I think the injuries were consistent with being hit by the car taillght and he was then propelled to near the hydrant and flagpole where he suffered the head injury that incapacitated him. The tailight broken pieces at the scene and in his clothes seems to confirm that contact.
The taillight of pieces would but have traveled with him at that low of speed. Simple physics.
If thinking of the right thing, yes, I saw it. There were a couple tiny sealed packets in it with tiny fragments, then a couple of loss pieces that were not tiny fragments.
so boring today. i had it on all day but honestly learned more about diddy trial on court tv than i absorbed from all of the hearing today in this trial
They did. They testified in this trial they went there straightaway that morning and described how they found them and the shoe - they took photos in situe then bagged them as evidence. John's shoe was still in the taped evidence bag that they had in court. Why do you think it was weeks after? Did you watch the testimony when the shoe was shown?
Agree totally. I know it is all necessary but it gets tiresome. The last however long with that longwinded defense atty was really getting old. More of that I supposed tomorrow. He wasn't going to get what he wanted and it was the wrong witness and it was clear what he was trying to do to no avail. Imo.
I know I've said I thought it was clever to use the/a leaf blower but I don't remember whether others agreed.
I don't believe I ever agreed but will say they have covered this ahead of time in this trial.
Yeah I think he was like 3 days on for sure. Yes they showed what seems to be Higgins, that was explained too although the D tried to make it into something else of course. They have to do this to try to create the fairy tale case of all of too many things to buy that they've had to explain away. That's when it's obvious it is b.s. imo. PLus it came some time after the fact. Almost always the case. Okay, how can we explain this so they come up with something, okay, how can we explain that now, so they come up with something... Then though there is that one thing that's harder so they have to go to something else for that one. Cripes at least to me, it is so obvious. It's what a D does. And even defendants do trying to explain things to LE when arrested. Oh this was why that, this was why this, oh no, now they know this....
Yeah, by now, the testimony was some time ago that there are times when there's a need to improvise. As I recall, Jackson acknowledged that as part of his question!
Right?! You'll see that It's the same sort of tactics with every witness.
I thought it was a good idea. Better than shovels and it preserved evidence, as we have seen.
Yeah showing an ATF officer doing his job at 1:30 in the morning to ensure vehicles don't get snowed in in the event of an emergency.
Oh for sure. I've seen it before. Here, they are trying hard to get some ground work in for their theory, as well as reasonable doubt. I honestly don't think it is going that great for them though (the D). My opinion anyhow. It will be a different story once they are up but to me it is all so obvious what they want to do versus what they are managing (or not managing) to do.
Yep, and so the lot could be plowed, etc. AND he is ATF.
and remember guys i have ridden that i don't think she did it train but my opinion is still on that fence....
Yes and she loves to dig in to his family too, show the attitude and lack of concern. She sickens me.