KIMBERLY HYDE: Utah woman murdered in October 2024 - Man charged claims setup (1 Viewer)

This is fairly long, about an hour. I saw it come up yesterday but wasn't compelled to watch it. Now today, it started for me somehow by me not starting it. So I stopped it but was on the page and started to skim the chat, just to see if worth a watch, etc. The chat is FULL of people saying police have the wrong guy and that her husband framed this guy. That the police department is corrupt and inept, etc. TONS of people saying such. Well, now I have to watch it to see what I think of him. This guy fled the country but saw an interview with Nate by two people who knew Kimberly, I think relatives, and wanted to give his side to Nate...

Not sure what I think yet, I haven't watched it, just starting to. Seems to be another LDS case... I do think I watched the family members on with Nate but it was a time ago. @Kimster Have you watched this? I know you watch most of Nate's too so just asking...?

 

[Tresir]

This is odd to me. I thuoght first of all that he said they were unknown calls but I do recall Jaz Utah being mentioned so maybe he meant he didn't know who was calling?

My phone doesn't look like this, did he generate a report on a computer or something of his account?

Also he finally picked up and talked to Mike, isn't that what he said and at that point he knew the person calling on the unknown number was Mike so where are the received calls? These are all missed calls. My phone also doesn't say missed "audio" calls, it says missed calls so that's also odd to me. Maybe he had an Ipad or something, I'm not familiar with them, I use Android. Also IF he doesn't have her as a contact in his phone, her name will NOT show up.

I had a call like that this morning, only the numbe showed as the name and number were not in my phone. I only answered because the timing was right for it to be my driver.

It's just odd to me. Does that post have Henry's narrative he prepared in it? I was going to look to see if Nate linked it after his video but I forgot. Otherwise, maybe I will go look for it so we can refer to it on here if I can figure out how to link it or copy it.

He said he didn't answer the first few times but then he did and it was Michael. I copied that from my post # 8 that is upthread. Check that post to see if it answers your questions. These missed calls were when he was driving I think. He screenshot them when his son picked him up. It is an app called Messenger that Mike called on. I am not familiar with that app. Mike later deleted them and this screenshot was all Henry was left with, as i understand it.

 

[GrandmaBear]

Okay I'm rereading the EIN article above. So they then tried FB messenger... so is this Messenger or his phone?? The screenshot? I'll keep reading...

 

[GrandmaBear]

Okay, imo this is getting worse for him. He first was given the garage code but then later he had a way into the house to get the key to the car? So he was in the house. And why do you have to open a back gate for someone to pick up a gas stove? Is the stove really sitting in the yard in October in Utah?

Going to keep reading. There were a few times in the interview I couldn't understand Henry and I want to see anything I might have missed.

 

[GrandmaBear]

IF Kimberly was already in the back seat, that means Henry's wife was already home too. Why would he not know this when allegedly asked to go pick them up? How could Mike know he didn't know this if he has a reason for that? You can't frame a guy telling him to go pick up your wife and his wife if his wife is already home and he knows it right? Because he'd know the two women don't need to be picked up at all.

Imo he just makes it worse for himself and my reread of it is my seeing things I couldn't understand him saying and refreshing other things I thought as well once I had time afterwards to think on it.

 

[Tresir]

Okay I'm rereading the EIN article above. So they then tried FB messenger... so is this Messenger or his phone?? The screenshot? I'll keep reading...

I don't know. You can read the full article upthread. It was obviously the other woman's app (Julia) that hub was using.

 

[Tresir]

Okay, imo this is getting worse for him. He first was given the garage code but then later he had a way into the house to get the key to the car? So he was in the house. And why do you have to open a back gate for someone to pick up a gas stove? Is the stove really sitting in the yard in October in Utah?

Going to keep reading. There were a few times in the interview I couldn't understand Henry and I want to see anything I might have missed.

The gas stove could be a garden BBQ stove or a kitchen stove that had been removed/replaced from the house and been put in the back garden for pick up.

The car key would have been in/with the car in the garage so he would only have needed to go in the garage. I don't know if there is access internally from garage to house as well. I don't remember that mentioned although he does mention remembering a retirement gift and going back to his own house to get it and leave it for Mike. But he could have left that in the garage, i guess.

Anyway, that's me done for the day. Back tomorrow .

 

[Tresir]

IF Kimberly was already in the back seat, that means Henry's wife was already home too. Why would he not know this when allegedly asked to go pick them up? How could Mike know he didn't know this if he has a reason for that? You can't frame a guy telling him to go pick up your wife and his wife if his wife is already home and he knows it right? Because he'd know the two women don't need to be picked up at all.

Imo he just makes it worse for himself and my reread of it is my seeing things I couldn't understand him saying and refreshing other things I thought as well once I had time afterwards to think on it.

I think they must have returned when he was at the gym. Did the two women go in Henri's/Henri's wife's car or in Kim's car? We don't know. He walked to the gym perhaps because his wife had their car and they returned when he was at the gym. Who knows?

Have to go.

 

[GrandmaBear]

He went back to the Hyde’s house, grabbed the car key from inside the home and got into Kimberly’s car. He recalls the windows being tinted and “a lot of things” piled in the back seat.

As he started driving to the park, Resuera says Michael called again.

“He informed me that they were already picked up and were going to Ashley Hospital (Ashley Regional Women’s Health) in Vernal. He told me to go there,” Resuera says.

This makes no sense either. Why would Mike want Henry in the car but then claim they were at the hospital. The hospital for what exactly? If Mike killed Kim then he knows Henry is in the car with Kim's body. Why not just leave it like that? He has what he wants, Henry driving the car with Kim's body in it, framing him.

Makes no sense. At best he is leaving a lot out of some of these things but to me it's just more proof he is lying.

I also didn't catch the part about tape over Kim's mouth or forgot....

Again, the only way it works is if it is Henry or Henry and Mike. Early on I thought maybe they hoped with charging one, they'd get him to flip on the other. Imo that is still possible but that they KNOW Henry was involved but need more on the hub.

I do agree Mike has the more obvious possible motive but that works just as well if Henry was in on it too. Henry's motive therefore would be money.

 

[GrandmaBear]

The gas stove could be a garden BBQ stove or a kitchen stove that had been removed/replaced from the house and been put in the back garden for pick up.

The car key would have been in/with the car in the garage so he would only have needed to go in the garage. I don't know if there is access internally from garage to house as well. I don't remember that mentioned although he does mention remembering a retirement gift and going back to his own house to get it and leave it for Mike. But he could have left that in the garage, i guess.

Anyway, that's me done for the day. Back tomorrow .

No it says he said he went INSIDE the house and grabbed the key. There are so many holes in his story or lack of explaining how some of it even makes sense. It doesn't make sense because he is making up things to fit facts. Imo.

 

[GrandmaBear]

I think they must have returned when he was at the gym. Did the two women go in Henri's/Henri's wife's car or in Kim's car? We don't know. He walked to the gym perhaps because his wife had their car and they returned when he was at the gym. Who knows?

Have to go.

Yeah, that sure works out just perfect, that's what I mean. Too perfect. That he had know way of knowing either woman was home. Uh-huh. I'm not buyung it.

You don't seem to consider these men could have been in this together. Why not? That I could get behind as it is that ore Henry did it alone.

 

[Regina]

True. The only other way would be if he restrained her in the home in any way but that seems doubtful. They probably do put her as alive in the car then and must know the time of death or approximately then.

I seem to recall that she was tied and blindfolded. Was it Henry who said that?

 

[Tresir]

Yeah, that sure works out just perfect, that's what I mean. Too perfect. That he had know way of knowing either woman was home. Uh-huh. I'm not buyung it.

You don't seem to consider these men could have been in this together. Why not? That I could get behind as it is that ore Henry did it alone.

Yes I do consider that. I don't believe only Henry killed her though as he has no motive.

 

[Tresir]

IF Kimberly was already in the back seat, that means Henry's wife was already home too. Why would he not know this when allegedly asked to go pick them up? How could Mike know he didn't know this if he has a reason for that? You can't frame a guy telling him to go pick up your wife and his wife if his wife is already home and he knows it right? Because he'd know the two women don't need to be picked up at all.

Imo he just makes it worse for himself and my reread of it is my seeing things I couldn't understand him saying and refreshing other things I thought as well once I had time afterwards to think on it.

If Henry killed her then when hub asked him to pick them up using Kim's car, why didn't Henry think 'oh shoot i can't use her car because i just killed Kim and shoved her in the back seat.'

Her car was a Civic I believe. They are not very big cars if they are similar to Civics in the UK.

 

[Tresir]

I am bringing forward the link to Henry's full statement from post #8. He says what I said ie why would he drive Kim's car knowing her body was in it?

READ HENRY RESUERA’S COMPLETE STATEMENT ON HIS VERSION OF EVENTS HERE
READ HENRY RESUERA’S COMPLETE MESSAGE MICHAEL HYDE, KIMBERLY HYDE’S FAMILY, VERNAL POLICE, AND PRES. DONALD TRUMP HERE

 

[GrandmaBear]

I seem to recall that she was tied and blindfolded. Was it Henry who said that?

He said she had tape over her mouth and there was blood all over--in the car. I wondered too on the tied. Could it have been said in the charging document?

IF she was tied and they thought she was when still in the home, that too would constitute kidnapping generally, as it would be preventing a person from leaving, detaining, etc.

 

[GrandmaBear]

Yes I do consider that. I don't believe only Henry killed her though as he has no motive.

You've made it clear about the motive, yes. I do get that, he doesn't have an apparent one but if he did it with the hub, he does have a motive and it most likely would be money. For me, I'm not eliminating him though from having done it alone either because just because we don't see his motive, it doesn't mean he didn't have one. There is no eliminating him for me, he was the only one there and cameras would seem to indicate that, as well as an alibi for Mike. Added to that is his story for me is mostly unbelievable.

 

[GrandmaBear]

If Henry killed her then when hub asked him to pick them up using Kim's car, why didn't Henry think 'oh shoot i can't use her car because i just killed Kim and shoved her in the back seat.'

Her car was a Civic I believe. They are not very big cars if they are similar to Civics in the UK.

You're assuming the husband really did ask him to pick them up, I assume that's a lie.

If the car was a Civic, and that sounds right but I didn't recall the car but now that you mention it, it rings a bell, that makes it even more unlikely Henry didn't see the body (assuming his version is true, which I don't assume). It was made quite clear that LE on approaching the car could see her easily. Why didn't Henry?

Because, imo, he is the one who put her in there and it's a lie.

 

[Tresir]

No it says he said he went INSIDE the house and grabbed the key. There are so many holes in his story or lack of explaining how some of it even makes sense. It doesn't make sense because he is making up things to fit facts. Imo.

He says he got the car from inside the house , yes but he only mentions he had the garage code so maybe there's an internal door into the house from the garage. I also noticed on reading it again today that hub told him to leave the back door open in case they ( those picking up the stove ) wanted a drink or to use the facilities. Henry also left a retirement gift in the property that they had forgotten to take with them the evening before. So how he could do that at the same time as killing Kim just doesn't seem possible to me.

 

[Tresir]

You're assuming the husband really did ask him to pick them up, I assume that's a lie.

If the car was a Civic, and that sounds right but I didn't recall the car but now that you mention it, it rings a bell, that makes it even more unlikely Henry didn't see the body (assuming his version is true, which I don't assume). It was made quite clear that LE on approaching the car could see her easily. Why didn't Henry?

Because, imo, he is the one who put her in there and it's a lie.

Why was hub calling him so many times then? The stove story and the screen shot was made up too?

Explain why Henry took the car if he knew Kim was in it?

 

[Tresir]

You've made it clear about the motive, yes. I do get that, he doesn't have an apparent one but if he did it with the hub, he does have a motive and it most likely would be money. For me, I'm not eliminating him though from having done it alone either because just because we don't see his motive, it doesn't mean he didn't have one. There is no eliminating him for me, he was the only one there and cameras would seem to indicate that, as well as an alibi for Mike. Added to that is his story for me is mostly unbelievable.

If his motive was money, why refuse the flight money? That doesn't make sense.