Canada LILY & JACK SULLIVAN: Missing from Pictou County, Nova Scotia - 2 May 2025 - Ages 6 & 4 (1 Viewer)

sullivan.jpg

Lily Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, were reported missing around 10 a.m. Friday. They were last seen on Gairloch Road in Lansdowne Station.

Police believe the siblings wandered away from their home and say there is no information to suggest they were abducted.
<snip>
Martell says he and Malehya Brooks-Murray asked Lily and Jack to quiet down on Friday morning to let the baby sleep.

He estimates it took up to 20 minutes to notice the two children were gone.

“A few minutes went by, I heard nothing. Got up, went out in the kitchen, checked everything, I seen they weren’t there. Checked their bedrooms and they weren’t there. So I looked out the backyard, that’s the only other place they would go, and their boots were gone. The door, the sliding door, was closed. Usually they don’t close the door, I usually have to remind them, remind them to close the door over and over,” he says.

Martell says he then jumped in his vehicle and started looking for them.


media link: LILY & JACK SULLIVAN wandered off from their Pictou County, NOVA SCOTIA home on May 2, 2025 and are still MISSING!
 
Last edited:

N.S. missing kids: Province offers $150K reward in search for Lilly and Jack​

Nova Scotia is offering a reward of up to $150,000 for information in the disappearance of two young children who were last seen more than a month and a half ago.

Their disappearance has been added to the province’s Major Unsolved Crimes Program, which the province says is a “tool to help police in major unsolved crime cases.”

In a Thursday news release, Becky Druhan, Attorney General and Minister of Justice, said, “The disappearance of Jack and Lilly Sullivan is felt across the province and beyond, and my heart goes out to the family, the community and everyone who has been working to find these children since Day 1.

“Police and investigators are working tirelessly to find answers, and I urge anyone with information to please share this with the RCMP as soon as possible.”

The amount rewarded under the program will be based on the “investigative value” of the information.

Those with information can call the Rewards for Major Unsolved Crimes Program at 1-888-710-9090.

“People who come forward with information must provide their name and contact information and may be called to testify in court. All calls will be recorded,” the province said in the release.

Information can also be shared anonymously through Crime Stoppers of Nova Scotia at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477).
 
In a few newer cases lately they keep upping rewards. I've RARELY seen such work, not even sure if I have honestly. For one thing, for anyone to know as much as required for the reward, they were probably involved. For another sometimes they aren't given for various reasons so I think most don't trust them in that respet. Here they have to give name, be willing to testify and more.

Imo, it is a feel good way to look as if something is going on and rarely given out or works anyhow.

Jmo too but I'm hard put to even think of a case such worked and man I have followed tons.

I can think of one where a woman clearly deserved it but the public started sayng it should go to the victim. So the public didn't even endorse her having it or those that helped. She did not need it I don't think so made no big deal of it but they just don't work. That case was not solved because of any reward and it sure was not solved by LE either.

I have wanted to say that in a few cases lately where it is what maybe lawmakers or others do for some look as if they are behind it and backing it, but never ever have I seen them make much difference.

Again jmo.
 

Polygraphs, a blanket and a bootprint: New details of investigation into missing N.S. children revealed​

Nearly a dozen RCMP units are trying to piece together what happened to Lilly and Jack Sullivan.

Did you kill Lilly and Jack?

That was the first question Daniel Martell says he was asked during a polygraph test in the case of two missing Nova Scotia children.

I was extremely nervous, said Martell, the stepfather of Lilly and Jack Sullivan, who vanished nearly seven weeks ago.

It's like your stress level is just astronomically through the roof and your body doesn't know what to do because it's not every day the way you're hooked up to machines in an interrogation room where someone asks you questions like that.


Six weeks after two children went missing in Nova Scotia, Lilly and Jack Sullivan's stepfather says he passed a police polygraph related to their disappearance. He spoke with the CBC's Kayla Hounsell.

Martell had offered to take a polygraph test early in the investigation, realizing investigators were likely looking his way in the mysterious disappearance of Lilly, 6, and Jack, 4.

Martell said he's gone above and beyond to help police with the investigation, encouraging them to search his family's property, offering up his cellphone and banking information and asking for a polygraph test.

The stepfather is always a prime suspect right off the beginning, said Martell in a recent interview.

About three weeks ago, he sat in a large chair and had sensory pads placed under his forearms, buttocks and feet as part of a polygraph test.

He said all the questions were presumptive that the children are no longer alive, such as: Are you an accessory to the murder of Lilly and Jack?

None of the questions assumed the children were taken, he said.

In Canada, polygraph tests are used as an investigative tool and are not admissible in court.

Martell was informed of his results immediately after. He said the investigator told him: You did a good job. You passed.

The stepfather is one of 54 people who have been formally interviewed as part of the investigation. Some have received polygraph tests, although RCMP will not confirm how many.


On the first day of the search, emergency responders speaking over a non-encrypted radio channel mention a canine unit being dispatched to a blanket.

Families brought us to a location there not far away that there's a piece of a blanket which the mother says she believes belongs to her daughter, just off the road here, an official said over the radio.

Martell confirmed it was a piece of Lilly's blanket.

There is more evidence than what the public knows, but I can't elaborate on any of that, said Martell.

He did say it was found on Lansdowne Road near the location of a child-sized bootprint that was discovered around the same time by searchers in the area of a pipeline trail, just over a kilometre from the children's home.

RCMP refused to answer questions about the blanket, however the force did confirm the bootprint was believed to be child-sized.


Tremblay said they have received more than 500 tips from the public.

Whether it's a tip that indicates that there could be something that happened elsewhere in the province, elsewhere in the country, we have to follow up on those investigative tips to rule them out. And to this date we haven't had any confirmed sightings, he said.
 
Very much on a wait and see here. Despite all that, not necessarily buying into all. Who last ever saw the blanket for instance? Maybe mom is more suss than him hard to say but he claims to have done a polygraph, etc. while she claimvs to have been advised to not share much. He goes on about helping and voluntarily taking a pollgraph, she has never said such. We know his mom and a bf we know little of were on the property.

Or how helpful they have been.

LE won't say how many have been polygraphed. And so on.

Nothing we hear really tells us anything.

Why aren't mom and him together?

Very much I think another wait and see.
 

Missing Nova Scotia children were assessed by child welfare agency months before disappearance​

Nova Scotia’s child protection agency investigated the living conditions of Jack and Lilly Sullivan months before their mysterious disappearance from a rural part of the province in early May – a case file that has been reviewed by the minister responsible for child welfare.

Scott Armstrong, Nova Scotia’s Minister of Opportunities and Social Development, confirmed in an interview that the agency had a file on the children prior to their disappearance, but said it would be inappropriate for him to discuss the agency’s findings.

With Jack and Lilly still missing and a police investigation under way, it’s not the right time to dissect the agency’s prior involvement, Mr. Armstrong said.

“We have no idea where those kids are and we should be focused on helping them and finding them and supporting this family,” he said.

Asked whether a review has been ordered into his agency’s prior interaction with the children, he said: “As minister, I’ve seen a report. I’ll talk to that. I’ve personally seen the report. I asked for it,” he said. “I’m aware of how our department was involved in this.”

He added: “I think we should be focused more on those kids than we are on looking to blame somebody.”

Mr. Armstrong said there may come a point when the agency’s involvement with the children is deserving of more scrutiny, but now – seven weeks into their disappearance – is not it.

Daniel Martell, who was in a common-law relationship with the children’s mother and was living with them when they went missing, told The Globe and Mail in an interview in May that a social worker with child protective services visited the home several months ago. The visit was prompted by concerns that had been relayed by someone at the children’s school and related to their developmental delays, Mr. Martell said.

The children’s mother, Malehya Brooks-Murray, said she had “no comment” in relation to child protective services’ involvement with Lilly and Jack.
 
Hmmm. Mom never has any comment, that's no surprise. And bf each time says perhaps too much. Getting used to that routine and it's starting to make me really wonder about mom, not that i've dismissed either. CPS can be contacted or called in for not valid reasons but it both truly had developmental delays, it can be a sign of abuse and this is times two. Or neglect and just not doing a thing with them and so on.

Then they kept them out of school on top of it that week they disappeared. The new baby is fine but they are missing.

Haven't come to a conclusion but am just talking some things known out loud.

Often anything CPS never comes out easily, at least here, kind of interesting this did and thremarksat an official spoke to it.

I thought mom was perhaps cooperating but am beginning to think she may be shielding self with every non response.

It is still a wait and see but take CPS involvement, school concern, and the hovel that place is, add in is first in this case about them and him tending to the baby, not a great picture. The baby, if it is not, should perhaps be in someone else's hands than either of them. And perhaps that is why she left, may have been told that. Still no answers at this time for us. Perhaps by staying with her family and leaving, baby could be kept.

Who knows.

I have little hope these two alive. And the picture of the parents gets worse and worse. All I really know at this point. And that they aren't together for some reason.
 

Missing Nova Scotia children were assessed by child welfare agency months before disappearance​

Nova Scotia’s child protection agency investigated the living conditions of Jack and Lilly Sullivan months before their mysterious disappearance from a rural part of the province in early May – a case file that has been reviewed by the minister responsible for child welfare.

Scott Armstrong, Nova Scotia’s Minister of Opportunities and Social Development, confirmed in an interview that the agency had a file on the children prior to their disappearance, but said it would be inappropriate for him to discuss the agency’s findings.

With Jack and Lilly still missing and a police investigation under way, it’s not the right time to dissect the agency’s prior involvement, Mr. Armstrong said.

“We have no idea where those kids are and we should be focused on helping them and finding them and supporting this family,” he said.

Asked whether a review has been ordered into his agency’s prior interaction with the children, he said: “As minister, I’ve seen a report. I’ll talk to that. I’ve personally seen the report. I asked for it,” he said. “I’m aware of how our department was involved in this.”

He added: “I think we should be focused more on those kids than we are on looking to blame somebody.”

Mr. Armstrong said there may come a point when the agency’s involvement with the children is deserving of more scrutiny, but now – seven weeks into their disappearance – is not it.

Daniel Martell, who was in a common-law relationship with the children’s mother and was living with them when they went missing, told The Globe and Mail in an interview in May that a social worker with child protective services visited the home several months ago. The visit was prompted by concerns that had been relayed by someone at the children’s school and related to their developmental delays, Mr. Martell said.

The children’s mother, Malehya Brooks-Murray, said she had “no comment” in relation to child protective services’ involvement with Lilly and Jack.
Sounds like they might have been trying to say that the developmental delays might be caused by their environment instead of possible autism OR stating that their developmental delays were not being addressed.
 
Sounds like they might have been trying to say that the developmental delays might be caused by their environment instead of possible autism OR stating that their developmental delays were not being addressed.
I think it could be school policy that autistic children's homelives are investigated by such an agency.
 
I saw they were supposedly autistic but then someone corrected me and said they were not, or not a known fact or some such.

Abuse and neglect cause developmental delays too. Majorly.
 
If they were missing school a lot too which they apparently were this week, that's another red flag imo to schools. We can't know all of course but it would seem there may be some history here of problems.

I'm a bit surprised they put that info out. Usually you can't find out sh*t about anything related to CPS involvement. Others may have known though and so they are getting ahead of it OR it is a strategy, see what the parents have to say to that one. She won't say a thing, we can about count on that one, but he tends to...
 
I still think it could be just a matter of protocol.
But it would have to be officially diagnosed first for them to do that. Also, they would need to know the extent of how much intervention they might need. Just because they are on the spectrum, that doesn't mean they need any special intervention.
 
Some kids are behind just because of poor parenting with no real interaction. I would think if the school was inquiring about their developmental delays, that "should" put the parents in notice that something needs to happen. It appears that since they are stating possible, undiagnosed autism, that these parents did nothing to inquire as to why the kids were delayed.
 
These are just some of the links that mention autism. Also a report was done on the kids a couple of months before they disappeared but the authorities won't release the contents, otherwise we could know more.



Seven weeks later, two N.S. children are still missing. Why wasn't an Amber Alert issued?

Lilly Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, possibly have autism, according to family

aly-thomson.jpg

Aly Thomson · CBC News · Posted: Jun 20, 2025 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 10 hours ago

Three posters on stands, one of a little girl, one of a map with colourful lines and another of a little boy.

RCMP set up a command station in Lansdowne Station, N.S., in the days after the children went missing. (Nicola Seguin/CBC)


Social Sharing​


  • X

  • Email

  • Reddit

Show More
Seven weeks after two children went missing from a rural Nova Scotia community, family members are still questioning why an Amber Alert wasn't issued for Lilly and Jack Sullivan.
The young siblings have been missing since the morning of May 2, when police received a 911 call reporting they had wandered away from their home in Lansdowne Station, about 140 kilometres northeast of Halifax.
RCMP have said all along that the case did not meet the criteria for the alert, and are now providing more details on the factors that are considered and the process that plays out in such situations.
Amber Alerts are a national public notification system used to help find abducted children believed to be in imminent danger.
Cpl. Guillaume Tremblay, who works in the RCMP's communications unit, was working the day of the disappearance and reviewed the policy on Amber Alerts.
He said the criteria state there must be something to point the public toward, such as a suspect, a person of interest or a vehicle.
"You want to direct the public to look for a specific vehicle, to look for that licence plate, to look for that suspicious person, to have a photo of someone or more information to suggest that there was an abduction," said Tremblay in a recent interview.
A little girl and boy are seen painting crafts at a table.

Lilly and Jack Sullivan are seen painting crafts in this family photo. (Submitted)
While Tremblay reviewed the policy, it's the risk manager — appointed for every major incident — that ultimately decides if an alert should be sent out.
In this case, the force issued two "vulnerable persons" alerts.
The first was sent at 12:43 p.m. on the day of the disappearance and was directed to cellphones across a swath of communities in northeastern parts of Nova Scotia's mainland, including Lansdowne Station and New Glasgow.
The second was issued at 5:26 p.m. the following day — May 3 — and included a larger area from Truro up to Tatamagouche and stretching across to Antigonish.
A screengrab of a text alert on a cell phone that says the RCMP are asking for the public's assistance in finding Lilly and Jack Sullivan, and a description of the children.

For Daniel Martell, the children's stepfather, those alerts did not go far enough.
He said he asked RCMP to issue an Amber Alert early on, and to position officers at the New Brunswick and P.E.I. borders and the airport, but was told the situation did not meet the criteria.
"I think they should have just bent the criteria at that moment," said Martell. "It wasn't just one missing person, but two vulnerable children."
default.jpg

'I didn't kill Lilly and Jack': Stepfather of missing N.S. kids says he passed polygraph
1 day ago

Duration10:30
Six weeks after two children went missing in Nova Scotia, Lilly and Jack Sullivan's stepfather says he passed a police polygraph related to their disappearance. He spoke with the CBC's Kayla Hounsell.
Lilly and Jack's mother, Malehya Brooks-Murray, posted on her Facebook page the day after the disappearance asking for an Amber Alert to be issued.
RCMP have repeatedly said there is no evidence to suggest the children were abducted.
But that hasn't quelled the concerns of Belynda Gray, the children's paternal grandmother.
She, too, wanted police to issue an Amber Alert, given the children's vulnerability.
Lilly and Jack's mother and stepfather have both spoken to the media about how the siblings could have autism, but it has not been diagnosed.
Gray says it's unfortunate an Amber Alert hinges on a specific car or person being identified as involved in a disappearance.
"These are vulnerable kids," Gray said in a recent interview. "They do have a bit of a learning disability, so that puts them even more vulnerable."



The children were reported missing by family members after failing to return home. They were last seen at home. According to reporting from the National Post, the children's stepfather, Daniel Robert Martell, said the two have undiagnosed autism and that they don't typically stray far from home.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,103
Messages
262,114
Members
1,034
Latest member
jarad adams
Back
Top Bottom