MADELINE SOTO: State of Florida vs. Stephan Sterns

1709179759561.png1709179780519.png

Madeline Soto missing: Florida mom begs for daughter's safe return home​

A mother in Orange County is begging for help locating her missing daughter.

Madeline ‘Maddie’ Soto was last seen on Monday, one day after she and her family celebrated her 13th birthday. Maddie’s mother, Jenn Soto, said surveillance video shows Maddie hanging out in a church parking lot on February 26 after being dropped off for school, but she never made it inside.

"I’m trying to hope for the best, but I’m scared for her," said Jenn Soto. "I want her to be okay; I want her to be safe… I don’t want her to come back harmed. I just want her back – whatever that means, I just want her back."

Jenn Soto said sheriff’s deputies are using K9s and a piece of Maddie’s clothing to try to track her scent near Town Loop Boulevard.

According to Jenn Soto, Maddie had never run away before. She said the teen had forgotten her cell phone at home that morning, but that was normal.

As of Wednesday morning, a variety of search teams are out searching for Maddie.


MEDIA - MADELINE SOTO: Missing from Orlando, FL - 26 Feb 2024 - Age 13
 
Last edited:
Take her or leave her but a lot of takes in tons of released things.

Clearly I have not seen heard all by a long shot because for one Jenn said the sex acts Stephan perpetrated on Maddie were NOT evil, for one. In some interview. Well I haven't heard that one yet. Just ONE example.

That alone has me about done with this "mother". Plunder says just wait until we hear that one.

And more. Haven't watched all yet. I have like three different ones open on this case right now as it is. All the interviews The Docket has for one. Maybe even four all together. Going to take time to get through them all and it keeps coming...

 
35,000 images he had of CSAM LE recovered!!!!!!!!! From Stephan. Not all of Maddie apparently but 35,000!
 
Was asked why she continually prioritized protecting Sterns over Maddie! Maddie begged for sleepovers with STenrs and Jenn gave into them. I'd hope no one is going to be like Jenn and blame the child as she is doing here. She was GROOMED to do this.

Another I think very good point, I've heard with ALL her talking not one compliment about Maddie out of Jenn's mouth. Not even a "she's very bright, but she has struggles", NOTHING. Sleepovers alone with mom's bf in the same bed, or former bf, whenever, give me a break, without mom present

And then there's a JOURNAL, she is unsure if Jenn's or Maddie's, from excerpts I would guess Maddie's...

I'm just irate. Where the F was this mother? In her own queen master bed eating bon bons?

I'm convinced "sources" put out to that news org that nothing charging her or to charge because they knew this dump was being released and boy there's plenty in it. And again, I haven't close to seen all and I've seen and listened to a lot of it.

She's playing case images provided/photos as it goes. She pulled ANYTHING bad which there weren't many of provided but she pulled them anyhow. I'll give her that.
 
I am going to say Plunder does walk the line to the edge with her speculation though. It's one thing I've went back and forth with her on and away at times. She really pushes it. However, as to what is in all the interviews, I am going to listen to them and hear such.
 
Not through the several I have open. Did watch some more on two of them. Now I see tonight the Docket has another one that is FIVE hours. I get that I can separate parts of them but when seeing the length it is overwhelming and feel others likely feel the same. Police Off the Cuff has one out at about two hours and figured they would jump on board before long, and their shows are generally an hour. The Docket's is more Stephan and Jennifer and his dad, at least per the headline.

Florida is Sunshine and open records and it took a lot of time and they don't even have all yet but there' been a heck of an interview and document dump that is not even close to covered yet.

The only other case I think I've ever seen similar is the Daybells. Not all areas necessarily but some of the various jurisdictions, that one is multiple crimes in different areas really started giving out the interviews, recordings, etc. and far more at a point during the cases. Gilbert I think if I recall, maybe Chandler, both AZ...

It was overwhelming but boy was it interesting. The same is going on here but this is ONE murder but tons of photos, docs, recorded interviews...

I think I said it above and will again that it's a no brainer that a "source" said right before or when this all hit and surely they knew it was going to, that nothing to charge Jenn on... It has to be because of something they have worked for the moment because there is SOOOO much to question it is not even funny.

I'll never be able to cover all of such. Way too many coincidences for me and too many things, I am beyond past such. And contradictions.

HE is HIS OWN STORY, and both together are as well imo.

I'll give one example because I told of it above. They did the presser and after Jenn came to find out Stephan had been to Northport the night before. Hey she had told his dad he'd only been missing like 25 minutes the next morning. And DID she only COME to find out, he was in HER CAR sleeping in THEIR MOTEL ROOM. And if you don't know when he effing LEFT WOMAN, then DO NOT PRETEND YOU DO and LIE, your DAUGHTER IS MISSING FOR GOD'S SAKE.

I don't know where this comes from but guessing it is in all the docs and said that Stephan went there to access their wifi... Earlier he was panicked about LE having his phone... Jennifer gave him hers because he was so panicked or was it lost without it. Of course it wasn't, he was concerned about what could possibly still be found even though he wiped TWICE... Then he couldn't access his email or anything on her phone because of two part authentication...

He wanted to delete more I'm sure and got to thinking...

In one interview a detective asked her why she is more worried about Stephan and sticking up for him than her missing daughter and some other things along those lines. Not out of line because that's exactly what she was showing and doing.

I know @Regina doesn't like Plunder and won't watch and let me tell you been there myself and even SAID SO in her comments back when, I had had it with something in a case she covered.

And in this one too, she does take what are legally obtained facts or at least statements and walks to the line with some of the for instance, sexual details which most people do not want and are not comfortable with, however, on the other hand,t his stuff is in the legal docs and what IS this case about. But then she speculates based on some of those details and I get to where I'm not on board with such either.

But she, like Grizzly who I've also been off board with at times, mostly because she joined the RA bandwagon though, so that was for my own reasons too and my opinion, they OBTAIN the documents too, they PAY for such and they spend hours and days reviewing tons and tons of pages and all and I don't think any of us do that or pay for such and these days nor does any "real" news, they wait and glom off and report from YTers that nicely YES, share WHAT they paid for.

Anyhow, not sure if will watch much more tonight and now there's already more out and I have hours left on a couple I was on. Next two days are early ones and tonight was a late one and so one of those few hours in between shifts.

I'm probably on a 75 percent meter now on Jenn Soto. I stayed in the middle almost throughout or at zero basically on the scale.

Oh and that journal, which one's is it....??

Jenn's or Maddie's....

From Maddie's frriend, she quit taking her meds on Valentine's and quit taking them.... She was never sure why or given the reason...

There is no doubt about the evil Stephan Sterns is, and thinking what about the mother in no way excuses him, but she is at the very least a worthless mother and a very contradictory one in her statements and red flags are EVERYWHERE.

I have not even TOUCHED on all the things...

By the way she was never okay with Stephan and Maddie sleeping together and never though okay or trusted such, not okay, but yet she said herself that night to them to go up to bed in the same room and bed and let her get some good sleep. THAT ALONE is you say one thing but DO another...

She wanted Maddie to go to bed and texted him make sure she goes to bed. Well she wanted to go to bed so why not keep Maddie with her and say time for you to go to bed and me too. We both had long days and send Stephan to bed alone in a single bed with her daughter...? SERIOUSLY. There are texts from her to him once they went up, she certainly herself didn't go straight to bed becaus such were like 45 to 50 minutes later and more...

I never go 100 percent but I am way leaning to this woman knew exactly what was going on and she sent her to him. Their own sex life well Plunder can tell ya some but he wasn't getting any to speak of from Jenn, and she described it at I think any time as vanilla, and she remembered I later interviews when asked that he had a thing and always wanted anal sex which she refused.

You see what I mean. Some of these things are IN interviews. And docs. Now they should not be ignored based on what these crimes here were but they are topics most don't want to know too much more about.

Then a woman Stephan was seeing, told of a few things too about him and Plunder is putting these things together, she doesn't go OVER THE TOP but she goes and does connect dots...

Speculating but the dots ARE there... Whether connected right who knows. She goes right up to the line of what most are comfortable with but most want their heads in the sand too...

At the same time she has some very good insights and so...

I could give examples of such of those too.

And they all do all the reading of every page and the work and more.

Anyhow, I don't have more in me right now and just trying to generally cover that there's a ton out there and I haven't shared the half of what all is, or what doesn't add up, and more.
 
OMG this is NOT adding up. Not one bit. As to Jenn. If I had the time to tell all the things, wow. I'm at an 85 percent now. As to knowledge at minimum.
 

Madeline Soto's mom admits to knowing Stephan Sterns was 'grooming and abusing' her daughter: docs​

The Kissimmee Police Department has released new documents from their investigation into the alleged "disappearance" of 13-year-old Madeline Soto.

FOX 35 News reviewed over 100 pages of case supplemental reports, revealing inconsistencies in the accounts given by Madeline's mother, Jennifer Soto, and her mother's boyfriend, Stephan Sterns, about Madeline's whereabouts on February 26, the day she was reported missing after failing to show up for school.


On that morning, the day her body was found, detectives contacted Jennifer for a follow-up interview. They informed her that the investigation was shifting from a missing persons case to a homicide as they believed she was deceased, at which point she became "silent for a few moments and started to cry," according to the report.

During the interview, Jennifer described Sterns as a "master liar" and said she wanted to believe he had nothing to do with Madeline's disappearance. However, after being shown evidence photos, she realized he was "guilty." When asked what she believed Sterns was guilty of, Jennifer replied, "he's been grooming and abusing my child," the report stated.

When asked if she thought Sterns had killed Madeline, she said, "at this point, I do," after they showed her a photo of Madeline slumped over in Sterns' vehicle.
 
In an interview of his and unsure if I've heard this before but think I have or at least part because he talks of how he allegedly got almost the school bus then they turned around and went back towards McDonald's making it sound almost like twice she thought she wanted McDonald's but then twice bailed on it and I have always found the second time unbelievable. However, s it goes on, he realizes he forgot to say he headed back home after getting almost all the way to the school and realizing he forgot his clicker. She was with him. Imo he is adding this "story" or part late as if forgotten because he has all of a sudden realized they may see him with her, and he says she was with and cameras would show that. He had to have gate guard scan his parking pass to get in. Whether true or not about the clicker, to me he is realizing too late that they may have seen her in the car after she was supposedly dropped at school. Detective asks him wouldn't it have been smarter to drop her at school as almost there and then go get his clicker??? He said yes, but it wasn't what he did. uses the excuse not a morning person a dozen times I swear.

I think I already knew most of this but here's the thing. Jennifer said SHE had to buzz him in, HE says the gate guard did. Since the guard was interviewed and there is likely a log of such things, his version is probably the truth so again Jenn LIED. And I don't think there are two different clicker incidents. ALSO she was sleeping IN and not awake allegedly. But if she buzzed him in that wasn't true at that point and she was up when Maddie was with him. Trying to recall if either said they saw the other at this point but it seems to me they didn't or that both sure didn't say such or one did and one didn't. I have listened to so much a bit unclear on that part.

You know there are also some indications that Maddie may have been killed downstairs and not upstairs and there is nothing showing it was the next day and not that night either. I believe it was one of her Crocs and her underwear that were DOWNSTAIRS. Such are in evidence photos AND MORE.

Neither of their stories are adding up and Jenn is lying as well.

I've got a lot open on this case and a lot to finish but it's too much.

Most of their stories were too matchy matchy by far, that's always a red flag but now in further details when split up, not all is matching up at all. Also a red flag.


The parents interview also confuse things some because like the mom thinks she knows things often because such was said to her by Stephan. Like that Maddie asked him to go up there and called. I don't think she knew that one for a fact. She did know of other calls that she did overhear though so it's a mix. if Maddie did ask him to, then imo Jenn made her do it because Maddie was having a total meltdown that Saturday as was Stephan in North Port all anxious and I suspect it was because she found out he was coming when she'd had freedom from him and by some opinions was doing better during that time. Teachers, for one.

Stephan's mom also said Jenn is bi polar (I don't know if we have confirmation of that or knew that or did we?) and that recently Maddie was showing signs of bipolar and that horrified Jenn and that she was bi polar too I think she did say as if it was known at some point... Neither Stephan nor Jenn mention any such thing when asked, only about Maddies ADD, and that other tests had indicated some autism traits but not necessarily having full blown autism. Both said the same thing, not a word about bipolar. So that may be just his mother's drama, hard to say. She DID say Jenn and Maddie were fighting all of the time and when asked how she knew that, she said she could hear them during phone calls with Stephan and then he'd have to hang up to go break it up. So that may well be fact.

Maddie's friend said she quit taking her meds on Valentine's Day and her mood changed, more moody, etc. Friend was unsure why she quit taking them. Yet Stephan the night the came there confirmed she took her meds as she was to do, and I gather he gave her a double dose which I'm not sure yet as kind of when in midst of some of this, but didn't seem to upset Jenn like it should have.

There is another subject that I don't want to go into and I'll just say Jenn talked about an anal sex thing re Stephan. IN an interview and so it is a "fact" or at least something said in a statement. There are hints of this with the one other gf or at least a position he wanted her in and a few things are leading to that conjecture, and leading to it with Maddie too. Jenn herself wouldn't go down that road, so he didn't get such from her...

Well I've kept that as vanilla as Jenn described their sex life and as I can but I will add the other thing and all can do their own conjecture as to what many are thinking... Maddie took I think two drugs for her ADD, etc. and that was all and then she also took Miralax.. I trust all know where that went or can guess.... But there's the other thing, she was said to have been off of that in recent times AND remember, he was not there...

Now this is more offensive to him so I'll go there. This is the woman he dated a few times who dropped him after his making a remark about waking up erect while sleeping with Maddie.

She said he couldn't get full erections basically ever during their times but one time he wanted her to lay face down and entirely still and flat and it was the one time he got a full on erection. Well he wants someone passive clearly or conked out which it is also said he did to Maddie, drugged her or over drugged her. Or speculated AND partially fact I believe.

I kept this as plain Jane and vanilla as I could. The whole miralax thing has quite a bit being wondered about.

Let me go to more other talk of such because I have distaste myself talking about the above but then he was sexually molesting this child for years, that is part of the case, a huge part but I don't go down those thoughts myself whatsoever unless facts become known that can't be ignored and then I still don't want to know the details.

Most know painkillers and certain drugs can cause constipation. Well I know Maddie was not prescribed painkillers. Not sure what other drugs might. The ONLY thing I'm trying to portray above is there are reasons people are seeing some connections here as there's more than one hint of something and with various people...

It's part of things and statements and so this is all I'm saying about it, and some are connecting dots and there are dots to connect. Whether done correctly I have no idea.

There's vast info that's been dumped here on FOIA requests and more coming from what I understand. I doubt I will see all. Back in the day I did like in Daybell, but I did NOT work then. It won't likely ever happen now unless it slows again and I stay on just this case and go back over a long period of time and stay on it. We will see. I wish there was a Tom with it because he is who I rely on in Delphi. Grizzly and Plunder are not Tom, not even close. And then the later ones that will take it up after they sift through their shows and the released info later than they aren't Toms either although some are at least not the first two I mentioned. The Docket guy's okay so far but haven't watched a ton with him to know and he always does lump long videos. I guess like I said one can watch a part, one interview one day, another another day, etc. and leave it up but not real used to such. The conversation did get more flowing after he started, I always think he's kind of slow going in his remarks but later in it got better.

There are tons out there and of course like above, now media is taking some things but rest assured, it's the YTers that paid for and got this information, it sure wasn't MSM or regular news media. it never is.

And I will say this, they all share it, link it, etc. and only all ask credit be given if someone uses it AND they do DO the same for each other in return if say Grizzly gets something from the Docket, vice versa and so on and Plunder too. And they DO FOIA things and I can't knock that part either. All legit and they do the work and they follow up and THEY PAY for IT.

Anyhow no way I can give by plays on all I've listened to that are actual statements and interviews but wanted to touch on a few things before I forget them and I WILL because it just keeps coming.
 
Oh Jennifer Soto, what the heck is wrong with you. Listening to her right now adjust what she has to say based on what she is being told...

Protecting him, him, him.

He was moving back but had to wait six months to re-sign to the job...

She's on disability and can only work part time at best and she couldn't afford to keep him, etc.

Job fell through down with mom and dad.

Hey entirely different story than what his mom and dad tell. AND OTHERS.

His folks seem to deal just fine and Jenn seemed to think so too until detective told her that they were old, needed help, etc. (NOT just the opposite, helping the son) and as she hears this, she starts adjusting her story big time to match what Stephan had claimed...

She is a LIAR and more concerned about his arse than about her missing then dead daughter!!!
 
Joel puts the struggle in this case very well. The details are too disturbing to talk about but on the other hand the matter and what happened here is too important not to talk about. He says, and I do not want to know, but imagine the worst of the worst as to what was done to this poor child. I do NOT even WANT to know but it is why I touched the bit I'f heard about above, as lightly as I could.

This case has gripped me for many a reason. A key one is how this mother could not have known and I am NOT convinced she didn't.

Another key one is just Maddie herself, there's just something about her

And sadly, the WHY.

AND I think exactly what he said--it is too important NOT to talk about. Such went on, apparently under everyone's noses for years and years...

It isn't like this man was smart. He was caught fairly quickly, drove around with a dead body, caught on camera, had a flat tire, backpack and laptop nearby in dumpster found quickly, etc. So with him NOT so smart, WTH is wrong with all the people who surrounded her for all of these years?!

I'm trying hard to explain why it's one that matters--they all do--but this one, a LOT. Teachers, grandparents, mom, friends, you name it... Years and years and years. Cameras, a mother who sends them to bed together (????).

And mom is NOT adding up. And has most definitely lied. Far more than once.

I think in a similar way to Daybell it is just the absolutely shock of how anyone could do this to a child but also why so many people around the perp/s said not a word or could be so darned clueless for so long.

And sadly how the kids either never speak up, can't speak up or do and no help comes.

They are just so over the top bad.

Daybell had adult victims too so not the same at all but the things I've mentioned ARE the same or appear to be. Were others complicit or no? Participants or no?

Anyhow, haven't watched it yet but did a few minutes, and so much out there, I am overwhelmed with where to start or what to finish first.

 
Gray Hughes received at least 7 hours of audio files from The Docket (he's often mentioned that he and The Docket spit the costs) and I've listened to at least 5 hours and I have yet to hear anything along the line of "the sex stuff isn't evil but the murder is".
Anyway, one thing of most interest to me so far is the info that Sterns appeared extraordinarily anxious on that Saturday and had asked both his parents for anxiety meds. Now, my line of thinking on that is whether it was a ruse, that is, whether he wasn't actually out of meds and that his intention was to use those on Madeline.

So it appears that it was at least twice during the search phase that Sterns was out of pocket. Based prior info from phone records, that first night, he was in the vicinity of where Madeline's body was found. (Info re phone recs. is from a prior Gray Hughes episode in which he'd correlated phone records.)
In yet another more recent GH episode (lol!) is that there was a canine hit on Jenn's vehicle and my take on those circumstances (Sterns location and hit on vehicle) is that he returned to the location of the body to somehow change the scene, that is, he either took or removed something but either way, he had contact with the body.
Btw, the body was found in St. Cloud which is where Jenn said they used to hike.
Re the next time he was unaccounted for, according to toll records, he'd been in Northport at 7:45AM.
(The father said Jenn called him that morn. looking for Sterns and he asked her how long he'd been gone and she said 25 minutes. My take on that is that 25 minutes is more likely how long she'd been up, not how long he'd been gone.

(Let's see, what else, lol!)
The living in the woods text on Madeline's phone appears to be unrelated to anything to do with any of the circumstances in the crimes.

There was a rather slow response from police that Madeline was missing, which is something I gathered early-on.
And the question soon arose as to why there was never an alert from the school that Madeline was absent...

Jenn's mother didn't like Sterns because "he didn't do anything". As for how long he worked at Disney- I don't know but he apparently hadn't worked anywhere since he moved out of the apartment the prior December.

*I don't know who the detective is but I take issue with his approach in an interview he conducted with one of Madeline's friends. He seemed to have tunnel vision and it also appeared to me he tried to ellicit rumor rather than firsthand knowledge. To be fair, after he'd obtained a certain amount of info from the witness, I can't say I actually listened to the rest of it.
*I think he might be who wrote that narrative as to his interpretation as to what Jennifer said about that not evil, that evil. (lol!)

That's all for now except that so far, it 's clear that Madeline told no one about the sexual abuse nor did anyone suspect it.
 
Last edited:
Gray Hughes received at least 7 hours of audio files from The Docket (he's often mentioned that he and The Docket spit the costs) and I've listened to at least 5 hours and I have yet to hear anything along the line of "the sex stuff isn't evil but the murder is".
Anyway, one thing of most interest to me so far is the info that Sterns appeared extraordinarily anxious on that Saturday and had asked both his parents for anxiety meds. Now, my line of thinking on that is whether it was a ruse, that is, whether he wasn't actually out of meds and that his intention was to use those on Madeline.

So it appears that it was at least twice during the search phase that Sterns was out of pocket. Based prior info from phone records, that first night, he was in the vicinity of where Madeline's body was found. (Info re phone recs. is from a prior Gray Hughes episode in which he'd correlated phone records.)
In yet another more recent GH episode (lol!) is that there was a canine hit on Jenn's vehicle and my take on those circumstances (Sterns location and hit on vehicle) is that he returned to the location of the body to somehow change the scene, that is, he either took or removed something but either way, he had contact with the body.
Btw, the body was found in St. Cloud which is where Jenn said they used to hike.
Re the next time he was unaccounted for, according to toll records, he'd been in Northport at 7:45AM.
(The father said Jenn called him that morn. looking for Sterns and he asked her how long he'd been gone and she said 25 minutes. My take on that is that 25 minutes is more likely how long she'd been up, not how long he'd been gone.

(Let's see, what else, lol!)
The living in the woods text on Madeline's phone appears to be unrelated to anything to do with any of the circumstances in the crimes.

There was a rather slow response from police that Madeline was missing, which is something I gathered early-on.
And the question soon arose as to why there was never an alert from the school that Madeline was absent...

Jenn's mother didn't like Sterns because "he didn't do anything". As for how long he worked at Disney- I don't know but he apparently hadn't worked anywhere since he moved out of the apartment the prior December.

*I don't know who the detective is but I take issue with his approach in an interview he conducted with one of Madeline's friends. He seemed to have tunnel vision and it also appeared to me he tried to ellicit rumor rather than firsthand knowledge. To be fair, after he'd obtained a certain amount of info from the witness, I can't say I actually listened to the rest of it.
*I think he might be who wrote that narrative as to his interpretation as to what Jennifer said about that not evil, that evil. (lol!)

That's all for now except that so far, it 's clear that Madeline told no one about the sexual abuse nor did anyone suspect it.
I find Gray's shows very hard to listen to. Not like I never did, but pretty rare. However, to me, anyone who is playing the interviews is what I'm after, the interviews and the released evidence, etc.

Well Maddie supposedly had a meltdown the very same day. She texted such to her friend. And asking her for help. Unfortunately the friend never saw it until Sunday.

I don't think Stephan was looking for meds for Maddie at all. Why would he, Jenn has a treasure trove of meds. He needed something to get himself under control.

When going to the scene, it may well have been to hide her better or just to ensure she was there and not been found, etc.

The living in the woods remarks is not evidence but sure could be indicative of how she wanted neither him nor Jenn around her and wanted to live on her own.

Yes, it was a slow response by LE or so it seems. No argument there. Once there though, they seemed to go at it from then on and it wasn't a day was it before the backpack and computer were found?

I haven't heard Jenn's mothers interview yet. I've been on hold with them last couple of days.

I think Maddie was upset when she found out he was coming, very upset. She'd been free of him. I also think he knew it or something was said to him by her OR she intended to and he sensed it and she said something to indicate it. it comes down to me it was either pregnancy or she was going to do something about it and out him. Why else? He never killed her in all the years prior. Unless it is something very sick and that he filmed and he wanted to have sex after. There are those that speculate such, I don't. I feel it is one of the first two things I stated.

Yes, he went back to the scene, this has been known prior to the info dump if I recall. 'And he went to Northport after getting dad to come to Orlando...

Further, dad said he told him he'd arrived at something like 6:30 on Saturday to the home, his destination but then per dad, Sunpass records show him traveling after that. Stephan has told everyone in interviews more than once he arrived about 8:30 I think. Maybe he just lied to dad and was not there yet... But still he could not have likely gotten in without Maddie home, no clicker I'm sure as he no longer lived there. So THIS one could be minor, hard to say, but a third thing to question...

While it's unlikely, we also have no way of knowing Jenn was never with him on ANY trip.

Somehow my remarks got out of order here. I trust it still makes sense. At least I think it did. My last typed remark is higher up than it should be.

I WAS going in order to your posted comments. Things got shuffled a bit and related things to my own comments separated a bit from the flow it was.

Per HIS parents, he worked at Disney for a year, longer than any job Jenn has ever held per them. Dad's version is he was done paying Jenn or her dad, etc. rent for Stephan. He also knew at $30K a year at Disney he would never be able to live on his own and support self in Florida. He thought bringing him home would save him the rent and since he had NOW shown he could keep it together long enough to hold a job for a year, he was going to put him to work getting him on a better paying path. However, he came home and reverted to old ways, doing NOTHING.

So from what THEY said, he worked at Disney the entire last year he was at Jenn's. I guess Stephan could have lied to them but they know a bit about where the pay comes from and the account for such, etc.

They seem very forthcoming. The mother does try to implicate Jenn and she defiinitely has her own speculation as to what happened and what was really going on but they never hesitated with answers and much of what they said was very unflattering to their son and brutally honest about his bad traits and more. A far cry from jenn's cautious and contradictory interviews and lyiing at least for him if NOT involved herself.

I noticed nothing in the interview with Madeline's friend. Please explain what you mean as to tunnel vision and his approach. It was one of the first I heard so maybe wasn't looking for that and just more wanting to hear what all had to say.

The part about that not evil was cited in something I watched where they claimed someone who had other recordings or transcripts or ones they had not been through yet said it but seems to be fact or somewhere in all the evidence, whether Jenn herself in an interview or in a report or something. Whoever I was watching and I now can't recall which one, I have three different channels up at least with all these recordings as they were all covering different ones at first on different days and so forth as they started going through the tons of things obtained, said it was somewhere in what was released because who she heard it on was either reading something or had the video playing and I can't recall that either.

I guess there is a SLIGHT chance it is not true or in the things released but it sounded pretty certain. I don't know that a detective put words in her mouth in a report and that's where it is, or do you know this?

As far as the friend, not sure why you didn't hear it all because if it is the one I am thinking of, it wasn't very long at all. Not two minutes but not any hour or probably even half an hour either.

I disagree with your last statement, respectfully. Her mother may have well suspected and even KNOWN. A ton think she SENT her kid to STEPHAN knowing full well for what. A ton think she was part of it all. And the majority think at minimum she suspected and had indications and/or know and just did not care. And I'm not talking about internet whackos, I am talking about other LE, attorneys, more looking at all of this and what is known.

I don't know what you've watched fully but Jenn is not adding up in all her interviews and she lied many a time. And then if you have seen a ton of them, what she says does not match what others say or what is known.

AT minimum she sent her child TO BED with an adult male. NO ONE DOES THAT. NO ONE! A 13 year old?? Emphasis is NOT at you. She's a horrible mother and also at minimum selfish and fully neglectful. It is her JOB to protect her child and make decisions in her best interests and safety.

I agree that no one interviewed so far (haven't seen all yet though) seemed to suspect or have been told by Maddie). HOWEVER any time they were there, the mother kept her OUT of the bedroom with BOTH STEPHAN AND JENN... Not just him, that thing of the three in bed together, etc...

BOTH THINGS are terrible parenting, the threesome in bed and the duo of Stephan and Maddie in BED together.

There's tons of interviews of Jenn, she is NOT unintelligent. And so...

The thing about so many interviews of various people in Maddie's life and the evidence known the inconsistencies when comparing all are everywhere. Or her version is entirely different than that of others. So is his.

By the way, I forget where I heard it but recently, I might have put something on for a couple of minutes last night, oh maybe STS so another has now covered, I DID watch that, found it worth it for the most part even though they were later to it.

But there is something about pictures Maddie was drawing at school which seemed to indicate she was trying to "tell" someone. Graphic ones if I recall.

Just ended my long work week, little sleep last two nights for sure and never much throughout it and I ingested a LOT on this dump of things already. I recall a LOT but not everything and I['ve damned between different places so I could hear different interviews as no one had all right away up and on.

Anyhow, emphass not at you but Jenn is way down in my book. And she never WAS up as in thinking she was some perfect mother. I did allow benefit of the doubt re naivete but heck a lot of that was even before we knew how many YEARS this had been going on...She just keep slipping and she's slipped BIG with me listening to what I have...

I know you don't agree.

Maddie's meltdown means something too. As do Jenn's lies and putting him over her daughter even after daughter is missing and continuing the lies. I have so many takeaways I couldn't even start to byplay them all with what I've listened to or share them all. I don't know how you come out with so few. But that's just differing I guess as we all can.

You know, it's just something too how easily Stephan just comes for a visit and both gets to sleep with Jenn's daughter and take Jenn['s car any time he felt like it. Such easy access to all. If this mom was going to smoke dope and sleep her life away on meds, she should have had her daughter locked in her room with her at minimum and him out of the house. Instead she pretty much gave him access to all. Maddie was 13, she had other renters in the home, does she NOT keep her keys up or hidden even? She wasn't even WORKING that day, and I'm wondering about this supposed doctor's appt. too. The times aren't adding up nor is it adding up she was sleeping when they left. And I see enough reason to wonder if she was killed Saturday night AND there are signs it may have happened DOWNSTAIRS. Have you hit that stuff yet?

Anyhow, enough. Didn't plan my head to get carried too far into it as not sure I'm ready to go watch more either. Been a week but they all are. There's just a ton of stuff.

Have you heard any roommate interviews? I haven't yet but I gather there are those too. Not sure if anything much in them or not. Just that there are a TON of interviews. I know her mom has one, does her sister...? Her dad??? Jenn's I mean.
 
That's a new one to me. He is seen later the "school day" in the afternoon throwing more things in the complex dumpster...
 
Okay as far as LE time, I am watching another new one out, haven't finished the first ones but this is going to do the timeline things and as to where Jenn was too.

BUT they reported her missing around 8 and they were on body cam video around 8:30. So LE was not slow to respond. I am guessing as is the case in many cases, not until they officially reported was it responded to.

And Jenn left home at 4:30 to go get Maddie? And Stephan was throwing more things in the dumpster like around 2:30.

Does that school really run that late? And it's a bit of a drive? I know it starts later than ours would here.

I will likely never keep up like I could in document and interview dumps in Vallow where I watched everyone and every single thing but was not working then. So rather than go back I did a refresh and am on one focusing on timelines here and then I believe going to compare Jenn's and what she claims.

I already noticed things like that in watching them both so I'm very interested in such....
 
LE was ON this from the start. Well we knew that just from body cams and them going to where Stephan said he dropped her off, that very same night. So a late response my guess is she was not reported MISSING until 8... Officially maybe anyhow... Or maybe by a PARENT. Who knows.

By the next day they were all over sh*t and that night too.
 
OMG the changing times! I already had noted this but it is being pointed out big time. Now it's 2:30.
 
If anyone has not seen the teeny room and the very small bed and basically not much else for room or space, they NEED to ask to where SHE sent them to bed... IF that is even true...
 
Wow. I went back to the original ones I hadn't finished and picked The Docket to continue some and ran into another friend video, I THINK it is the same friend I heard the first one from, they aren't sure either at this point but some thingss match up so I THINK so.

Terrible background noise,s sounds like an interstate or something very noisy.

BUT caught enough, just a bit irritating that way.

They had their periods about two days apart, Maddie first. The last time Maddie was late for I believe it said two weeks or more.... She finally supposedly got it... OR did she...

When asked at the end of anything she wanted to add or thought they should know, she said Jenn in her call to her told her, and also told her dad, that SHE dropped her off at school. Not EVEN that they did, that she did! Well here we go again with Jenn's cover and lies OR SHE TRULY was the one but the girl never was dropped off.

At this point they know he has been arrested and what for. She did not know but hindsight (my term) has her thinking some things. She said he and Maddie were REALLY close. Not close like her and her dad who are close but REALLY CLOSE and I take that to mean not a good thing, too affectionate, weird, etc. A LOT is also bleeped out including the adult's names like Stephan or Jenn but one can figure in most all cases what and who she is talking of...

Detective wonders about her never even saying anything to a best friend even about Stephan['s abuse and her thought was that he threatened her about if she ever told.

So there WAS I am sure a pregnancy scare for one. This girl offered nothing for the most part that she was not asked, until the end. The girl also said Maddie was a virgin. Maddie said nothing about pregnancy when late.

It's the first I've ever heard that Jenn said SHE TOOK HER TO SCHOOL. Talk about involved. From the get go or covering...

The background noise was irritating but what came out was of interest.

if this is the detective you @Regina was talking about, I see it differently. He is doing his job and doing it in the way they have to go about it and knows exactly what he was doing.

WHY would you claim you took her to both the friend and her dad at separate times? I mean the girl had no reason to think a thing about Stephan until hindsight later so why the lies?

About down for the count but this all is very significant in my opinion. All the background noise was irritating as heck but I stuck it out.
 
I find Gray's shows very hard to listen to. Not like I never did, but pretty rare. However, to me, anyone who is playing the interviews is what I'm after, the interviews and the released evidence, etc.
The one I watched most recently is just the audio files- one interview after another- with no interruption.
Well Maddie supposedly had a meltdown the very same day. She texted such to her friend. And asking her for help. Unfortunately the friend never saw it until Sunday.
I recall two people saying she was upset that she didn't get money for her birthday.
Some of the friends' interviews were hard for me to hear and so I may have missed it but I don't recall anyone saying she texted asking for help. Which friend was that and help with what?
I don't think Stephan was looking for meds for Maddie at all. Why would he, Jenn has a treasure trove of meds. He needed something to get himself under control.
It's just a thought and so do you think it's really necessary to respond so vehemently? Lol!
Anyway, one excuse Sterns used on detectives was that he was doped-up (or what ever he called it) on Ambien and so I'd like to know if that was the same "4 yr old" med he told his parents he'd found. (Btw, I don't recall where they (his parents) said he found it, do you?)
Yes, it was a slow response by LE or so it seems. No argument there. Once there though, they seemed to go at it from then on and it wasn't a day was it before the backpack and computer were found?
I think it was the next day but have you seen the photos re that? The backpack was covered in paint and I wonder if Sterns did that to discourage anyone from retrieving those items.
Further, dad said he told him he'd arrived at something like 6:30 on Saturday to the home, his destination but then per dad, Sunpass records show him traveling after that. Stephan has told everyone in interviews more than once he arrived about 8:30 I think. Maybe he just lied to dad and was not there yet... But still he could not have likely gotten in without Maddie home, no clicker I'm sure as he no longer lived there. So THIS one could be minor, hard to say, but a third thing to question...
If recall correctly, Sterns also told detectives that he that he arrived on Saturday...
I remember his father saying that the toll recs. showed him there later but I don't remember whether he said the toll recs were from Sat or Sun...
At this point, all I know for a fact is that he didn't arrive at the apartment until after Jenn's sister had dropped off Madeline.
Per HIS parents, he worked at Disney for a year, longer than any job Jenn has ever held per them. Dad's version is he was done paying Jenn or her dad, etc. rent for Stephan. He also knew at $30K a year at Disney he would never be able to live on his own and support self in Florida. He thought bringing him home would save him the rent and since he had NOW shown he could keep it together long enough to hold a job for a year, he was going to put him to work getting him on a better paying path. However, he came home and reverted to old ways, doing NOTHING.

So from what THEY said, he worked at Disney the entire last year he was at Jenn's. I guess Stephan could have lied to them but they know a bit about where the pay comes from and the account for such, etc.
Yeah, anything Sterns told his parents should be called into question!
Now, I don't know the facts surrounding his employment at Disney but if his paycheck wasn't going for expenses such as rent and phone, where did they think it was going? I don't recall any explanation on their part as to why they were providing for his rent and phone, do you?
I recall the father saying that he "couldn't afford him working at Disney" ...and so Sterns moved back home to work with him but then was vague as to why it fell through.
I noticed nothing in the interview with Madeline's friend. Please explain what you mean as to tunnel vision and his approach. It was one of the first I heard so maybe wasn't looking for that and just more wanting to hear what all had to say.
I think among the first indications of tunnel vision I noticed is when the friend told the detective they texted a lot, the detective asked sexted or texted. Now it's my opinion that the detective wouldn't have mentioned the word, sexted, if he hadn't already been of a particular mindset.
I'd have to go back to hear that interview to be specific about any questions I found either suggestive or unproductive.
The part about that not evil was cited in something I watched where they claimed someone who had other recordings or transcripts or ones they had not been through yet said it but seems to be fact or somewhere in all the evidence, whether Jenn herself in an interview or in a report or something. Whoever I was watching and I now can't recall which one, I have three different channels up at least with all these recordings as they were all covering different ones at first on different days and so forth as they started going through the tons of things obtained, said it was somewhere in what was released because who she heard it on was either reading something or had the video playing and I can't recall that either.

I guess there is a SLIGHT chance it is not true or in the things released but it sounded pretty certain. I don't know that a detective put words in her mouth in a report and that's where it is, or do you know this?
It comes from the narrative of a report and it's an interpretation of what Jenn as opposed to what she actually said. In other wrods, the only direct quote was that the murder was evil.
Gray Hughes read from the document in one of his videos, and to his knowledge, the audio of that interview hasn't been released. Btw, has the audio of the interview in which Sterns is confronted with the material on his phone been released? I don't think it has.
It's a little off-topic but a lot redactions don't make sense to me as to why it's redacted info.
I don't know what you've watched fully but Jenn is not adding up in all her interviews and she lied many a time. And then if you have seen a ton of them, what she says does not match what others say or what is known.
I've watched all of her interviews fully- all that I'm aware have been released- and I don't know of any instance in which she lied!
Have you heard any roommate interviews? I haven't yet but I gather there are those too. Not sure if anything much in them or not. Just that there are a TON of interviews. I know her mom has one, does her sister...? Her dad??? Jenn's I mean.
I heard one roommate interview and Jenn's mother's but not her sister's.
I think it was Jenn's dad who is on audio asking a detective questions re what more can be done.
 
Last edited:
LE was ON this from the start. Well we knew that just from body cams and them going to where Stephan said he dropped her off, that very same night. So a late response my guess is she was not reported MISSING until 8... Officially maybe anyhow... Or maybe by a PARENT. Who knows.

By the next day they were all over sh*t and that night too.
As I recall, Jenn said in one of her first on-camera interviews that she called police at 4-something that afternoon.
It appears to me that one issue may have been jurisdiction but surely that's not the reason police didn't arrive to meet with Jenn until 8PM.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
3,107
Messages
263,204
Members
1,035
Latest member
graave!
Back
Top Bottom