Agree, it gets a bit dry. Alessi went on as he typically does for hours on end both yesterday and today.
You can tell it is damaging by the amount of time they spent on him. Can tell with each one they do that with.
Also my Linked In profile if I ever even finished it is probably well over 20 years old.
It fit though being under the same channel plus I think you may have it already in Daybell too.
How many times do these guys get by with lying on absolutely everything? How are people believing anything they say?The issue is not how long he took to "get his degree". He DOESN'T HAVE ONE!
So we're supposed to trust the testimony of a guy who LIED about his credentials and changed his report.
On cross-examination, Burgess was grilled on potential bias and “truthfulness” on his resume. Burgess listed on his resume provided to the court that he graduated from the University of Alabama with a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and business administration. He acknowledged an “error” his resume should have stated that he had a bachelor’s degree in general studies with a minor in math, but he later admitted he did not possess a bachelor’s degree.
MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial: Daily Trial Updates
Karen Read stood trial for a second time on charges she murdered her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.www.courttv.com
Robert Alessi, who asked the witness about the resume posted by Aperture, which lists him as having received a bachelor’s degree in 2022 in computer science and mathematics. Under cross-examination, Burgess admitted he does not have a bachelor's degree in mathematics, and in fact the school he listed does not offer one. In fact, Burgess admitted on the stand, he has been pursuing his bachelor's degree since 2008, raising questions about his company's report that tries to place blame on Read for O'Keefe's death.
"Either you have a bachelor of science degree or you don't," Alessi said at one point, after pointing out that in a new report Burgess wrote this month he changed the time of when the alleged "collision," which had been noted in earlier reports as an "incident," happened.
Witness for Prosecution in Karen Read Case Misrepresented His Resume Before Taking the Stand - LAmag
‘Either you have a bachelor's degree or you don't,' Read defense attorney asks state's expert, who then admitted to lying about his credentials on his resumelamag.com
Burgess ultimately acknowledged some of the documents provided by the defense contained “errors.” Later in his cross-examination, Alessi confirmed Burgess began pursuing a bachelor’s degree 17 years ago, in 2008.
“And you have not obtained it as you sit here today?” he pressed.
“That is correct,” Burgess replied. He chalked the discrepancies in the documents up to errors or misinterpretation.
Karen Read trial: Digital expert's credentials, methodology questioned during defense's cross
Defense attorney Robert Alessi began his cross-examination of Aperture LLC expert Shanon Burgess by putting him in the hot seat.www.boston.com
What degree does he actually hold?
I just told you in the post you answered. It is also in the thread as that's where I got the info. If you don't find it let me know and I'll pull it up.
Well you have time on your hands to finish it now girl, so get it done LOL.
You might want to change P to D in your first sentence.Here's a USA today link and some clarification by the prosecution. I can understand P trying to defame the witness as his testimony is very, very bad for their client. The time of the backing up of the vehicle collision and JO' s phone locking are within 3 seconds of each other.
Karen Read trial recap: Day 19 ends with testimony of key prosecution expert in question
A timeline of events presented by digital forensic expert Shanon Burgess suggests Karen Read could have struck John O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV.www.usatoday.com"Prosecution seeks to clarify Burgess’ credibility
Upon redirect, Brennan sought to re-establish Burgess’ credibility, starting with his academic record. He asked Burgess if he had helped develop the information listed on his biography page on the Aperture website, which incorrectly said he had a bachelor’s degree. Burgess said he didn't assist with putting the page together and didn’t know who in the company would have done so.
Brennan presented to the jury the CV Burgess provided to the court in October 2024, which indicated he was “currently pursuing” a bachelor’s degree. Burgess said he had never misrepresented his academic history in any of the numerous trials he has testified in.
The prosecutor also gave Burgess time to explain in-depth the methodology behind the timeline he created. He asked Burgess whether an event in a Lexus SUV, such as a back-up maneuver, could take longer than the 10-second window recorded by the vehicle. Burgess said it could.
In other words, Read could have still been backing up after the car finished its 10-second recording of the move at 12:32:12 a.m. on January 30, according to Burgess’ analysis. This gives prosecutors potentially more room in their timeline to suggest that Read’s SUV struck O’Keefe. His iPhone locked for the last time during that timeframe at 12:32:09 a.m."
Lol, no interest and not even sure there is one, I do remember like 1/2 doing one way back when.
All I know is that the reason doesn't make sense and that nobody got out "when they arrived" and not until after the vehicle that had been behind them had left.
But where did you hear that they did?
It was in Jackson's opening statement.
I think I do recall you saying that. Well then it certainly doesn't have to be facts in openings so I'd call that debatable at this point if there is even any basis.
Yeah, done, at least you knew what i meant.
It not even debatable, it's BS.
Well, you know, one thing's for sure; he wouldn't have said it if he didn't think it somehow explains something.
Yeah, it was clear from other remarks in your post that you meant the D.
Oh for sure but it doesn't mean it's true.