Ok then don't explain it. But there is no point posting pics with no explanation IMO and then when it is questioned saying it should be obvious. I am not going to guess what someone is supposedly trying to point out.If I explain it, you'll just find some reason to discount it. If you can't see it, nothing I can say will help you.
Ok thanks. Its bound to make more sense than anything i have read today.@Tresir Tom did one on this just recently. He's a bit late to the game but has followed somewhat and he is such an analyzer, fact person, spreadsheet person lol, ett. and so unbiased and I haven't watched it all yet either but the first how many minutes is already interesting. Try to remember to link if I get around to. I already know who maybe will watch and who won't.
Imo news and shows have a lot to do with this. All some do or watch are shows and news like that want the hype and splashy headlines, clickbait, etc. They don't truly evaluate. I have one in my family and boy can one tell with anything, any subject,. Nowadays there is SO much more and some that really look at things even if it goes against a crowd or their own fans.
Anyhow just letting you know, a first one of Tom's is out. Perhaps the most unbiased person (know of a few) I have ever watched.
Yeah telling you to drop it imo was not right when no one else is. Have you reported and pointed out the thread title?
I'm pretty sure who watched the trial here or major parts of it and who did not.
I want to to be done with it but I don't like falsehoods or someone telling another to drop it. @Cousin Dupree no offense but that's something coming from you. We listened to the same thing a million time over from you in the Delphi case. Stuck on the same thing on repeat. I am not trying to start something, just saying that it wasn't very nice to say that and no one here makes you right either.
This jury seems to have hangups on the investigation, not the crazy other stuff or conspiracy theory, just don't seem to believe it was proven.
And she was NOT FOUND INNOCENT on all counts.
There are plenty here on BOTH sides. We watched, we saw, I think some a LOT more than others. And I for one don't need one side trying to be stuffed at me STILL even after verdict when we all followed. Well some, to a point.
I don't know what it is about this case with people. Truly. Unless some just want or need some mayhem in their lives and an excuse.
I jump out and have many times but have followed elsewhere. Not going to not say so though when it continues.
I was ready for a verdict either direction. I felt the P solidly did a far superior job. However, I also knew the crowd thing and media saturation. She will get her own one day I also figured.
She also is going to own people like Turtleboy and good luck to her on that one.
There are four here, I believe sometimes five who see her guilt so how is it you think you can tell people they are wrong if they don't agree with you?
Asking nicely, you know next that I will joke with you in the basement, etc. No idea why the nastiness needs to go on. With one I am not surprised.
And the title of this thread IS wrong.
Ok then don't explain it. But there is no point posting pics with no explanation IMO and then when it is questioned saying it should be obvious. I am not going to guess what someone is supposedly trying to point out.
![]()
![]()
Ok thanks. Its bound to make more sense than anything i have read today.
ETA found it and have started watching. He is hitting all the evidence that points to the car and he did not go in house. Here's the link.
I know and i asked her a question she ignored but you answered. Which is why i responded to you.@Guess Who posted that.
Not to you maybe but several of us are interested in what he thinks.Yeah, whatever he thinks now doesn't matter.
Not to you maybe but several of us are interested in what he thinks.
What makes you think they won't be charging anyone else? Somebody killed JO.
Well thats all still TBD isn't it? They can't let the murder of a cop go unresolved. They need to reinvestigate.Not the person you think. The person or person's responsible are, IMO, cops and the cover up will never come to light because of it.
Unfortunately, those people have lied to the O'Keefe family and have them believing the story about Karen are true. Which was easy to do, because she's not easy to like.
Her supporters haven't helped either. She should have lashed out at them the first time they harrassed the O'Keefe family.
All of the pieces in evidence were found on FairviewYes but after that she drove it to her parents, where LE recovered it from, so more could have fallen out at her parents too and been collected by LE. No way of knowing. I don't think all the pieces were found were they, unless you have a link explaining it? She drove back to JO's, then to her friend's then back to JO''s, then to her parents, where the vehicle was recovered by LE to the sallyport. So i don't follow your point at all.
8 Minutes.
To me, the two photos show the same thing.It should be obvious.
Tresir, in case you don't know, I want to clarify why I said " before showing up at Jennifer's" and elaborate.All of the pieces in evidence were found on Fairview
.
Re her route, it's called into question as to whether she went back to Fairview that morn. before showing up at Jennifer's because there's over 20 minutes missing from the time she left John's and arrived at Jennifer's.
Ok thanks. Its bound to make more sense than anything i have read today.
ETA found it and have started watching. He is hitting all the evidence that points to the car and he did not go in house. Here's the link.
Still the remark was not very nice. And interesting how some were not around or had much for comments until the verdict. Almost voiceless.Sorry, but I'm not the only one who won't let it go.
Oh you have watched so many dissected cases after the fact, that's almost funny lol. Wrongfully convicted always are.Yeah, whatever he thinks now doesn't matter.
You are still on the huge crazy conspiracy thing? Neither juror even was sold on that. Out of here for a bit. I can take it for a bit then I'm sick of it.Not the person you think. The person or person's responsible are, IMO, cops and the cover up will never come to light because of it.
Unfortunately, those people have lied to the O'Keefe family and have them believing the story about Karen are true. Which was easy to do, because she's not easy to like.
Her supporters haven't helped either. She should have lashed out at them the first time they harrassed the O'Keefe family.
That would explain how she knew where he was on the lawn.All of the pieces in evidence were found on Fairview
.
Re her route, it's called into question as to whether she went back to Fairview that morn. before showing up at Jennifer's because there's over 20 minutes missing from the time she left John's and arrived at Jennifer's.
I must have missed that. How do they know that? Was there data missing from something??All of the pieces in evidence were found on Fairview
.
Re her route, it's called into question as to whether she went back to Fairview that morn. before showing up at Jennifer's because there's over 20 minutes missing from the time she left John's and arrived at Jennifer's.
This was GOOD Regina! Short but to the point! Too bad not all will likely watch it.I feel so sorry for all those people. All they're guilty of is hospitality.
In his opening, Brennan was referring to John and his neice and nephew but what he said applies to so many other people, too. He said "they led a good life...enter Karen Read".