it will NOT do her any favors
Ok a little more explanation. Something came to the judges attention that meant she had to clear out the court and speak with the attorneys and 1 juror at a time in a side bar. Once done then the jurors all were back except 2, who were in different seats. Testimony continues. Short video 2 minutes.
They are playing interview clips of KR in court? What did she mean by " her inadvertant vm". How was it inadvertant?In an interview clip Brennan presented in court yesterday, Read said her inadvertant vm at 12:41:35 contains background noises as she entered John's garage but since her phone connected to John's router at 12:36:39, she was already in the garage by that time and I think her first vm- the "John-I-*******-hate-you" vm- at 12:37:08 sounds like it was recorded from inside the garage.
Yeah, clips have been playd in court throughout the trial. There'll be testimony and then here and there, an interview clip is played for the jury.They are playing interview clips of KR in court? What did she mean by " her inadvertant vm". How was it inadvertant?
So she killed him at 12.32 and was back in JO's garage by 12.36 verbally abusing him by phone.
LOL how can you leave someone a voicemail accidentally? By not hanging up when you thought you had?Yeah, clips have been playd in court throughout the trial. There'll be testimony and then here and there, an interview clip is played for the jury.
"Inadvertant" was my word.; in court, the witness said the call appeared to be accidental. (Now I don't know what she's doing but what ever it was, it caused a lot of noise.
Had the very same thought. Either she was beyond drunk which we know she was or she doesn't want it to look like she hit him, left him to die, and then was that nasty yet to call him to say that when she got home. Imo.LOL how can you leave someone a voicemail accidentally? By not hanging up when you thought you had?
I suspect that was ANY day...You know what, i am surprised it wasn't JO murdering KR - that whole day she never gave him a minutes peace.
Yeah, he was good! I laughed outloud when he said he's sees more brains than a forensic pathologist. LMAO!That expert was GOOD. Defense hardly even questioned him lol and I can see why.
LOL, yes that was a GREAT point. Interesting defense didn't do more than a couple of questions and ended their questioning. I suspect they knew they were not going to get anywhere with this guy.Yeah, he was good! I laughed outloud when he said he's sees more brains than a forensic pathologist. LMAO!