Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *NOT GUILTY* (Guilty of OUI) (13 Viewers)

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Tresir said:
There's no evidence he ever got further than that kerbside then he was covered by the snow and died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. It is a very sad situation, especially when you think how many were partying inside and could have saved him if they had known sooner. Death a result of a drunken row and an angry, drunk driver.
Click to expand...
and jealous one.

the scariest thing for me is how people fall for these later made up stories.

And a PR and public blitz.

one of the people I ended up disliking the most at JT/WS taught me one thing early on. I will give him or her that. It is that when they have to come up with too many things to create another version and there are too many coincidences it likely is not true. That has stuck with me and it is true.

This story came later, then they had to explain the abrasions. came up with the dog. The tail light. You name it.

She was running around telling the truth in the beginning. Or at least part of it. SHE hit him. She KNEW where he was.

I'm not speaking for you of course, you know that, just giving my opinion and coming off your post.

On one case back when people were speculating things like someone took a girl and then took her to Canada by boat and so on. It was absolutely ridiculous. The alternative story here is RIDICULOUS. But the scary part is they get some to believe such.

Karen Read killed her bf John OK in a drunken rage. My opinion. I hope her and Turtleboy stay close forever.
 
I just witnessed the reading of the daytime texts between JO and KR that day. Here's the link for anyone interested. 40 minutes long and covers about 12 hours of texts from approx 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on the day before he died.


 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
I just witnessed the reading of the daytime texts between JO and KR that day. Here's the link for anyone interested. 40 minutes long and covers about 12 hours of texts from approx 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on the day before he died.


Click to expand...

I was listening to him for awhile yesterday, didn't to all of it. Will have to give it a listen when I get a minute.
 
Ok this is from yesterday. The witness reading the texts, I posted about already then they showed a video of Read talking about her drinking and driving. They then had a sidebar and apparently ended for the day as witnesses were unavailable. Today they are bussing the jurors to some of the locations so there is no court.

www.boston25news.com

Judge dismisses jurors early after ‘confusion’ about witnesses on Day 3 of Karen Read’s retrial

Testimony concluded for the day after the prosecution played multiple interview clips of Read detailing her alcohol consumption in the hours before her boyfriend's death.
www.boston25news.com www.boston25news.com
 
Tresir said:
I didn't watch the first trial so how is this comparing so far? For those that saw it .
Click to expand...
I've seen some of each. I saw almost all of the first day, listened to quite a bit of the second, etc. In this one. In the first, I went back after to watch various testimony, didnt catch most live, not that that matters, it is all the same.

I think the P is doing better, there are things being asked and shown, well prepared. I watched him in arguments in hearings and I'm pretty impressed. He doesn't act all flamboyant like the D Jackson, his style is different but strong. Personally I don't think most jurors like the type that Jackson is. I'm sure some will disagree and say mostly not guilty in first trial, not many all agree in this overblown case.

I do see in chats of course that the ones who have fallen into the KR fan club say oh the D is doing great. I personally don't think they are but then I don't like them so I guess I have a bias. Lol. I find them trying to make something out of nothing and where it doesn't exist and it's very obvious to me. The P witnesses that I have seen are holding up well to wit direct and cross imo. It's interesting to watch the chats though and anyone in her fan club makes remarks about witnesses but there are plenty too that think her guilty so it's a back and forth.

I know from the pretrial hearings that Brennan really did his homework on this case and is well up to speed on it.

Defense other day supposedly was going to bring in something new, think I already mentioned it and there was a back and forth before court because you can't do that to the other side, they need to be able to prepare and voir dire the person. They got a bit of a talking to for discovery violation, think the decision was to come later. I can't recall as to which days all was but another time Brennan/The P wanted to bring in a video with KR's own statements in it, etc. and D was arguing hard against it. Was agreed first part could come in and Judge was going to decide later on second part of it or something like that.

Brennan made a great argument that KR wants to pick which of her statements DO get told and which DON'T get told and that it can't be that way. The fact she has run all over YT and the news may well bite her in her nonexistent butt lol.

I think it is going well for the P but who knows and I haven't watched all.

I watched a lot of Scott about this case prior to the trial. He's one of the few defense attys who just tells it like it is and will go against a defense or a P in evaluating other ones like this one. I could say a lot about how his tune has changed this second time around but I'll leave it for the moment. I will say generally it's not good for the D, they get their one shot, then their case is known, etc. Brennan was also brought in as a special prosecutor this time.

I could go on but will leave it there. I think it's going very well for the P but there are likely those that have a big bias the other way who would disagree lol.
 
Tresir said:
I didn't watch the first trial so how is this comparing so far? For those that saw it .
Click to expand...
I'm curious too I was working ridiculous amounts of hours during the last trial so I would literally catch glimpses in my boss's office here and there That spoiled brat had a sixty inch TV In her office while I was Sweating my ass off lol
 
Takeitfromme said:
I'm curious too I was working ridiculous amounts of hours during the last trial so I would literally catch glimpses in my boss's office here and there That spoiled brat had a sixty inch TV In her office while I was Sweating my ass off lol
Click to expand...
That is SO unfair! I've had jobs like that. Bosses arses have nice heat but I get to sit in the adjoining room freezing. Much less TV.

I went back and watched a lot of the first one when it was going on. Like get home after working, then watch some witness testimony. During it though.
 
Tresir said:
I didn't watch the first trial so how is this comparing so far? For those that saw it .
Click to expand...
The prosecution's approach to evidence is far more concise- no getting into the weeds- while the defense approach hasn't changed, except that in the first trial, they didn't touch Kerry Roberts and this time around, they did cross-examine but true to form, accused her of conspiring and lying.
 
Regina said:
I really like this DA and his approach.
And he's addressed consciousness of guilt, which for me is always fascinating.
Click to expand...
This special prosecutor has been awesome in his arguments in pretrial hearings and even now in trial before the jury is present, etc.

I mean we have Mr. Hollywood type with Jackson, can't stand that type, but this guy is just GOOD. I agree. He is going to look like the serious truth one to the jury imo.

And yes a lot has come about consciousness of guilt. He has done his homework, knows the case, has his arguments ready.
 
GrandmaBear said:
This special prosecutor has been awesome in his arguments in pretrial hearings and even now in trial before the jury is present, etc.

I mean we have Mr. Hollywood type with Jackson, can't stand that type, but this guy is just GOOD. I agree. He is going to look like the serious truth one to the jury imo.

And yes a lot has come about consciousness of guilt. He has done his homework, knows the case, has his arguments ready.
Click to expand...
Indeed! Now, does he sound to you at all like Humphrey Bogart? lol
Edit: I meant Brennan! My comment had nothing to do with your reference to Hollywood.
Just want to be clear that I was referring to Brennan but yeah, from day 1, for me, it's been like listening to Bogart, lol!
 
Last edited:
Regina said:
The prosecution's approach to evidence is far more concise- no getting into the weeds- while the defense approach hasn't changed, except that in the first trial, they didn't touch Kerry Roberts and this time around, they did cross-examine but true to form, accused her of conspiring and lying.
Click to expand...
Yep. I saw a good portion if not all of that, I don't think I saw it finish. But I saw hours of her testimony. And I saw a lot of cross and did not feel the D was getting anywhere with her.

You know, I have had times of course to see a trial through I have had to rely on recaps as I'm working, etc. but I have learned how one can't trust them from news or some sources. Delphi was horrible. I'd read news that was present supposedly but then go listen to some solid source who was also there and fairly covering far more of what went on. Imo the same goes on here. They go for the one sensational thing or you name it and it isn't their only thing of the day to do.

There is NOTHING for getting a true sense that beats watching the actual trial. I can't always, but I do know that, and I often go back later if recorded, to view such.
 
Fox news reports about the visit to the murder site. They had the car there so the jury could inspect the rear taillight and see the car position in relation to where JO's body lay. This is good IMO.

When they returned to court there was the paramedic on the stand who transported KR to the hospital. They also had the path lab technician who tested her BAC taken at 9 a.m. and it was .093, which is higher than the limit for driving, more than 9 hours after her last drink. So imagine how drunk she was at the time she hit him.

www.foxnews.com

Jurors at Karen Read murder trial visit crime scene

Karen Read pleaded not guilty to murder charges in the death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe and is facing a retrial after a jury was unable to reach a verdict last year.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Trial wraps up first week with paramedic's description of Karen Read's ambulance behavior​



Trial wraps up first week with paramedic's description of Karen Read's ambulance behavior

Canton firefighter and paramedic Jason Becker testifies during her trial, Friday, April 25, 2025, at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass. (Josh Reynolds /New York Post via AP, Pool)


The prosecution called firefighter and paramedic Jason Becker as their final witness of the day, with Becker testifying about his interaction with Karen Read in the ambulance to the local hospital after John O’Keefe’s body was discovered.

Becker said his primary role at the time was to gather information regarding Read’s mental state as she was being transported for a psychological evaluation, describing her as “agitated” at certain points but overall cooperative with first responders.

Becker also testified that Read expressed being upset that her final moments with O’Keefe consisted of the pair fighting.

Following multiple objections regarding both side’s questions surrounding Read's description of an argument with O'Keefe while speaking to Becker, Judge Beverly Cannone dismissed the jurors for the day, ending the first week of testimony in Read’s trial.
Posted by Julia BonavitaShare
21 hour(s) ago

Pathologist reveals Karen Read's blood alcohol content the morning John O'Keefe was killed​



Pathologist reveals Karen Read's blood alcohol content the morning John O'Keefe was killed

Dr. Garrey Faller reviews the medical record of defendant Karen Read as he testified during her trial, Friday, April 25, 2025, at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass. (Josh Reynolds/New York Post via AP, Pool)


Karen Read’s trial resumed following the jury’s trip to 34 Fairfield Road with the prosecution calling Dr. Garrey Faller, a lab director at Signature Healthcare. Faller previously worked as chief of pathology and laboratory medical director at Good Samaritan Medical Center at the time of John O’Keefe’s murder January 2022.

Faller’s lab drew Read’s blood samples at 9:08 a.m. on Jan. 29, 2022, with the tests finding Read’s blood alcohol level (BAC) was 93 milligrams per deciliter of alcohol, or 0.093% - above the 0.08% legal limit permitted to operate a vehicle and nine hours after she left the bar.

Faller went on to explain the methods his lab uses to test blood samples is somewhat different from forensic testing by testing liquid within the specimen using “serum tests."

Faller went on to explain the methods his lab uses to test blood samples is somewhat different from forensic testing by sampling liquid within the specimen using “serum tests.” Faller testified that the results are very close and while the lab has a clinical accreditation, it is not accredited for forensic testing.
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
It was 8 hours of constant arguments between the two.
Click to expand...
Read both or all posts above.

Yeah her BAC was high very many hours later. Imo she professed her guilt basically all over the place in the beginning. It isn't like it was just to this person that people think lying or that person, she was showing it PLENTY. The opposing story only came later.

I fell off from watching it the last day or two but from what I saw and heard, P is doing great. It was said more than once this is not going to be the same trial as the last one although, not surprised there are constant objections and arguments.

Apparently not many are watching it or certainly are not on here.

When one can, actual testimony is best. I can't take it all of the time though, but usually do go back and watch if I can. In any trial. Can't always though, and most can't either. Sometimes I just have to pick the witnesses I figure had the most information, etc. if can't do all.
 
Day 5 testimony

www.foxnews.com

Karen Read’s trial enters its second week as testimony resumes with key witnesses

Karen Read pleaded not guilty to murder charges in the death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe and is facing a retrial after a jury was unable to reach a verdict last year. The trial is entering its second week as the prosecution continues to call key witnesses.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


Day 6 testimony.

www.foxnews.com

Karen Read defense grills phone expert on John O'Keefe's final minutes as prosecution shreds theory

Karen Read pleaded not guilty to murder charges in the death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe and is facing a retrial after a jury was unable to reach a verdict last year.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Last edited:
This just came up for me so I watched it. It is Nicole Albert's testimony from the first trial. It was pretty damning for the D theory that JO went in the house. Also, LE did come into the house to wake them up and interview them, at about 6.30 a.m.

It will be interesting to see her testify again.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 14 (members: 0, guests: 14)

Forum statistics

Threads
3,103
Messages
262,156
Members
1,034
Latest member
jarad adams
Back
Top Bottom