Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *TRIAL IN PROGRESS* (5 Viewers)

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I managed to get in and updated the post with her testimony. Very interesting. Do we have her testimony from the first trial on here too? I'll do a search and see if i can find it for comparison.
You mean the niece? Doubtful. I asked like a kazillion times about it in here and was basically ignored, I figured because her testimony did not fit the KR innocent theme. And figured at a point no one was watching the actual trial. I get that, sometimes I can't either but still I go back or see what I can. I finally went and found it for myself. Whether I linked it or not, I couldn't tell you. So I wouldn't spend a lot of time trying to find it, guarantee you no one else ever linked it.
 
She never again spoke to anyone who knew John!
She never explained to his family what happened and over the phone as she was headed out of town to her parent's house, she told John's sister-in-law that she probably wouldn't be speaking to them again and that she (Read) "would have to remember the good times".
Yeah and that behavior lends to an intentional act imo. She was already done.
 
You know what is interesting in the last two days of testimony (and others) but the last two for sure, and it gets a hit old listening, even though I stick it out as it is necessary, is the sheer number of people involved in this investigation who quit simply are not Canton PD, a buddy of Proctor's or anything like that. They are looking at the body and other things, doing their job. Don't bother with people out their who jumped on her bandwagon and can't see the other side of it seriously. I do watch somewhere that most don't try to force their opinion on one. One has to wonder why some feel the need? I think she is guilty pure and simple but I feel no need to convince anyone else where anyone supporting her seems to feel that need, well most do. Or are some just bent on being right, no idea.

She is guilty WITH facts of manslaughter and DUI. Personally I don't think they can prove intentional (although I think it was darned right intentional). I think they charged high and expected her to plead but instead she went and decided to put on this entire overblown show.

I am calling this one the sidebar trial as there are so many. And every single time she marches up there with what four or five lawyers making it look so overblown, I have to almost laugh.

It's just a typical D b.s. game. I wouldn't even bother with anyone out there though who thinks she is innocent who falls for such hook, line and sinker. Jmo.
Her using reverse for that distance and at that speed and immediately leaving and continuing to behave like a raving lunatic is what proves to me that it was intentional.

Edit: Re raving lunatic, her first voicemail to John- at 12:37:08- was "John I ******* hate you"
 
Last edited:
BTW i have found a link showing what the niece said. I will find and post but my adblocker would not let me read it. If anyone can get in, please copy pasta. Did they interview the niece and nephew in the first trial? I just got time to read that the niece said they were always arguing, then I got chucked out.

Hey bingo! This morning it let me in so I copied the whole article.

Link below


"John O'Keefe's niece was the first witness to take the stand at Karen Read's trial Wednesday morning.
The niece, who WBZ-TV will not identify by name, is now a high school junior. She was around 14 years old when John O'Keefe died. She has a younger brother who testified during the first trial but did not testify during the retrial.
O'Keefe's niece is his sister Kristen's daughter. Kristen died of a brain tumor in 2013, and her husband died shortly after of a heart attack. John O'Keefe then became the legal guardian for his niece and nephew, and moved in with them in Canton, Massachusetts.
No cameras, laptops, or phones were allowed in the courtroom during her testimony. WBZ's Kristina Rex was in the courtroom and took these handwritten notes.
Direct Examination: Questioned by ADA Laura McLaughlin
Niece testifies on her relationship with Karen Read

  • "It was…kind of dependent on the day"
  • "Some days we were more on good standards and other days we weren't on good standards at all and she would like favor my brother."
  • "She would not ignore me but it felt like a coldness."
  • Brother and Read: "they were pretty close."
Niece testifies about John O'Keefe and Karen Read's relationship
  • Lighthearted in the beginning
  • It changed by end of 2021/beginning of 2022
  • "They were fighting a lot."
  • "When I saw [the fights] it was normally at my house" or on the phone
  • When they would fight → KR "was very like angry, upset" and louder than O'Keefe

Niece testifies about Aruba vacation that took place over New Year's 2021-2022
  • Read & O'Keefe had an argument in niece and nephew's hotel room
  • O'Keefe checked on them and told nephew to get off iPad; Read defended nephew then "started yelling about like how he had kissed someone else… and she had witnessed it. It was really loud…she was very upset."

Niece testifies that the relationship changed after the Aruba trip
  • January 2022, O'Keefe and Read in the kitchen fighting while niece was in the room next door
  • "Their relationship was good but it had like run its course," she says O'Keefe said to Read
  • "I don't remember exactly what she said but she was upset by it"
  • "He asked her to leave the house. She did not want to leave the house."
  • O'Keefe saw niece in the other room and got angry that she witnessed the fight, asked Read "more aggressively" to leave then went upstairs to bedroom
  • Read followed him upstairs, banged on the door
  • In later days/weeks, "I could tell that there was tension," niece says
  • "They were cold towards each other"
  • A couple of times a week – tension & arguing
  • "I heard the defendant on the phone and she was saying that me and my brother were really worried" – on one occasion when she was trying to get JOK to come home when he had left the house for a drive, niece says she wasn't actually worried.

Niece testified about the night of O'Keefe's death
  • She had a rule that she had to charge her phone in O'Keefe's room at bedtime
  • After her friend left before midnight she was home alone and put her phone in O'Keefe's room and went to bed
  • Read came into her room at 4:30 AM shaking her awake… "told me that my uncle never came home…She was very frantic"
  • Read asked niece to use her phone to call O'Keefe – no answer
  • Read asked for phone numbers she didn't have including Jen McCabe
    • What could have happened
    • "Could I have done something?"
    • "Could he have been hit by a plow?"
    • Here, her memory had to be refreshed with prior testimony from trial 1
    • "Maybe I like… hit him"
  • Niece says she had never seen Read like this
    • Jen checked on niece and was "level headed"
    • Karen did not interact with niece
    • At this point, niece was very nervous she says
  • KR came back later that morning after the hospital with her Dad and brother
  • "She said to me and my grandfather that she felt like she was living in a nightmare."

Cross Examination: Questioned by David Yannetti
Niece testifies more about the nature of her relationship with Karen Read
  • Yannetti asks, "When Karen Read spent all this time with you, you didn't call her the defendant right?" No, the niece says. "You called her Karen?" Yes
    • Nails done once a month
    • Hair done at salon
    • Read attended basketball games? "Possibly but so did my uncle." Softball? Soccer? Yes.
    • Helped straighten niece's hair? Maybe once a week
    • Planned birthdays? 2020 scavenger hunt, yes
    • You would stay with Karen at her house in Mansfield? Yes.

Yannetti questions niece on Aruba incident
  • Read took kids for an Italian dinner and ice cream – niece doesn't remember
  • "O'Keefe was in the room with you the whole night with KR and nephew?" Yannetti asks. She doesn't remember… she just remembers after their fight that he fell asleep in niece's bed for a few hours
  • "Is it your testimony that JJ rang in the new year [asleep]?" Yannetti asks. Niece doesn't remember… "I had just gotten dumped by my 8th grade boyfriend, so it was a bit of a crisis." Chuckles heard throughout the courtroom.

Niece testifies about the relationship after Aruba
  • "There was never any physical contact between the two of them, correct?" Yannetti asks. "Correct."
  • Yannetti asks if Read continued to spend a lot of time at the house with the kids. "It was the same amount of time but it wasn't the same," niece says

Following the niece's testimony, Massachusetts State Trooper Zachary Clark took the stand."

More from CBS News


Karen Read trial jury shown graphic photos of John O'Keefe's injuries

Karen Read trial testimony focuses on forensic evidence after John O'Keefe's niece testifies


Kristina Rex
Kristina Rex is a reporter for WBZ-TV News.
© 2025 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
It is so clear through so many things that she is a jealous controlling shrew/stalker. Then if one has seen all of the texts with Higgins she is trying to get him to meet which he resists lucky for him imo and she acts as if she's not like that. REALLY interesting that the relationship with the boy was better than with the niece. Sounds like KR. In no sense of the word, was she even these kids' stepmom and even if you are one, you do not take on the role of mother nor take a stance over the parent of them or caretaker so her stepping in for the nephew was out of line. Against John.

And yes, she used the niece to call the other women and so on.
 
Her using reverse for that distance and at that speed and immediately leaving and continuing to behave like a raving lunatic is what proves to me that it was intentional.

Edit: Re raving lunatic, her first voicemail to John- at 12:37:08- was "John I ******* hate you"
I too am convinced it was absolutely intentional in a drunken rage. I do think that charge is harder to prove though.
 
You mean the niece? Doubtful. I asked like a kazillion times about it in here and was basically ignored, I figured because her testimony did not fit the KR innocent theme. And figured at a point no one was watching the actual trial. I get that, sometimes I can't either but still I go back or see what I can. I finally went and found it for myself. Whether I linked it or not, I couldn't tell you. So I wouldn't spend a lot of time trying to find it, guarantee you no one else ever linked it.
Just for the record, I was watching the trial all along, I was just discouraged from posting because (I could tell that) nobody else was.
 
It is so clear through so many things that she is a jealous controlling shrew/stalker. Then if one has seen all of the texts with Higgins she is trying to get him to meet which he resists lucky for him imo and she acts as if she's not like that. REALLY interesting that the relationship with the boy was better than with the niece. Sounds like KR. In no sense of the word, was she even these kids' stepmom and even if you are one, you do not take on the role of mother nor take a stance over the parent of them or caretaker so her stepping in for the nephew was out of line. Against John.

And yes, she used the niece to call the other women and so on.
Yeah, the man who John went out with that night said Read didn't want other women around John.
(His testimony was on Day 2.)
 
It is so clear through so many things that she is a jealous controlling shrew/stalker. Then if one has seen all of the texts with Higgins she is trying to get him to meet which he resists lucky for him imo and she acts as if she's not like that. REALLY interesting that the relationship with the boy was better than with the niece. Sounds like KR. In no sense of the word, was she even these kids' stepmom and even if you are one, you do not take on the role of mother nor take a stance over the parent of them or caretaker so her stepping in for the nephew was out of line. Against John.

And yes, she used the niece to call the other women and so on.
John was family oriented and his life was centered around those kids and that narcissistic bitch never wanted kids and so I think she's (also) a phoney who only used the kids as a way to be in John's life.
 
Just for the record, I was watching the trial all along, I was just discouraged from posting because (I could tell that) nobody else was.
I know. I'm watching as well, and no one was even posting to the thread about the trial or even a recap so I tried to give one and that's about it. I'd think one would want threads kind of up to date, not a knock, I know all are busy but not a soul even making a remark on it. The last trial there were more remarks but still seemed no one was actually watching any of it.
 
She never again spoke to anyone who knew John!
She never explained to his family what happened and over the phone as she was headed out of town to her parent's house, she told John's sister-in-law that she probably wouldn't be speaking to them again and that she (Read) "would have to remember the good times".
Correction: Read said she'd have to remember the bad times.
 
Yeah, the man who John went out with that night said Read didn't want other women around John.
(His testimony was on Day 2.)
I missed maybe 2 days of trial, have seen most of the rest.

It is clear in many things that she has to be the center of attention or at least of his. She acts nonchalant about it to Higgins trying to get him to meet her but it's clear that's just trying to reassure him not a big deal to her or to John and so on as a baiting tactic. Different crimes entirely but she is SO a Lori Daybell it isn't even funny. Yet even with Higgins she slipped on that stance showing upset over John's supposed kiss, hitting on another woman, etc.
 
John was family oriented and his life was centered around those kids and that narcissistic bitch never wanted kids and so I think she's (also) a phoney who only used the kids as a way to be in John's life.
Oh we are SO on the same page in this case. You got it. Yet she also resented the kids imo and resented being stuck with them if he was out and was NOT okay with that. I'd say she was also trying to come between them, interfering when it came to the boy in an example given above.

She's narcissistic (and I hate buzz words like that but there's just no other word for it), jealous, manipulative, it's all about Karen and so on. Without a doubt, she is a brunette Lori Daybell imo.
 
I missed maybe 2 days of trial, have seen most of the rest.

It is clear in many things that she has to be the center of attention or at least of his. She acts nonchalant about it to Higgins trying to get him to meet her but it's clear that's just trying to reassure him not a big deal to her or to John and so on as a baiting tactic. Different crimes entirely but she is SO a Lori Daybell it isn't even funny. Yet even with Higgins she slipped on that stance showing upset over John's supposed kiss, hitting on another woman, etc.
What happened on Fairview could have happend in Aruba except that what happened in Aruba took place in a hotel lobby.
 
the trial is boring me today tho i do have it on.... but she is just so smug..... i still think however that at least this far CW case is just riddled with corruption and reasonable doubt..... i'm thinking a 2nd mistrial is in the future
 
the trial is boring me today tho i do have it on.... but she is just so smug..... i still think however that at least this far CW case is just riddled with corruption and reasonable doubt..... i'm thinking a 2nd mistrial is in the future
Exactly. The CW has created 100% of all my reasonable doubt all by themselves with what they did and what they didn't do that would be expected of even an entry level hire.
 
Last edited:
the trial is boring me today tho i do have it on.... but she is just so smug..... i still think however that at least this far CW case is just riddled with corruption and reasonable doubt..... i'm thinking a 2nd mistrial is in the future
I hope you're wrong. JO needs justice and i hope this jury will see the obvious evidence linking her to his death. It just is so obvious to me. Her manic behaviour even when she is sober is making me wonder if she is an alcoholic. I mean who knocks back 8 vodkas and drives these days?
 

The Karen Read trial in Massachusetts continues today with a 17th day of witness testimony after the jury saw graphic photos from John O'Keefe's autopsy. Taking the stand Friday morning were two analysts from the Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab.
You can stream the trial live from Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham when proceedings begin at 9 a.m. on CBS News Boston or in the video player above.
Medical examiner Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello finished testifying Thursday after several hours on the stand.
Read is accused of hitting and killing O'Keefe, her Boston police officer boyfriend, with her SUV and leaving him to die in the snow in Canton in January 2022. The defense alleges there was a fight inside Brian Albert's home at 34 Fairview Road, and that O'Keefe was dragged outside and left in the yard.
Read's supporters are allowed to be closer to the courthouse on Friday after a federal appeals court ruled that a new buffer zone for the trial keeping them farther back violated their First Amendment rights. But there are conditions with the move - they have to remain quiet and can't interfere with the court's work.

Judge tells Karen Read jury "no muttering under your breath"

Before testimony started on Friday, Judge Beverly Cannone said she had an "important instruction" for the jury.
"I just want to be very clear that it's important that people do not comment on the evidence or make any comments," Cannone said, telling jurors to "just listen."
"Don't talk, don't make any facial expressions. No muttering under your breath, no audible noises because people need to hear what's going on and to understand everything," Cannone said. "Out of respect for your fellow jurors, I would ask that you be very careful to make sure you don't do that, and out of respect to the lawyers who've worked so hard to get this case before you."
Judge tells Karen Read jurors not to make faces or mutter comments at trial

Crime lab scientists testify at Karen Read trial

Just before witnesses took the stand, prosecutors played a clip of an April 2024 documentary interview with Read in which she describes finding O'Keefe in the snow.
"He had a piece of glass, like perched on his nose, just wedged like a splinter would be," Read said. "I pulled it and as soon as I pulled it, it gushed blood down his face."
The first witness to testify was forensic expert Andre Porto with the crime lab. The focus of his testimony was DNA found on John O'Keefe's clothes, sneakers, a drinking class and taillight fragments found at the scene in Canton. Porto testified that O'Keefe's DNA is a likely match to DNA found on the broken taillight pieces.
In the first trial, the defense did not cross-examine Porto. But this time, attorney David Yannetti asked Porto if the DNA of two men the defense has pointed to as possible third-party culprits were found on O'Keefe's clothing.
"Were you ever asked to compare the DNA profile of DNA profiles of either Brian Higgins or Brian Albert?" Yannetti asked.
"I was not," Porto said.
The next crime lab witness to testify was Ashley Vallier, who took photos of evidence found near O'Keefe's body.

Karen Read's lawyers say prosecutors broke rules

After the jury left on Thursday, Read's lawyers accused the prosecution of an "ambush" and sought to keep the commonwealth's crash reconstruction expert's opinion out of trial.
The defense says a new report shared by prosecutors changes the time that Read allegedly hit O'Keefe with her Lexus by 33 seconds.
"They're trying now to put on a defense against my defense," Read told reporters outside court on Thursday.
Special prosecutor Hank Brennan says new information was discovered while working on the case relating to a difference in the clocks on O'Keefe's phone compared to Read's SUV. He said the new information does not change anything.
Judge Cannone did not immediately rule on the issue. The back-and-forth continued on Friday.
"Our timeline has been the same since we have turned it over from the beginning," Brennan said. "They're just saying things without a good-faith basis."

Medical examiner testifies in Karen Read trial

Most of Thursday's testimony came from Dr. Scordi-Bello. While she was on the stand, the jury saw photos of bruises on O'Keefe's hand, abrasions on his arm and injuries to his face. The judge allowed the jurors to take a break when a picture of the inside of O'Keefe's stomach was displayed on screen.
Scordi-Bello testified that blunt injuries to the head caused O'Keefe's death, and she said that could have come from him falling backward onto frozen ground. But the medical examiner could not determine how O'Keefe died.
"Were you able to reach a conclusion as to the manner of Mr. O'Keefe's death to a reasonable degree of medical certainty?" Brennan asked.
"No I was not," Scordi-Bello responded.
The defense seized on the fact that experts couldn't choose between accident or homicide. Attorney Robert Alessi asked Scordi-Bello if the condition of O'Keefe's legs suggests he could have been hit by a car.
"So I did examine his legs and I did not see any impact of an impact site," Scordi-Bello said.
The defense also pressed the medical examiner on their theory that O'Keefe could have been beaten inside the home at 34 Fairview Road.
"Is that injury consistent or inconsistent with a punch?" Alessi asked.
"Could be consistent," Scordi-Bello said.

Karen Read trial latest

Earlier this week, the jury heard from a Massachusetts State Police forensic scientist who examined Read's Lexus, and O'Keefe's teenage niece who testified about Read and O'Keefe's deteriorating relationship in the months before his death.
Attorneys on both sides are prevented from talking to the media, but there are signs that the prosecution is wrapping its case even though key witnesses like Brian Higgins, Michael Proctor and Brian Albert have not testified. Legal analysts say it appears the commonwealth still plans to call crash reconstruction and DNA experts, but the defense expects to be starting its case relatively soon.
Read, 45, is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. She has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

More from CBS News


Karen Read trial jury shown graphic photos of John O'Keefe's injuries


Karen Read trial testimony focuses on forensic evidence after John O'Keefe's niece testifies

Neal Riley
Neal J. Riley is a digital producer for CBS Boston. He has been with WBZ-TV since 2014. His work has appeared in The Boston Globe and The San Francisco Chronicle. Neal is a graduate of Boston University.

© 2025 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,084
Messages
258,134
Members
1,020
Latest member
Lucia
Back
Top Bottom