• It's FREE to join our group and ALL MEMBERS ARE AD-FREE!

DAN MARKEL: Florida v Magbanua, Garcia, & Adelson in murder-for-hire *Magbanua & Adelson GUILTY* *DONNA GUILTY* (4 Viewers)

220px-Dan_Markel.jpg


Leon Circuit Judge James C. Hankinson set an April 13 trial date for Katherine Magbanua, whose charges in the murder of Florida State law professor Dan Markel ended in mistrial earlier this month.

Magbanua, wearing a blue Leon County Detention Center jumpsuit, appeared in the courtroom with her attorneys, Chris DeCoste and Tara Kawass. Hankinson asked about her legal representation moving forward; DeCoste said he and Kawass intend to continue defending her.

 
Just three hours.

I gather victim impact statements were already given, that surprises me at this time of day. Sentencing will be at a later date.

I also gather Donna sobbed.

Dan's dad asked her if it was all worth it.
 
I wonder how soon the grand jury can meet to start the process for Wendi. I'm sure Georgia has everything ready to go for the Grand Jury.
Consensus is that Wendi will be next. Most think as soon as a bit comes off of Georgia's plate but not long. It is also said there already may be a sealed indictment but even though possible, most don't think that's the case. It also depends on when the grand jury sits in that county. Most I am hearing though are positive she is going to be charged. I feel the same. There was a point in this trial so much was coming out about Wendi it seemed like State vs. Wendi rather than Donna...
 
Yeah Georgia (prosecutor) is something else. If she can't win the case for you, no one can.

There were times during trial I didn't think she was quite on her game as in some but mostly she was. Her closing was beyond outstanding. I did think part II could have been shorter but no matter.

This win was big. Most of us think Donna was the ringleader. Been a long time coming.
 

Donna is done: But is justice done with the Adelson family in Dan Markel murder? | Analysis​

Eleven years after the heinous murder of Florida State University Professor Dan Markel, we've seen five individuals convicted and held responsible for the unthinkable crime.

The question left unanswered is whether the wheels of justice have completed their journey or will the train collect more individuals many believe are in the crosshairs?
 
I think Wendi will definitely be charged as to most I've listened to.

If one watched the trial, there was a point it almost seemed Wendi was being prosecuted instead of Donna. So much came up about her for some days, rather than about Donna. Of course they were going to tie them all together though. Yeah, she'll be next imo. A couple of months maybe. Time for Georgia's schedule and load to clear some and the Grand Jury to convene and have the case presented.
 

BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: Juror in Donna Adelson trial reveals how they arrived at guilty verdict​

Juror number 6 is sharing the deliberation process that led to the conviction of Donna Adelson for 3 charges, including first-degree murder.


One of those jurors, juror number 6, Evan Higginbotham, played a key role in those deliberations, where he said jurors methodically went through each count to decide on the verdict.

"Going in, I was leaning towards guilty after seeing all the evidence laid out," said Higginbotham. "For count one, we spent probably the first hour, 45 minutes, or two hours of our three and some change that we were in there. Just talking about the first count and laying out all the evidence and digging through everything that we wanted to go back and look at again."

Higginbotham said the reason for that guilty verdict: the evidence, pointing to Rob Adelson's testimony, phone records, and the "bump" operation where an undercover agent blackmailed Donna to see what she knew about the murder.

"When the operation happened and she was handed that sheet of paper," said Higginbotham. "Just taking the paper and putting it straight into her bag without looking at it. I'm not taking anything from anyone and putting it in my bag before looking at it."

Did you have discussion about any other suspects in that room?

"Not really," said Higginbotham. "We briefly spoke about Wendi Adelson, but she's not the one on trial, so we tried to stay focused and follow the jury instructions and stay only discussing Donna's part in this. We spoke about Charlie in some points, but him being convicted has nothing to do with whether she was involved or not."

Donna Adelson is the 5th person to be convicted for the murder of Markel. There has been lots of speculation on whether Donna's daughter and Dan Markel's ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, could be arrested next.

ABC 27 spoke with State Attorney Jack Campbell to see where prosecutors stand with the investigation.

"We will continue to work and make sure that every person who is responsible, we can hold them accountable," said Campbell. "Now, I can't predict where that will lead us right now, but I can guarantee you that we're not stopping looking at the evidence."

Higginbotham, who is 24 and in school, said because of this experience, he has changed his career path.

"I actually went and changed my major. I've been talking about this now.(9:58) I'm now going for a pre-law degree from engineering," said Higginbotham.

Next steps in the Donna Adelson case include her sentencing, that has not happened yet. When the verdict was announced Thursday, Dan Markel's parents requested the maximum sentence from Judge Stephen Everett. A case management has been set for October 14th.
 
Three jurors at least have spoken out. I only saw two o f those three so far.

The ones I did hear left me feeling they were a very responsible jury who took their duty solemnly.
 

Court denies Adelson's motion for a new trial​

Another defeat for the Donna Adelson legal team.
A request for a new trial has been denied.
  • The court denied the digital motion filed by Donna Adelson.
  • Key evidence was deemed insufficient to support the digital claims.
Adelson also requested new trial due to the following:
  • The verdict is contrary to law or weight of the evidence
  • The court erred in a decision of any matter of law which arose during the trial
  • For other cause not due to Mrs. Adelson's fault, she didn't receive a fair and impartial trial.
CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL STORY

TO READ THE FULL MOTION, CLICK HERE
 
— SENTENCE IMPOSED
⬛ On Count 1 (First-Degree Murder): Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
⬛ On Count 2 (Conspiracy to Commit Murder): 30 years, consecutive to Count 1.
⬛ On Count 3 (Solicitation to Commit Murder): 30 years, concurrent with Count 2 but consecutive to Count 1.
 
— SENTENCE IMPOSED
⬛ On Count 1 (First-Degree Murder): Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
⬛ On Count 2 (Conspiracy to Commit Murder): 30 years, consecutive to Count 1.
⬛ On Count 3 (Solicitation to Commit Murder): 30 years, concurrent with Count 2 but consecutive to Count 1.
Bawhaha! CONSECUTIVE! Technically still be in prison 30 years after death!
 
the defense fought against that. Hoping that if count 1 was thrown out during an appeal, a concurrent sentence on count 2 would allow Donna to walk, Thankful that the Judge didn't choose that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Forum statistics

    Threads
    3,175
    Messages
    271,721
    Members
    1,058
    Latest member
    Friendofafriend
    Back
    Top Bottom