• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

Australia CLEO SMITH: Missing from Blowholes Campground, Carnarvon, WA - 16 Oct 2021 - Age 4 *Found Alive**GUILTY PLEA*

1634441651147_GQ23GTSCN.1-2.jpg
49240407-10099619-A_frantic_search_is_underway_after_Cleo_disappeared_and_land_sea-a-1_1634449032454.jpg
49265481-10099619-The_search_has_continued_for_over_24_hours_after_the_young_girl_-a-3_1634426800608.jpg

Search continues for missing girl in WA​

The disappearance of a four-year-old girl from a WA campsite is "extremely concerning" and police say a search has yet to turn up any answers.

Cleo Smith was last seen about 1.30am on Saturday at the Blowholes campsite on the coast at Macleod, north of Carnarvon.

An air, land and sea search resumed on Sunday morning with help from the SES and community volunteers.

The girl was wearing a pink one-piece sleepsuit with a blue and yellow pattern when she was last seen.


Earlier, Ms Smith posted that she had woken at 6am on Saturday to find her daughter wasn't in their shared tent.

She described Cleo's disappearance as "very very unusual".

WA police Inspector Jon Munday said the family arrived in the area late on Friday afternoon.

Insp Munday said he was "fairly confident" police were able to get the identities of all the people who were in the campsite at the time she disappeared, as well as gathering intelligence from dashcams and CCTV cameras in the vicinity to "paint a picture of who was around here".

"We are greatly concerned for the safety of Cleo and we aren't leaving anything to chance or ruling anything out," Insp Munday said early on Sunday afternoon.

"We are going as hard as we can for as long as we can."

Insp Munday said detectives from Perth and Geraldton had arrived at the search area and despite the harsh environment, the weather was so far "conducive to someone surviving exposure to the elements", but there were still no answers or major breakthroughs in the search.


MEDIA - CLEO SMITH: Missing from Blowholes Campground, Carnarvon, WA since 16 Oct 2021 - Age 4
 
Last edited:

Million-dollar Cleo Smith reward lures bounty hunters to search for four-year-old missing from Blowholes campsite​

Western Australia's acting police commissioner says a $1 million reward offered for information to find missing four-year-old Cleo Smith has attracted bounty hunters to the area where the child was last seen.


On Wednesday, acting police commissioner Col Blanch said the million-dollar reward offered by the state government last week had led to a flurry of activity in the Blowholes area.

"As you know, a $1 million reward was put out there to help us find Cleo, and I think people — whether it's for the money, or whether it's just to do the right thing and help find Cleo — people are up there trying to find what happened," he told Nine radio.

“I just ask that people don’t put themselves in any danger in doing so."

He said police searches of the area had found nothing to conclude she had simply wandered off, but there was "still a lot of land out there to cover."
 

Search for Cleo Smith brings police back to campgrounds where little girl went missing​

Police searching for any sign of missing girl Cleo Smith have returned to the tourist hotspot she was last seen and taken new evidence.

On Wednesday, police returned to the campgrounds after earlier shifting their attention elsewhere.

They are understood to have taken ash samples from several burnt-out campfires near shacks in the area.
 
Guess it just depends on your upbringing. I camped at places with no water/electricity since I was a young child. And now I know people who backpack with very young children, including babies. Not just camping with no water/electricity, but literally carrying your food and shelter on your back for miles as well.
This family hiked the entire Appalachian Trail, 2100 miles, with their 4 year old (who turned 5 on the trail).
I know there are people who do it, I'm not saying it's never done, I just think it's not something all would choose to do. I guess I'd just like to know more. She was in school but I guess it was the weekend so it's not like she was missing school. It was the first time camping they said since the baby was born though and I think they said it was a new tent.

It does seem remote to me for a camping trip with children when one has to haul and pack everything from water to fuel to packing the children, diapers, wet wipes and more up, etc. But, as you say, some do it and feel it worthwhile I guess. I do get it when children are closer to Cleo's age.

I truly don't know what to think in this one. There are some things I don't like, for instance it being Tuesday apparently before the height of the zipper was mentioned, that's a number of days afterwards. They were just in the home and removed some items and this may be routine as they keep saying but it also shows the parents are not ruled out imo. I see some possible red flags, just a few, but I don't see any "smoking gun". It means nothing to me that they keep pointing out nothing means the parents are suspected because of course it is in their best interest to keep them cooperating. So nothing and no one is ruled out imo. Other than they have basically said the sex offenders have been cleared more or less and the bio dad. So they have done some ruling out but not of all... And that's about it.

Checking ashes at campsites is hmm... She was only missing a few hours before searches began (1:30 to 6 or something like that?0 but I guess someone could have burned a sleeping bag or other evidence.

It's too bad it was such a remote camping area or there may be a better chance of more video evidence whether from campground, nearby businesses, etc.

All I do know is 11 days out or whatever it is, the odds aren't good and I am sure loved ones must be frantic. Not sure what to think.
 
I am going to have to watch it later but The Behavior Panel is doing a show on the parents in this case right now. I also saw another video about this case I watched this morning. Just a heads up. Both on YT if anyone wants to see them. Much matches some of the things I have noticed, what I have seen so far and there are additional things pointed out...
 
So I am just starting to watch The Behavior Panel. Can't watch it all at once but will probably do it in segments here and there. The first 15 minutes, all four are finding the parents mostly believable, they think anyhow, it's never a for sure of course... There is quite a bit to go yet. I can link it if anyone wants the link.
 
So I am just starting to watch The Behavior Panel. Can't watch it all at once but will probably do it in segments here and there. The first 15 minutes, all four are finding the parents mostly believable, they think anyhow, it's never a for sure of course... There is quite a bit to go yet. I can link it if anyone wants the link.
Yes, link please & thank you! ;)
 
You bet. Here it is. I like watching these guys. They do quite a variety of types of people, not all crime. Presidents, Prince Andrew, the Ramseys, current cases.

I keep in mind it is not exact of course but they are experts in the field. And usually these guys agree but it is really interesting the rare time one thinks someone is lying and the others don't, etc.

 
They did one on UFOs that was fun. They had several different presidents who were asked at different times on TV their opinions on UFOs... They judged their answers and honesty as to what they knew or might know that the American people don't lol. While I don't and haven't liked all presidents, they played no politics and I found a president or two quite humorous and one for sure was not even a president I could stand but was interesting to listen to in that context...

Off topic so I'll stop there. Just saying they are kind of fun to watch. Some shows are better than others. They also recently did Don Wells in the Summer Wells case. Don actually went in for an interview with these guys. I haven't finished those yet either. Haven't had time.
 
Okay, it's taken awhile but I am now almost an hour in. I've been doing other things in between. It's long about 1.5 hours so more to go but interesting and getting more so now One guy is now just starting to be bothered by some things in the parents' interviews, with both of them as more clips and footage are played. And more than once now. We will see where he ends up with his thoughts at the end. There is also an interview on here that maybe others saw but I hadn't.
 
Well I finished it and it was worth it for me to watch it because they point out many things and why they might seem like red flags but are not necessarily. Some of them had questions until they watched more than one interview which occurred on different days after she went missing--there was an early on interview and one many days later for instance--and learned the parents a bit better, their expressions and more. At the end all four felt the parents are not involved. Now this is NEVER a 100 percent and they are never saying that facts surrounding and if more comes out or more footage to watch of interviews they might not change their minds but overall, they think the parents are truthful probably. They also really don't take in case facts or everything LE would, or we would maybe looking at the entire picture, they are only looking at interviews of subjects, their behavior, etc.

The bf was harder for them to learn and understand and there were more questions with him but even with him by the end they just felt he is the way he is and it is how he comes across, there was less doubt about her although all had some until they watched more than one interview over time. Even finding this unanimously to a degree, there are even then a few things they do find odd... They don't mention her name at all in the one very long interview but they do mention the baby's name... So there still are a FEW things they wonder about as well...

So that is how it turns out at the end if one doesn't have a chance to watch it.
 
I finished the 1st one as well. It was much easier to listen to than The Interview Room. This is a good one to subscribe to.

Thanks for sharing @GrandmaBear
You bet. I love these guys. I turned my mom onto them too. We keep meaning to watch the Prince Andrew one but haven't done it yet. The reason we want to watch it is to us he is so clearly lying and we want to see what they all say in a show if they all feel someone is lying. Lol. They do quite a variety of types as I mentioned.

I am not the biggest fan of the Interview Room. I have been back and forth on that guy since before he had his own channel. I've seen really good shows but then I have also seen shows that I was very upset with what he did... I don't like to just not give someone a chance or another chance so I'll just say it is not a regular one of mine and for a long time I wouldn't watch it. Then I did and it was good for a bit and then something a bit over the top happened again. Oh well.

Anyhow, I hope you enjoyed The Behavior Panel. I think they are fun and they "play" well together... Yet are top experts in their field.
 
P.S. Find and watch the UFO one just for fun. I found it very entertaining and pretty lighthearted... And yet it left me thinking what I have always thought, that presidents are told exactly what they can say and no more about UFOs and what is known... Even if they wanted to tell all, and say they will if they get in office, it left me feeling something or someone has more power than they in that they do not dare tell the people what they know and are told (that they learn if office about the truth of it) when they take office! Lol, but not. :D
 

Cleo Smith search: Police reveal detailed timeline as search for missing girl continues​

Police in Western Australia have given an almost minute-by-minute account of the first day of their investigation into Cleo Smith’s disappearance from a remote campground on October 16.


The timeline​

6.30am: A car with two officers is dispatched from the Carnarvon police station, using flashing lights and sirens.

6.41am: Another vehicle is sent with two officers and lights and sirens.

7.10am: The first police car arrives and the second arrives a few minutes later.

7.26am: Police establish a protected forensic area, taping off the tent and campsite.

7.33am: Police request a drone operator to be sent from Geraldton.

7.44am: A third police car is sent from Carnarvon.

8am: Friends and family members arrive to help search for Cleo. Detectives go to the family home in Carnarvon to look for signs of Cleo, then return to Blowholes to stop vehicles in the area.

8.11am: Police request an SES team to joing the search around the Blowholes area.

8.20am: Third police car arrives at the campsite.

8.24am: Police incident controller John Munday, from Geraldton, arranges to travel to the area with a mobile policing facility and contacts police airwing and volunteer marine searchers.

8.34am: Police set up a roadblock at the entrance to the Blowholes campsite.

9.25am: Nine SES personnel arrive and begin searching for Cleo.

9.30am: Carnarvon detectives sit down with mum Ellie and stay with her all day.

11am: Homicide detectives from Major Crime are sent by road from Perth to Carnarvon.

1pm: Homicide officers and search experts from emergency operations leave Perth by police airwing for Carnarvon.

3pm: The officers arrive in Carnarvon.


The key details​

Sleep suit and sleeping bag

Cleo was last seen wearing a pink and purple sleepsuit with a blue and yellow pattern.

Her red and grey sleeping bag was missing from the tent, along with Cleo.

The tent zip

Police said that the zip on the tent Cleo was sleeping in was up too high for her to have reached it herself, leading them to conclude that she had been taken by a third party in a possible abduction scenario.

A car in the area

Police are still yet to hear from the driver of a car seen leaving the campsite about two hours after Cleo was last seen in her family’s tent, at around 1.30am on the morning of October 16.

“Certainly it’s a priority for us to identify who was in that vehicle,” Rod Wilde said.

Cleo’s voice

Police confirmed Cleo had been at the campsite by listening to CCTV footage from nearby shacks at the Blowholes.

The cameras recorded her talking just after the family arrived at the campsite on the night of Friday, October 15.

This verified that Cleo had indeed been at the campsite in the first place.

Cleo’s family home

Forensics officers have visited the family’s Carnarvon home on three occasions.

Police have said Ellie and her partner Jake Gliddon are not suspects.

The home has been searched as a “routine” part of the investigation.

Fences and windows were dusted to see if there is any evidence that the home may have been “stalked” or under surveillance for some time before the family went camping.

Campsite ashes and local businesses

Ashes have been taken from burnt-out campfires near shacks at the Blowholes site on Wednesday for analysis.

Police have also gathered CCTV footage from nearby businesses including bakeries and children’s clothing stores.

They announced that their search radius for information was a 1000km radius of the Blowholes, but no further south than Lancelin.

Industrial warehouses

Police have also conducted sweeps of light industrial areas around Carnarvon, looking at sheds, warehouses, and offices.

All hands on deck

Reconnaissance spy planes have been deployed in the search for Cleo.

The federal government on Wednesday pledged that “advanced capabilities” were being used in the search.

On Thursday, sources said those technologies included a reconnaissance spy plane.

Wilde said national and international agencies were engaged in the search for Cleo, including an offer of assistance from the FBI.

Past child ‘approaches’

Detectives are in the process of reviewing past reports of approaches to children in the area where Cleo went missing.

On Friday, Rod Wilde said they were looking at reports dating back as far as 10 years ago.

“Certainly over the years, and some of that we’re talking over … a 10-year span, some of these events do occur,” he said.

“So we’re going back and checking old reports.”

Return to campsite

On Friday, police returned to the Blowholes camp to undertake further mapping of the area with drones.

Wilde joined senior investigators at the site as the search for Cleo approached the two-week mark.
 

Inside the hunt for Cleo Smith: Family friends open up about the first hours of search for four-year-old girl, the moment hope began to fade and why the parents need to be left alone​

Family friends have opened up on the first few hours of the frantic search for missing Cleo Smith and the early hopes the four-year-old was just playing hide and seek.

Close friends were among the first to join a search party just hours after Cleo had vanished from the Blowholes campground near Carnarvon, Western Australia, in the early morning of October 16.

One friend said they launched a drone to search the surrounding inhospitable terrain while others jumped on quad bikes.

The search party was weighed down by a terrible feeling of shock at the sudden disappearance but also hope that Cleo would suddenly reappear.

'And we were still in hope that she was just kind of coming out of a hiding spot,' one friend told The West Australian.

'I mean, we've got to just hope that she shows up and that she came home in the end. I mean, you can't lose hope otherwise you start to lose yourself.'


Cleo had been sleeping in a family tent with her mother Ellie, 18-month-old sister Isla and stepdad Jake Gliddon when she disappeared with her sleeping bag.

The family friend recalled a shaken and distraught Ellie trying to comfort Isla while the family joined the search.

Cleo's uncle was also among the search party who arrived at the campground around the same time as the family friend.

They claimed the uncle frantically overtook them while driving on the road in order to reach the campground and begin searching as soon as possible.

'So he overtook me when we got on the bitumen,' they said.

'I don't think anyone gave a f*** if they got caught by police. There's a bigger fish to fry than giving everyone a fine that's trying to find Cleo.'

The family friend said hope of finding the little girl was slowly beginning to fade before it was replaced by a much more sinister fear.


Police now believe that Cleo had been abducted from the family tent she was sleeping in on the night she vanished.

The friend claimed they had early suspicions as it was unlikely a four-year-old girl would be able to walk very far on her own through the surrounding rugged terrain.

They also hit back at trolls who have pointed the finger at the family for the sudden disappearance - even though police have ruled out the mother and stepfather as suspects.

'How many times have the police and media said that the parents aren't suspects? Countless times, but people still don't believe them,' they said.

'Ellie and Jake would do anything for anyone. They love, as parents do, their kids.'

Police have revealed they were on the scene less than an hour after Cleo Smith's mother woke up and found her four-year-old missing.

On Friday morning local time (2pm AEST), Detective Superintendent Rob Wilde revealed Ellie first called 000 at 6.23am - despite initial reports she searched the campground for hours before police arrived.

'Police arrived at 7.10am and by 7.26am set up a protected site,' he revealed.

Inspector Jon Munday initially told the public police arrived 'about mid-morning' at the scene, but this was proven incorrect on Friday.

By 11am, homicide detectives had been sent to the area and police were already searching cars in and out of the campsite.

'Those police did a really good and thorough job,' Mr Wilde said.

Police were unable to check inside many of the shacks immediately because most were bolted shut with padlocks.

Mr Wilde also explained away the lapse in time before detectives searched the family home in Carnarvon, citing the need for 'priorities' in a case as far reaching as Cleo's.

'Our priority was at Blowholes and in the tent,' he said. 'We knew from what Ellie and Jake had told us that she went missing from the campsite', so the home was not considered a priority.

It comes after it was revealed detectives in the 100-strong taskforce had responded to 200 potential sightings of Cleo in the two weeks since she disappeared.

'Unfortunately all of those have proved unfruitful,' Mr Wilde said.

'That's been national as well, other policing jurisdictions have helped us and followed those leads through for us, so we're very grateful for that.'

They're still desperately trying to find Cleo's sleeping bag.

While none of the leads have been accurate yet, he is still calling on the public to continue searching for Cleo and reporting any potentially useful information.



About 6am: Ellie Smith wakes up and realises Cleo and her sleeping bag are missing.

6.23am — Ellie calls 000 to report her eldest daughter missing as she continues to search the camp ground.
 

Investigator blasts 'disgusting' theory about Cleo Smith's disappearance​

The police officer leading the investigation into Cleo Smith has blasted the "disgusting" trolls who have been hounding the missing 4-year-old's parents since her disappearance.

Western Australia Police previously announced that mum Ellie Smith and stepdad Jake Gliddon had been ruled out as suspects in the investigation, yet the couple has still been the subject of horrific accusations and theories online.

Homicide Detective Superintendent Rod Wilde condemned the online attacks on Saturday, confirming once again that Ms Smith and Mr Gliddon were not suspects.

"They have been copping some very disgusting behaviour online and comments and everything else like that," Perth Now reported him saying.

"We want to make it clear — they are not suspects in this investigation. They have been helping us."

"The parents have been nothing but helpful. We've worked very closely with them; they've let us into their home, they've let us into their cars, their phones – everything.

"Our job is to eliminate everyone that was at that campsite, and that is a systematic and thorough approach in doing so in any investigation. That really is the focus of the investigation at the moment."
 

The crucial CCTV that could solve Cleo Smith's disappearance: Shack owner who captured missing four-year-old girl's final movements before she mysteriously vanished breaks his silence​

The owner of a shack which captured the voice of missing Cleo Smith on its CCTV system has opened up about the 'panicked' moments after the little girl vanished.

The shack's owner, Dave Sadecky, handed over the crucial CCTV of little Cleo to police which placed her at the campsite on the night before she vanished.

The motion sensitive camera is installed inside their beach shack which was just 20 metres away from the family tent and takes a wide-angled photo of everyone who enters or leaves it.

The camera captures audio and images from inside a painted wooden box with a glass front and would not appear obvious to those passing by.

When Mr Sadecky and his wife learnt of the news surrounding the four-year-old, they immediately jumped on their quad bikes to join the search.

'I didn't know the ins and outs of what was going on but everyone was panicked,' Mr Sadecky told The West Australian.

'People dropped everything and came to help … they were everywhere on Saturday like ants — it's not a normal sight.'

The couple ended up scouring the area for 10 hours on the day Cleo was last seen.


Meanwhile, a close family friend of Cleo's mother Ellie Smith and stepdad Jake Gliddon said detectives are not wanting to give them any 'false hope'.

'There's nothing worse than saying, ''We're going to find her'', or, ''We think we've got the person'', and then they don't have the person or they don't find her,' the friend told the West.

'Police aren't going to give you false hope and that's what we said from day one.'
 
I haven't seen anyone too bad out there but I am sure on some SM or sites maybe it is or even in Australia more so but I don't follow much of anything like that. I do see people with some doubt, I still have doubt but no one that is overly attacking the parents although there are some that are pretty solid on not believing them or the story.

The Behavior Panel helped me a lot in they found the parents truthful but I find I still have trouble with the story, what happened, a real lack of details and just the odds of a bold abduction like this.

EVEN SO though, that is normal for me and in no way do I think one way or the other with any certainty. I am sure not going to attack the parents because they very well may be seriously innocent grieving parents. This could be one of the rare opportunistic bold stranger abductions.

More details I think would help, details that wouldn't hurt the investigation. The parents are forthcoming with very little, they offer nothing extra at all and perhaps that is what they have been advised to do.

Like did they eat with Cleo or just feed her and her alone? Outside the tent or inside did she/they eat? Did they cook or was it a sandwich and what was that time frame? How long was she awake when she awoke for water? Did she get up at all, etc.? Was she in PJs when you arrived or when did her PJs get put on? Who helped her do that? She was only up 1.5 hours after they got there and in bed pretty early, did she fall asleep outside in a chair or in the tent or did they put her down to sleep and did she go right to sleep or did they read her a story? I assume they took her potty before bed. You get my drift. Etc., etc. They may seem like minor things but if others are like me, it is the lack of these things that make the story maybe not ring true to me or something...

If you told me you went to the bank and home today, well okay, no reason to doubt you I guess. But if you described your trip more like the emu does with some details, well, clearly he not only did the things he said most likely but he also forgot his wallet, had to run back home, then figured he might as well stop at Wegman's where he couldn't find mushroom soup, and then he witnessed an accident on he way back home, etc.

I guess that's a part of it for me, the story is so bare bones with little detail. They advise if you are going to lie to offer no more than you have to as it is when you add too much detail or embellish that you get caught in those lies... So I see the bare bone answers in interviews and it doesn't sit quite right with me. If you are telling the truth, then you have no reason to worry about offering all details. I think that's truly what bothers me. The Behavior Panel though did help to explain some of that....

These parents are likely in the worst situation of their life and grief stricken and my heart goes out to them and I am sick over this little girl missing. No one needs to attack them as there just isn't anything there to be sure of anything. I think they are likely innocent but I am not 100 percent but that's okay. We are not the judge and jury, it's just opinion based on few facts.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,273
Messages
297,467
Members
1,102
Latest member
TYK
Back
Top Bottom